Child Discomfort and Parental Acceptability of Silver Diamine Fluoride and Alternative Restorative Treatment

November 27, 2020 updated by: Nourhan M.Aly

Child Discomfort and Parental Acceptability of Silver Diamine Fluoride and Alternative Restorative Treatment: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of the current study was to compare pain perception of young children treated with SDF and ART, as well as their parents' acceptability of both modalities.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Eighty, 3-8-years-old children, having at least one deciduous asymptomatic tooth with active caries were randomly assigned into 2 groups; SDF for caries arresting in the test group, and ART for caries removal in the control group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21512
        • Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 8 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Negative and definitely negative behavior according to Frankl's behavior rating scale.
  • Having at least one deciduous asymptomatic tooth with active caries, as defined by the International Caries Detection and Assessment System; ICDAS II scores 4, 5, 6.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children who suffered from silver allergy, oral ulcerations, pulpal infections and whose parents needed immediate permanent restorations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Atraumatic Restorative Treatment
Steps of ART caries removal were carried out following the Frencken et al. criteria where the cavity opening was widened using the tip of a dental hatchet. The carious dentin was then removed using a spoon excavator starting at the enamel-dentin junction, unsupported enamel was removed using the hatchet, and finally the cavity was cleaned using a wet cotton pellet and dried. After complete removal of infected dentin, the cavity walls and floor were conditioned for 10 seconds, washed and dried with cotton pellets, then restored with chemically cured glass ionomer cement that was applied under finger pressure, then coated with petroleum jelly.
EXPERIMENTAL: Silver Diamine Fluoride
Steps of SDF 38% application were carried out following the manufacturer's instructions. Eligible primary carious teeth were first dried and isolated using cotton rolls and gauze. Adjacent soft tissues were isolated using petrolleum gelly in order to prevent any irritation or staining from SDF that was directly placed into the carious lesion using a microbrush, allowed to absorb for 2 minutes, then dried with air. Parents were instructed that children should not eat for one hour after treatment. The second application was done after 6 months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain perception
Time Frame: 6 months
Pain reaction was assessed using the Sound, Eye, Motor scale (SEM) according to Wright et al. criteria. It is an objective method for pain assessment, where the child's level of anxiety was evaluated according to three types of observations. The score in each category ranged from one (no pain) to four (intense pain). A lower score represents less physical reaction to the procedure than does a higher value. Time of treatment was recorded using a stopwatch.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parents' acceptability of the treatment modality
Time Frame: 2 weeks
It was assessed using a 5-likert scale, self-administered questionnaire, specifically designed for the current study.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amel M Ahmed, Phd, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt and College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • Study Chair: Hoda M Abdellatif, PhD, College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and College of Dentistry Texas A&M University, Texas, USA
  • Study Chair: Sarah I Baghdady, M.Sc, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
  • Study Director: Mona A ElKateb, PhD, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt and College of Dentistry, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 12, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SDF vs. ART

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on SDF

Subscribe