Hospitalization or Outpatient ManagEment of Patients With SRAS-CoV-2 Infection - Revised HOME-CoV Score Study

March 12, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Angers

Hospitalization or Outpatient ManagEment of Patients With Suspected or Confirmed SRAS-CoV-2 Infection: the Revised HOME-CoV Score Study.

In the context of COVID-19 pandemic, identifying low-risk patients who can be safely treated at home and high-risk patients requiring hospitalization or even intensive care is crucial for Emergency Departments. Thanks to a consensus of experts using the Delphi method, we previously defined the HOME-CoV rule. The HOME-CoV rule consists of 8 items precluding home treatment for patients consulting in the Emergency Department (ED) with confirmed or highly suspected mild to moderate COVID-19. It has been validated in a prospective study, patients with a negative rule having a very-low rate of invasive ventilation or death within the 7 days following ED presentation (HOME-CoV study, NCT: 02811237).

Using logistic regression, we revised the HOME-CoV rule in order to define a score allowing. The revised HOME-CoV score comprises 7 criteria and, retrospectively assessed in the database of the HOME-CoV study, it exhibits promising performances. A revised HOME-CoV score < 2 had a sensitivity of 0.93 (0.84 to 0.98), a specificity of 0.60 (0.58 to 0.61) and negative predictive value of 1.00 (0.99 to 1.00); and a score > 4 had a sensitivity of 0.41 (0.28 to 0.54), a specificity of 0.93 (0.92 to 0.94) and a positive predictive value of 0.11 (0.07 to 0.16).

The present study aims to prospectively validate the revised HOME-CoV score, firstly, in identifying a subgroup of COVID-19 patients with a low risk of evolution to severe COVID-19 and who could be safely treated at home.

For this purpose, we will perform an interventional multicentric prospective pragmatic cohort study with implementation of the revised HOME-CoV score to triage COVID-19 patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In all participating Emergency Departments, patients with highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 are evaluated for potential inclusion. Clinical, biological, and imaging data that may be involved in decision-making about hospitalization, including all criteria of the revised HOME-CoV score, are collected. The revised HOME-CoV score is calculated. Patients with a score <2 qualify for home treatment. They qualify otherwise for hospitalization. For patients with a score > 4, hospitalization in a unit allowing monitoring of vital parameters is recommended. The qualification for home treatment or for hospitalization can be overruled by the physician-in-charge in case of major medical or social reasons. A justification explaining the cause of overruling is required.

A phone-call follow-up is performed on Day 7 and the patients' clinical status according to the Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement of COVID-19 from the World Health Organization (WHO-OSCI) is collected.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France
        • CHU Angers

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient (≥ 18 years old)
  • Admitted for COVID-19 infection confirmed by a positive SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR or considered probable by the physician in charge of the patient.
  • Not requiring care in intensive care unit or resuscitation unit or
  • No subject of a limitation decision of active therapies,
  • Free informed express consent to participate in the study orally given or signed by the patient according to local legislation,
  • Insurance cover according to local legislation;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient admitted to the emergency room for 18 hours or more,
  • Patient whose follow-up on D7 is impossible, whatever the reason,
  • Patient already included in the study,
  • Person deprived of their liberty by judicial or administrative decision,
  • Person under psychiatric care under duress,
  • Person subject to a legal protection measure,
  • Person unable to express consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: revised HOMe-CoV
Revised HOME-CoV

Educational lectures, posters, and pocket cards showing and explaining the revised HOME-CoV score are communicated to participating Emergency Departments.

For included patients, the physician-in-charge calculates the revised HOME-CoV. Patients with a score <2 qualified for home treatment. They qualified otherwise for hospitalization. For patients with a score > 4, hospitalization in a unit allowing monitoring of vital parameters is recommended. However, the physician-in-charge can overrule the qualification for home treatment or for hospitalization in case of major medical or social reasons. A justification explaining the cause of overruling is required.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The safety of the revised HOME-CoV score strategy for home treatment
Time Frame: 7 days

The rate of patients with evolution to severe COVID-19 within 7 days after inclusion among patients with a revised HOME-CoV score <2.

Severe COVID-19 is defined as a WHO-OSCI≥5, i.e., high flow nasal oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (5), intubation and invasive ventilation (6), other vital support (7), or all-cause death (8).

The revised HOME-CoV score strategy will be considered as safe if the rate of patients who experienced a WHO-OSCI≥5, will be ≤0.5% with an upper limit of the 95% confidence interval ≤1%.

7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The efficacy of the revised HOME-CoV score strategy for home treatment
Time Frame: 24 hours
The rate of patients treated at home,i.e., discharged home within 24 hours following inclusion.
24 hours
The applicability of the revised HOME-CoV score strategy for home treatment
Time Frame: 24 hours
the rate of patients treated at home, i.e., discharged home within 24 hours following inclusion, among patients with a revised HOME-CoV score <2
24 hours
The reliability of the revised HOME-CoV score strategy for home treatment
Time Frame: 7 days
The rate of patients with a revised HOME-CoV score < 2 and treated at home who were not subsequently hospitalized within the 7 days following inclusion.
7 days
The predictive performances of the revised HOME-CoV score of evolution towards a COVID-19 with a WHO-OSCI≥5.
Time Frame: 7 days

The rate of patients with a WHO-OSCI≥5 within the 7 days following inclusion, i.e., high flow nasal oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (5), intubation and invasive ventilation (6), other vital support (7) or all-cause death (8). The following parameters will be calculated: the area under the receiving operating curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio, negative predictive value and positive predictive value with <2 and >4 as cutoffs.

7 days

7 days
The predictive performances of the revised HOME-CoV score of evolution towards a COVID-19 with a WHO-OSCI≥6
Time Frame: 7 days

The rate of patients with a WHO-OSCI≥6 within the 7 days following inclusion, i.e., intubation and invasive ventilation (6), other vital support (7) or all-cause death (8).

The following parameters will be calculated: the area under the receiving operating curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio, negative predictive value and positive predictive value with <2 and >4 as cutoffs.

7 days
The predictive performances of the revised HOME-CoV score of evolution towards a fatal COVID-19
Time Frame: 7 days

The rate of patients who dead within the 7 days following inclusion

The following parameters will be calculated: the area under the receiving operating curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio, negative predictive value and positive predictive value with <2 and >4 as cutoffs.

7 days
Subgroup analysis in patients with confirmed COVID-19 (positive SARS-CoV2 RT-PCR) of the predictive performances of the revised HOME-CoV score
Time Frame: 7 days

The rate of patients with a WHO-OSCI≥5 within the 7 days following inclusion, i.e., high flow nasal oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (5), intubation and invasive ventilation (6), other vital support (7) or all-cause death (8).

The following parameters will be calculated: the area under the receiving operating curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio, negative predictive value and positive predictive value with <2 and >4 as cutoffs.

7 days
The predictive performances of the revised HOME-CoV score as compared to those of other prognostic scores for COVID-19
Time Frame: 7 days

The rate of patients with a WHO-OSCI≥5 within the 7 days following inclusion, i.e., high flow nasal oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation (5), intubation and invasive ventilation (6), other vital support (7) or all-cause death (8).

The following parameters will be calculated: the area under the receiving operating curve (AUROC)

7 days
Venous thrombo-embolism in COVID-19 patients (ancillary study)
Time Frame: 7 days
The rate of symptomatic and objectively confirmed deep venous thromboembolism or pulmonary embolism, and of unexplained sudden death occurring within the 7 days following ED admission.
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Medhi TAALBA, CHU Rouen
  • Principal Investigator: David DALL'ACQUA, Jacques Lacarin Hospital Center
  • Principal Investigator: Anyhony CHAUVIN, Ap-Hp Hopital Lariboisiere
  • Principal Investigator: Emmanuel MONTASSIER, CHU Nantes
  • Principal Investigator: Christian BRICE, CH St Brieuc
  • Principal Investigator: Frédéric BALEN, CHU Toulouse
  • Principal Investigator: Kasarra BEN HAMMOUDA, CH Colmar
  • Principal Investigator: Marc NOIZET, CHRU Mulhouse
  • Principal Investigator: Romain BLONDET, CH Mont de Marsan
  • Principal Investigator: Mustapha SEBBANE, University Hospital, Montpellier
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre-Clément THIEBAUD, AP-HP hôpital St Antoine
  • Principal Investigator: Marc ANDRONIKOF, AP-HP Hôpital Béclère
  • Principal Investigator: Esma OUMMAMAR, CH Le Mans
  • Principal Investigator: Laure ABENSUR VUILLAUME, CHRU Metz-Thionville
  • Principal Investigator: Henrinjatovo ANDRIANJAFY, Groupe Hospitalier Nord Essonne - Longjumeau
  • Principal Investigator: Yann-Erick CLAESSENS, CH Princesse Grace de Monaco
  • Principal Investigator: Pascal BISSOLOKELE, CH Libourne
  • Principal Investigator: Francis COUTURAUD, CHU Brest
  • Principal Investigator: Séverine GOSSELIN, CHU Dijon
  • Principal Investigator: Mathieu VIOLEAU, CH Niort
  • Principal Investigator: SCHMIDT Jeannot, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
  • Principal Investigator: Henri Hani KARAM, CHU Limoges
  • Principal Investigator: Meïssa KARE, CH Agen
  • Principal Investigator: Coralie CAYEUX, Ch Remiremont
  • Principal Investigator: Florent FREMY, Ap-Hp Hegp
  • Principal Investigator: Nicolas PESCHANSKI, CHU Rennes
  • Principal Investigator: Caroline SOULIE, CH Cholet
  • Principal Investigator: Ombeline SUSONG, GHT La Rochelle
  • Principal Investigator: Stéphane GENNAI, CHU Reims
  • Principal Investigator: Julie PERNET, AP-HP La Pitié-Salpétrière
  • Principal Investigator: Andrea PENALOZA, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc (Bruxelles)
  • Principal Investigator: Alexandre GHUYSEN, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege
  • Principal Investigator: Sonja CURAC, Hôpital Erasme (Bruxelles)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 8, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronavirus Infection

Clinical Trials on revised HOME-CoV score

Subscribe