- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04658056
UK Post-market Waterjet Ablation Therapy for Endoscopic Resection of Prostate Tissue
December 1, 2020 updated by: PROCEPT BioRobotics
The UK POST WATERStudy: UK Post-market Waterjet Ablation Therapy for Endoscopic Resection of Prostate Tissue
A post-market, non-interventional, two-arm, long-term follow-up study of patients previously enrolled in the WATER Study (NCT02505919) - which was a prospective multi-centre randomized blinded study comparing Aquablation of the prostate with the AQUABEAM Robotic System with standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Detailed Description
The study is a post-market, non-interventional, two-arm, long-term follow-up study of patients previously enrolled in the WATER Study (NCT02505919) - which was a prospective multi-centre randomized blinded study comparing Aquablation of the prostate with the AQUABEAM Robotic System with standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).
In POST WATER, up to 46 WATER Study subjects in the United Kingdom who were active on the study at 36 months will be invited to participate, across 3 clinical study sites in England and Wales.
The study will consist of one follow-up time-point at 60 months (5 years) from the time of initial WATER Study treatment date.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Anticipated)
46
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Surrey
-
Camberley, Surrey, United Kingdom, GU16 7UJ
- Frimley Park Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
45 years to 85 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Genders Eligible for Study
Male
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The target patient population is subjects who were enrolled in the WATER Study (with symptomatic BPH) who were randomized to treatment with either the Aquablation procedure or TURP.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject was randomized and received treatment in the WATER Study.
- Subject is mentally capable and willing to sign a study-specific informed consent form
- Subject is willing and able to comply with all study requirements
Exclusion Criteria:
Dementia or psychiatric condition that prevents the participant from completing required follow up 2. Participating in another investigational study that could affect responses to the study assessments
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
WATER AQUABEAM Robotic System cohort
WATER Study subjects previously-treated with Aquablation of the prostate with the AQUABEAM Robotic System for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH.
|
|
WATER TURPS cohort
WATER Study subjects previously-treated with standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with BPH.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Long-term effectiveness as measured by IPSS at 60 months
Time Frame: 60 months following original surgical intervention
|
International Prostate Symptom Score at 60 months as compared to baseline
|
60 months following original surgical intervention
|
|
Long-term safety as measured by adverse events at 60 months
Time Frame: 60 months following original surgical intervention
|
The proportion of subjects with adverse events classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade 2 or higher or any grade 1 event resulting in persistent disability
|
60 months following original surgical intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reoperation or Re-intervention at 60 months
Time Frame: 60 months
|
Reoperation or Re-intervention at 60 months
|
60 months
|
|
IPSS-QoL at 60 months
Time Frame: 60 months
|
International Prostate Symptom Score Quality of Life sub-score
|
60 months
|
|
Qmax at 60 months
Time Frame: 60 months
|
Uroflowmetry measurement of voided urine (in milliliters) per unit of time (in seconds)
|
60 months
|
|
PVR at 60 months
Time Frame: 60 months
|
Post-void residual urine test
|
60 months
|
|
Erectile function at 60 months
Time Frame: 60 months
|
IIEF-15 score
|
60 months
|
|
MSHQ-EjD at 60 months
Time Frame: 60 months
|
Assessment of ejaculatory function/dysfunction
|
60 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claus Roehrborn, MD, UT Southwestern Medical
- Principal Investigator: Peter Gilling, MD, Tauranga Urology Research Limited
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP Jr, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. Three-year outcomes after Aquablation therapy compared to TURP: results from a blinded randomized trial. Can J Urol. 2020 Feb;27(1):10072-10079.
- Gilling P, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Kaufman RP Jr, Trainer A, Arther A, Badlani G, Plante M, Desai M, Doumanian L, Te AE, DeGuenther M, Roehrborn C. Two-Year Outcomes After Aquablation Compared to TURP: Efficacy and Ejaculatory Improvements Sustained. Adv Ther. 2019 Jun;36(6):1326-1336. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00952-3. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
- Pimentel MA, Yassaie O, Gilling P. Urodynamic Outcomes After Aquablation. Urology. 2019 Apr;126:165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
- Gilling PJ, Barber N, Bidair M, Anderson P, Sutton M, Aho T, Kramolowsky E, Thomas A, Cowan B, Roehrborn C. Randomized Controlled Trial of Aquablation versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-year Outcomes. Urology. 2019 Mar;125:169-173. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
- Chughtai B, Thomas D. Pooled Aquablation Results for American Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Large Prostates (60-150 cc). Adv Ther. 2018 Jun;35(6):832-838. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0722-0. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
January 1, 2022
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
February 1, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 1, 2020
First Posted (ACTUAL)
December 8, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
December 8, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 1, 2020
Last Verified
December 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CSP0002
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
-
The Royal College of Surgeons of EnglandUniversity College, LondonCompletedUncomplicated Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
-
Clinical Academic Center (2CA-Braga)RecruitingBPH | LUTS(Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms)Portugal
-
Unidade Local de Saúde São JoãoNot yet recruitingLower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)
-
Bright UroRecruitingLower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS)United States
-
Peking University First HospitalTaiyuan Central Hospital of Shanxi Medical University; Peking University First...Not yet recruitingLUTS(Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms) | Acute Urinary RetentionChina
-
National Taiwan University HospitalUnknownDisorder of the Lower Urinary TractTaiwan
-
Fayoum University HospitalCompletedBPH with Other Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsEgypt
-
ProVerum MedicalActive, not recruiting
-
Baylor Research InstituteForte MedicalCompletedLower Urinary Tract Symptoms | Lower Urinary Tract InfectionUnited States
-
Far Eastern Memorial HospitalCompletedPsychiatric Aspects in Women With Lower Urinary Tract SymptomsTaiwan