Resource Optimization in the Intensive Care Unit Setting

December 3, 2023 updated by: Kwadwo Kyeremanteng, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Resource Optimization in the Intensive Care Unit Setting: A Staff Education and Scheduling Pilot Study to Improve Treatment Decisions and Staff Satisfaction

The purpose of the study is to facilitate cost-effective, high quality care within the the ICUs of two Ottawa teaching hospitals through educational workshops and nurse scheduling optimization.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This intervention pilot study has been developed for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) physicians and nurses by the Resource Optimization Network (RON) for implementation in The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) Civic Campus and the Montfort Hospital. The intervention targets ICU staff and is designed to reduce overall costs associated with ICU health care service delivery and improve staff satisfaction through reducing stress and associated burnout without sacrificing quality of care and patient outcomes. The intervention involves two components that (a) build ICU staffs' (i.e. physicians and nurses) knowledge to facilitate cost-effective and evidence-based decision making about patient care (including tests, treatments, and procedures); and (b) optimize nurse scheduling to ensure the presence of the appropriate number of nurses per shift, thereby reducing stress, burnout and limiting the need for overtime. To evaluate the impact of the intervention, a pre/post-intervention design will be employed, with a 3-month pre-intervention period, followed by a 6-month intervention period and a 3-month post-intervention period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

73

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Julia Hajjar, PhD (c)
  • Phone Number: 6132228251
  • Email: jhajjar@toh.ca

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Employees aged 18 year and older who provide direct patient care in the ICU at the Civic Campus of the Ottawa Hospital or the Montfort Hospital as physicians, nurses, or allied health professionals (e.g., respiratory therapists, occupational therapists).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ICU Staff
The study group is composed of ICU care providers at the Ottawa Hospital Civic campus and the Montfort Hospital, including intensivists, fellows, nurses and allied health professionals. The study site participant breakdown is approximately 58 TOH staff respondents and 15 Montfort respondents.
The intervention consists of providing educational content for all ICU care providers concerning building staff knowledge surrounding methods to facilitate cost-effective and evidence-based decision-making about patient care (including tests, treatments, and procedures). The first intervention is an educational workshop to increase staffs' awareness of the current Choosing Wisely Canada Critical Care strategies and recommendations to facilitate cost-effective and evidence-based decision-making about patient care (including tests, treatments, and procedures).
This initiative will focus solely on the nurse subgroup and concerns schedule optimization to ensure the presence of the appropriate number of nurses per shift, thereby reducing stress, burnout and limiting the need for overtime.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU Costs
Time Frame: 12 months
Case costing will be used to determine the costs associated with ICU care during the study period, including: a) ICU total costs; b) ICU direct costs (i.e., all expenses to the hospital with fee codes linked to patient chart); c) ICU indirect costs (i.e., any overhead operational fees associated with service provided to patient); d) ICU cost/patient.
12 months
ICU Quality Metric 1: Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Time Frame: 12 months
This outcome will be included to evaluate the quality of ICU patient care during the study period. The number of patients who develop ventilator associated pneumonia will be collected from the TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 months
ICU Quality Metric 2: Central Line Infections
Time Frame: 12 Months
This outcome will be included to evaluate the quality of ICU patient care during the study period. The number of patients who develop central line infections will be collected from the TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
ICU Quality Metric 3: C. difficile
Time Frame: 12 Months
This outcome will be included to evaluate the quality of ICU patient care during the study period. The number of patients who develop C. difficile infections will be collected from the TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
ICU Quality Metric 4: Early Mobilization
Time Frame: 12 Months
This outcome will be included to evaluate the quality of ICU patient care during the study period. The number of patients who receive early mobilization will be collected from the TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU Patient Outcomes 1: Length of Stay
Time Frame: 12 Months
Metrics for evaluation concerning patient outcomes include measurement of length of stay within the ICU in days, or LOS. Patient data used for this analysis will be collected from TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
ICU Patient Outcomes 2: Patient Deaths
Time Frame: 12 Months
Metrics for evaluation concerning patient outcomes include measurement of the number of patients who die within the ICU. Patient data used for this analysis will be collected from TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
ICU Patient Outcomes 3: Perceived Quality of Care
Time Frame: 12 Months
Metrics for evaluation concerning patient outcomes include measurement of the quality of care perceived by patients and their families. Data used for this analysis will be collected from TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
ICU Medical Procedures 1: Albumin Use
Time Frame: 12 Months
Metrics for evaluation concerning ICU medical procedures specifically targeted in the educational intervention component include the rate of albumin used per ICU admission (bags of albumin used/admission). Patient data used for this analysis will be collected from TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
ICU Medical Procedures 2: Mechanical Ventilation
Time Frame: 12 Months
Metrics for evaluation concerning ICU medical procedures specifically targeted in the educational intervention component include the number of patients mechanically ventilated, and the duration of their ventilation in days. Patient data used for this analysis will be collected from TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
ICU Medical Procedures 3: Chest Radiographs
Time Frame: 12 Months
Metrics for evaluation concerning ICU medical procedures specifically targeted in the educational intervention component include the number of ICU patient chest radiographs completed per day. Patient data used for this analysis will be collected from TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
ICU Medical Procedures 4: Red Blood Cell Transfusions
Time Frame: 12 Months
Metrics for evaluation concerning ICU medical procedures specifically targeted in the educational intervention component include the rate of red blood cell transfusions per admission. The amount of red blood cell transfusions administered (measured in bags/admission) will be monitored throughout ICU admission. Patient data used for this analysis will be collected from TOH Data Warehouse and Montfort's Department of Archives and Decision Support.
12 Months
Rate of ICU Staff Absenteeism
Time Frame: 12 Months
We will collect data on ICU full-time staff absenteeism during the study period from the Data Warehouse and Montfort Archives.
12 Months
Stakeholder perceptions
Time Frame: 12 Months
8-15 ICU stakeholder staff with special knowledge of ICU activities will be recruited for post-interventional interviews. The semi-structured interviews will be conducted by trained research staff and will use the Post-Intervention Semi-Structured Interview Guide to assess the stakeholders' perceptions of intervention outcomes. Stakeholders will be asked open-ended questions about their knowledge of the interventions implemented during the study period, their perceptions of the outcomes of these interventions, and any perceived changes in ICU care delivery in time period that corresponds to the post-intervention phase of the study. The interview will last approximately 30 minutes and will be digitally recorded and transcribed. Specific topics of discussion include introduction, participant's definition/perception of their field, quality of care, team morale/staff satisfaction and final thoughts/comments.
12 Months
Staff Demographic Variable Collection 1
Time Frame: 12 months

A 15-20 minute self-administered online questionnaire will be used to obtain demographic information. It will include 9 questions, 6 of which are qualitative such as ICU role, part time or full time status, types of shifts worked, age group, gender identity (optional), and staff turnover.

The 3 quantitative questions are measured from 0-5, where 0 is strongly disagree/very dissatisfied and 5 is strongly agree/very satisfied.

Satisfaction relates to both job satisfaction and perceptions on whether staffing is efficient and promotes quality of care.

Perceptions on quality of care will be measured based on agreement with the statement "there are adequate support services to allow sufficient patient interactions".

Team morale has 3 sub questions: whether ICU physicians, nurses and allied health professional have good working relations, whether supervisory staff is supportive of ICU staff and whether there is sufficient teamwork between health care professionals.

12 months
Staff Demographic Variable Collection 2
Time Frame: 12 months

The Education Evaluation Survey will be administered at the end of the workshop and emailed the day after to obtain post-intervention data. Participants will identify their job position and any prior knowledge relating to test/treatment/procedure misuse in Canadian hospitals. They will detail their comfort prior to the workshop in engaging in conversations with patients about reducing unnecessary standard tests/treatments.

Questions 4-8 can be answered by agree, neutral, disagree, don't know/non-applicable.

I enjoyed the workshop, topic and lecture. I enjoyed the discussion among my peers. I have an increased awareness of what standard tests, treatments and procedures may be unnecessary or even harmful to my patients. I feel more comfortable about sharing knowledge with my peers and patients about what standard tests, treatments and procedures may be unnecessary or even harmful to my patients. I am more likely to engage in reflexive practices related to my healthcare practice.

12 months
Staff Stress Levels and Burnout 1
Time Frame: 12 months

The short self-administered online questionnaire will evaluate ICU staff stress and burnout, as well as demographic variables discussed above. It will contain questions from the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).

The PSS consists of 10 questions, answered on a scale of 0-4 depending on the frequency of which the behavior is observed, with 0 indicating "never" and 4 indicating "very often". Overall, a score of 0 indicates low stress, while a score of 40 indicates an individual with high perceived stress levels.

12 months
Staff Stress Levels and Burnout 2
Time Frame: 12 months

The short self-administered online questionnaire will evaluate ICU staff stress and burnout, as well as demographic variables discussed above. It will contain questions from the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI).

The MBI is a 22 question survey which evaluates 3 subscales; emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and reduced personal accomplishment. Each question is rated from 1 to 5, where 1 is strongly disagree and 5 is strongly agree. A high score on the emotional exhaustion subscale (27+) coupled with a high score on the depersonalization scale (10+) indicates that the individual may be experiencing 1+ symptoms of burnout.

12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burnout, Professional

Clinical Trials on Educational Workshop

Subscribe