RCT of Fomitopsis Officinalis and Trametes Versicolor to Treat COVID-19 (MACH19)

August 15, 2025 updated by: Gordon Saxe

Multicenter Double Blind, Placebo Controlled RCT of Fomitopsis Officinalis and Trametes Versicolor to Treat COVID-19

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate two polypore mushrooms, Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor (FoTv), to treat COVID-19-positive outpatients with mild-to-moderate symptoms assigned to self-quarantined and home management. The study aims to establish the safety and feasibility of the use of FoTv vs placebo in 66 total subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite biomedical advances, medical intervention for COVID-19 is largely limited to vaccinations and supportive care during the later stages of disease. While antiviral, anti-inflammatory, and antimalarial options have been explored for later stages of disease, fewer studies have been conducted on medications to reduce the risk of outpatient cases progressing to severe disease. Therefore, it is important that we broaden the search to include agents outside of our usual pharmacopeia. Integrative Medicine offers several promising therapeutics that are available today and warrant investigation.

Some of the botanicals used for their possible immune modulating functions include polypore mushrooms. Among these, Turkey Tail (Trametes versicolor) has a long history of use for its immune supporting properties. An RCT examining the effects of Trametes versicolor in breast cancer patients detected increases in lymphocyte counts and natural killer cell functional activity (Torkelson et al, 2012 and Benson et al, 2019) both of which are key to host COVID-19 response. Further investigations into other relevant mushroom species demonstrated that Agarikon (Fomitopsis officinalis) can strongly induce an array of differential cytokine responses associated with both immune-activation and resolution of host defense- induced inflammatory reactions (unpublished). This homeostatic effect deserves attention for COVID-19 given the high mortality rate associated with cytokine storm.

This is a multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate two polypore mushrooms, Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor (FoTv), to treat COVID-19-positive outpatients with mild-to-moderate symptoms assigned to self-quarantined and home management. This study aims to establish the safety and feasibility of the use of FoTv vs placebo in 66 total subjects. Subsequent trials will evaluate Chinese herbal medicine as well as the efficacy of FoTv in a larger study population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92093
        • University of California, San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Positive COVID-19 diagnosis within the prior 72 hours
  • Age 18 years and older
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum hCG. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening and agree to use contraception throughout the study period.
  • Capable of documenting vitals, symptoms, and study product intake daily and communicating this information to the study team
  • Willing to avoid alcohol, cannabis, and dairy products during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any of the following symptoms which, according to the CDC, require hospitalization:

    1. Trouble breathing
    2. Persistent pain or pressure in the chest
    3. New confusion or inability to arouse
    4. Bluish lips or face
  • Current use of investigational agents to prevent or treat COVID-19
  • Known liver disease (ALT/AST >3x ULN or diagnosis of cirrhosis)
  • Known renal disease (eGFR < 60 ml/min) or acute nephritis.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (SBP>140 or DBP>90 while on medications)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Organic brown rice
8 capsules three times a day for 14 consecutive days.
Other Names:
  • Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor
Experimental: Mushrooms
Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor
8 capsules three times a day for 14 consecutive days.
Other Names:
  • Fomitopsis officinalis and Trametes versicolor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Protein Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
Albumin Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
Alkaline Phosphatase Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
AST Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
ALT Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
Bilirubin Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
Adj. EGFR Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
Prothrombin Time Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
APTT Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
ESR Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
CRP Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days
LDH Normal to Abnormal Transition
Time Frame: 14 days
We examined participants who were normal at Baseline (Day 1). The Normal to Abnormal proportion reflects the proportion of participants with normal values at Day 1 that became abnormal at Day 14 relative to all participants with normal values at baseline.
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Bilirubin
Time Frame: 14 days
comparison of the Total Bilirubin of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
14 days
Prothrombin Time
Time Frame: 14 days
comparison of the prothrombin time of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
14 days
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)
Time Frame: 14 days
Comparison of the aspartate transaminase of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
14 days
Alanine Transaminase (ALT)
Time Frame: 14 days
The safety of the study medication will also assessed by a comparison of the alanine transaminase of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients)
14 days
Albumin
Time Frame: 14 days
comparing Albumin of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
14 days
Alkaline Phosphatase
Time Frame: 14 days
comparing the Alkaline Phosphatase of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs
14 days
Lactate Dehydrogenase
Time Frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the serum Lactate Dehydrogenase level of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
14 days
C-Reactive Protein
Time Frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the serum C-Reactive Protein level of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
14 days
Mid-turbinate SARS CoV-2 Viral Load
Time Frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by changes in the SARS CoV-2 viral loads among mid-turbinate nasal swabs taken on days 0, 4, 7 and 14.
14 days
Adj. EGFR
Time Frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the Adj. EGFR of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
14 days
APTT
Time Frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the APTT of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
14 days
INR
Time Frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the INR of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients). The INR is a result of a blood test that measures how long it takes for blood to clot, also known as the prothrombin time (PT). The INR is calculated by comparing the PT to the mean normal prothrombin time (MNPT).
14 days
ESR
Time Frame: 14 days
A secondary exploratory objective will be to evaluate COVID-19 severity among subjects in each of the two medication arms, compared with placebo, as ascertained by comparing the ESR of baseline laboratory data with end-of-treatment labs or on hospital admission labs (for hospitalized patients).
14 days
Symptom Count
Time Frame: 14 days
Symptom severity was assessed via a daily questionnaire across Days 0-14, where participants rated their symptoms on a scale of 0 (none or absent) to 3 (severe). A composite measure was created for each day, based on the 12 symptoms most commonly associated with COVID-19 (fever, fatigue, muscle aches, shortness of breath, shortness of breath upon exertion, cough, sore throat, stuffy nose, runny nose, loss of taste, loss of smell, headache), and counting the total number of symptoms present. scores of 1 or more were considered to be present.
14 days
Symptom Severities
Time Frame: 14 days
Symptom severity was assessed via a daily questionnaire across Days 0-14, where participants rated their symptoms on a scale of 0 (none or absent) to 3 (severe). A composite measure was created for each day, based on the 12 symptoms most commonly associated with COVID-19 (fever, fatigue, muscle aches, shortness of breath, shortness of breath upon exertion, cough, sore throat, stuffy nose, runny nose, loss of taste, loss of smell, headache), and summing the total symptom severities. Higher symptom severities indicates a worse outcome. The minimum and maximum were: 0 to 36, respectively.
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Shubov, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 21, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on FoTv

Subscribe