- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04676672
A PMCF Study in Patients With Acute or Chronic Aortic Dissection or Aortic Aneurysm Treated With E-vita OPEN NEO (NEOS)
NEOS - A Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study in Patients With Acute or Chronic Aortic Dissection or Aortic Aneurysm Treated With E-vita OPEN NEO
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In this study, patients will be observed who receive an E-vita OPEN NEO implant for the treatment of thoracic aneurysm or acute or chronic thoracic dissection. E-vita OPEN NEO will be implanted according to the instructions for use and at the discretion of the treating physician.
Participating physicians will provide their observations collected during routine care for patients treated with E-vita OPEN NEO. Written informed consent, specifically allowing the use of clinical records for this observational study, will be obtained from every patient prior to data collection.
The period of data collection will be approximately 60 months from the date of intervention for each patient. Source data verification will be performed on 100% of the patients; data from all the visits that was provided in the database will be reviewed and verified against existing source documents. Complete DICOM image files of the CT scans will be sent to the CoreLab for independent evaluation. All adverse events defined prior to study start will be adjudicated by the Clinical Event Committee (CEC).
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient´s age is between 18 and 75 years.
- Patient is willing and able to comply with the standard follow-up visits planned after the implantation procedure.
- Patient is willing and able to give informed consent.
- Patient satisfies one of the following categories:
- Patient has acute / subacute aortic dissection and requires repair or replacement of damaged or diseased vessels of the aortic arch (with or without involvement of the ascending aorta), and the descending aorta requires treatment, or, in the opinion of the investigator, the patient would derive clinical benefit from prophylactic treatment of the descending aorta.
- Patient has chronic aortic dissection which requires repair or replacement of damaged or diseased vessels of the aortic arch and descending aorta with or without involvement of the ascending aorta, and the patient satisfies one or more of the following criteria:
Patient has aortic sinus, or ascending aorta, or aortic arch, or descending aorta diameter ≥ 5.5 cm.
Patient has aorta diameter < 5.5 cm and a growth rate of ≥ 0.5 cm / year. Patient has ascending aorta diameter ≥ 4.5 cm and requires an aortic valve repair or replacement.
Patient has clinical signs of abdominal or peripheral malperfusion.
- Patient has a fusiform or saccular aortic aneurysm which requires repair or replacement of damaged or diseased vessels of the aortic arch and descending aorta with or without involvement of the ascending aorta, and patient satisfies the following criteria:
Patient has a suitable distal sealing area in the descending thoracic aorta proximal to the celiac trunk.
And in case of fusiform aneurysm one of the following characteristics:
Patient has aortic sinus, or ascending aorta, or aortic arch, or descending aorta diameter ≥ 5.5 cm.
Patient has aorta diameter < 5.5 cm and a growth rate of ≥ 0.5 cm / year. Patient has ascending aorta diameter ≥ 4.5 cm and requires an aortic valve repair or replacement.
- Patient is hemodynamically stable without pharmacological support at time of admission to the hospital (stable blood pressure and heart rate, no shock).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is unfit for open surgical repair involving circulatory arrest.
- Patient has known sensitivities or allergies to nitinol, polyester, platinum-iridium, or polyethylene.
- Patient has systemic infection.
- Patient has endocarditis or active infection of the aorta.
- Patient has a free ruptured aorta.
- Patient has acute stroke or suspected acute stroke.
- Patient is on inotropes at time of arrival to the hospital.
- Patient needs mitral valve repair or replacement.
- Patient is enrolled or plans to be enrolled in another active study.
- Patient is pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.
- Patient has uncorrectable bleeding anomaly (i.e., thrombocytopenia).
- Patient has an eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73m2 before the intervention
- Patient has known sensitivity to radiopaque contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-treated.
- Patient has co-morbidity (i.e. active malignancy (progressive, stable or partial remission)) causing expected survival to be less than 3 years.
- Patient has any other medical, social or psychological problems, that in the opinion of the investigator, preclude the patient from participating in this study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: 30-day
|
Rate of all-cause mortality
|
30-day
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of all-cause mortality
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Mortality
Time Frame: 30-day, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of aortic related mortality
|
30-day, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Major Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Rate of patients who are free from Major Adverse Events (MAEs) (new permanent disabling stroke (mRS ≥ 2 and at baseline mRS < 2), new permanent (> 30 days) paraplegia or paraparesis, reintervention (excluding reoperation for bleeding or planned or unplanned additional intervention), all-cause mortality)
|
12 months
|
|
Device technical success
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Rate of patients with device technical success
|
24 hours
|
|
Procedural success
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days
|
Rate of patients with procedural success
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days
|
|
Treatment success
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with treatment success
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Aortic rupture
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with aortic rupture
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Additional intervention
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with planned or unplanned additional intervention
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Reintervention
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with reintervention
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Disabling stroke
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with new disabling stroke
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Paraplegia
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with new permanent (> 30 days) paraplegia
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Paraparesis
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with new permanent (> 30 days) paraparesis
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Renal failure
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with renal failure requiring permanent (> 90 days) dialysis or hemofiltration in a patient with a normal pre-procedure serum creatinine level
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Aortic regurgitation
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with increase in aortic regurgitation grade of greater than 1 compared to pre-operative measurement
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Stenosis
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with stenosis in the supra-aortic head vessels (0 - 30 %, >30 % - 50 %, > 50 % - 70%, > 70%)
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Patency
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with patent supra-aortic head vessels
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Migration
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with retrograde migration > 10 mm of the distal end of the stented part of E-vita OPEN NEO
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Integrity
Time Frame: At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with failure of integrity of the E-vita OPEN NEO
|
At discharge, an avarage of 30 days, 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Endoleak type Ib (aneurysm)
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an endoleak type Ib
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Endoleak type II (aneurysm)
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an endoleak type II
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Endoleak type III (aneurysm)
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an endoleak type III
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Endoleak type IV (aneurysm)
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an endoleak type IV
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Increasing aortic diameter
Time Frame: 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with aneurysm that have an increasing maximum aortic diameter in the stented region (E-vita OPEN NEO) compared to first post-operative CT
|
12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Stable aortic diameter
Time Frame: 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with aneurysm that have a stable maximum aortic diameter in the stented region (E-vita OPEN NEO) compared to first post-operative CT
|
12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Decreasing aortic diameter
Time Frame: 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with aneurysm that have a decreasing maximum aortic diameter in the stented region (E-vita OPEN NEO) compared to first post-operative CT
|
12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Endoleak type Ib (dissection)
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with dissection that have an endoleak type Ib
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Endoleak II (dissection)
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with dissection that have an endoleak type II
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Endoleak type R (dissection)
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with dissection that have an endoleak type R
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Increasing or stable true lumen size
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with increasing (≥ 5 mm) or stable true lumen in the stented region
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Stable or decreasing false lumen size
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with stable or decreasing (≤ - 5 mm) false lumen in the stented region
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Obliterated false lumen in stented region
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with obliterated false lumen in the stented region
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Completely thrombosed false lumen in stented region
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with completely thrombosed false lumen in the stented region
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Partially thrombosed false lumen in stented region
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with partially thrombosed false lumen in the stented region
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Patent false lumen in stented region
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with patent false lumen in the stented region
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Obliterated false lumen between stent and celiac trunk
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with obliterated false lumen between the bottom of the stent and the celiac trunk
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Completely thrombosed false lumen between stent and celiac trunk
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with completely thrombosed false lumen between the bottom of the stent and the celiac trunk
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Patent false lumen between stent and celiac trunk
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with patent false lumen between the bottom of the stent and the celiac trunk
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Obliterated false lumen between celiac trunk and aortic bifurcation
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with obliterated false lumen between the celiac trunk and the aortic bifurcation
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Completely thrombosed false lumen between celiac trunk and aortic bifurcation
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with completely thrombosed false lumen between the celiac trunk and the aortic bifurcation
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Partially thrombosed false lumen between celiac trunk and aortic bifurcation
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with partially thrombosed false lumen between the celiac trunk and the aortic bifurcation
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Patent false lumen between celiac trunk and aortic bifurcation
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with patent false lumen between the celiac trunk and the aortic bifurcation
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
|
Partially thrombosed false lumen between stent and celiac trunk
Time Frame: 3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Rate of patients with partially thrombosed false lumen between the bottom of the stent and the celiac trunk
|
3-6, 12, 24, 36, 60 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Martin Grabenwöger, Prof., Klinikum Floridsdorf
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- NEOS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aortic Aneurysm
-
University of BolognaCompletedThoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm | Ruptured Thoracic Aneurysm | Ruptured Aortic Aneurysm | Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm, RupturedItaly
-
W.L.Gore & AssociatesCMIC Co, Ltd. JapanRecruitingThoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm | Pararenal Aortic AneurysmJapan
-
Baptist Health South FloridaBolton Medical; William Cook AustraliaRecruitingThoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm | Aortic Arch AneurysmUnited States
-
Karolinska University HospitalKarolinska Institutet; Swedish Heart Lung FoundationActive, not recruitingAortic Aneurysm | Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal | Abdominal AneurysmSweden
-
University of California, DavisUniversity of California, San DiegoRecruitingJuxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm | Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm | Pararenal Aortic Aneurysm | Complex Abdominal Aortic AneurysmUnited States
-
Aiatella OyRecruitingAortic Aneurysm | Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal | Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal | Aortic Aneurysm and DissectionUnited States, Brazil
-
University of South FloridaMedtronic; Sanford HealthActive, not recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicNot yet recruiting
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCook Group Incorporated; UNC HospitalsEnrolling by invitationAortic Aneurysm, Abdominal | Aortic Arch Aneurysm | Ascending Aorta AneurysmUnited States
-
Rede Optimus Hospitalar SAShockwave Medical, Inc.RecruitingThoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Without Mention of Rupture | Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Without Rupture | Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Without RuptureItaly, Germany, Switzerland
Clinical Trials on Open repair
-
University of CalgaryCanadian Orthopaedic Foundation; Workers' Compensation Board, AlbertaCompleted
-
Imperial College LondonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; The Leeds Teaching Hospitals... and other collaboratorsCompletedAbdominal Aortic AneurysmUnited Kingdom, Canada
-
Uppsala University HospitalTyco Healthcare Group; Stig and Ragna Gorthon FoundationCompleted
-
Boston Medical CenterTerminatedPopliteal Artery AneurysmUnited States
-
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityRecruitingChronic Pain | Inguinal Hernia | Ventral Hernia | Umbilical Hernia | Femoral Hernia | Acute Post Operative Pain | Recrrence RateRussian Federation
-
University Paul Sabatier of ToulouseRecruitingPost Operative Quality of Life After AAA SurgeryFrance
-
JOTEC GmbHRecruitingVascular DiseasesGermany
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedAortic AneurysmUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknown
-
Kuopio University HospitalUnknownChronic Pain | Bone Marrow OedemaFinland