Lung Ultrasound to Assess Aeration Loss After Lung Resection Surgery (THORUS)

June 16, 2026 updated by: Ana Broseta Lleó

Lung Ultrasound Assessment of Aeration Changes After Lung Resection Surgery: A Pilot Study

The purpose of this prospective observational study is to assess perioperative changes in lung aeration after lung resection surgery using lung ultrasound, and to explore their relationship with oxygenation, inflammatory biomarkers, cardiac stress markers and diaphragmatic function.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Postoperative pulmonary complications are common after lung resection surgery and are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a bedside, non-invasive and repeatable imaging technique that can detect regional changes in lung aeration. These changes may reflect postoperative loss of aeration related to one-lung ventilation, surgical manipulation, lung collapse and re-expansion, inflammatory response, diaphragmatic dysfunction or other perioperative mechanisms.

This is a prospective, single-centre, observational pilot study including consecutive adult patients scheduled for elective lung resection surgery under one-lung ventilation. Lung ultrasound was performed at three predefined time points: before surgery (T1), 30 minutes after extubation (T2), and 24 hours after surgery (T3). Each hemithorax was divided into six regions: anterior, lateral and posterior areas, each subdivided into upper and lower zones. For each examination, the most pathological ultrasound finding in each area was recorded. A semiquantitative lung ultrasound score was calculated to assess lung aeration over time, both globally and separately for the operated and non-operated lung. Corrected LUSS values were used to compensate for the loss of areas after surgery.

At the same predefined time points, oxygenation, NT-proBNP and plasma inflammatory biomarkers, including IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α, were assessed. Bedside transthoracic echocardiography and diaphragmatic ultrasound were also performed as exploratory analyses to evaluate possible cardiovascular and diaphragmatic mechanisms associated with postoperative loss of lung aeration.

The primary objective of the study is to assess perioperative changes in lung aeration after lung resection surgery using LUS. Secondary objectives are to describe the regional distribution of LUS findings, compare the operated and non-operated lung, assess the feasibility of repeated perioperative LUS examinations, and explore the relationship between LUS changes and oxygenation, inflammatory biomarkers, cardiac stress markers and diaphragmatic function.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Valencia
      • Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46014
        • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients scheduled for elective lung resection surgery at a tertiary referral hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18
  • ASA I-III
  • Non-small cell lung neoplasm
  • Elective lobectomy
  • Under one-lung ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • Diagnosed pulmonary fibrosis
  • Scheduled surgery limited to biopsy
  • Surgery that includes resection of the thoracic wall or the diaphragm
  • Predicted FEV1 < 40%
  • Neoplasm metastasis
  • Obesity class II or more (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m^2)
  • Risk of malnutrition CONUT score > 1
  • Hemoglobin < 10 g/dl
  • Chronic kidney failure: glomerular filtration < 60 ml/min/m^2, nephrectomy, kidney transplantation
  • Treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressive agents 3 months before surgery
  • Transfusion of blood products during the previous 10 days
  • Heart failure (New York Heart Association Functional Class 3 or 4) during the week before surgery.
  • Heart valve diseases over stage B of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines 2014
  • Previously documented elevated left atrial pressure or cardiac disease associated with elevated left-sided filling pressures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Lung resection surgery
Adult patients scheduled for elective lobectomy surgery under one-lung ventilation in a tertiary referral hospital.
Lung ultrasound was performed at three predefined perioperative time points: before surgery, in the immediate postoperative period after extubation, and 24 hours after surgery. Each hemithorax was assessed in six regions, and lung aeration was evaluated using a semiquantitative lung ultrasound score.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in lung aeration after lung resection surgery assessed by lung ultrasound score
Time Frame: preoperative vs immediate postoperative period vs 24 hours after surgery
The lung ultrasound score is a semiquantitative score used to assess lung aeration. Higher values indicate greater loss of aeration. Changes will be assessed between the preoperative period, the immediate postoperative period after extubation, and 24 hours after surgery.
preoperative vs immediate postoperative period vs 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Regional distribution of lung ultrasound findings in the operated and non-operated lung
Time Frame: preoperative vs immediate postoperative period vs 24 hours after surgery
Description of lung ultrasound findings and lung aeration loss in each lung region at the predefined perioperative time points.
preoperative vs immediate postoperative period vs 24 hours after surgery
Changes in oxygenation after lung resection surgery
Time Frame: preoperative vs immediate postoperative vs 24 hours after surgery
Oxygenation will be assessed using the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio at the predefined perioperative time points.
preoperative vs immediate postoperative vs 24 hours after surgery
Changes in plasma inflammatory biomarkers after lung resection surgery
Time Frame: preoperative vs immediate postoperative vs 24 hours after surgery
Plasma IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α concentrations, and the IL-6/IL-10 ratio, will be assessed at the predefined perioperative time points.
preoperative vs immediate postoperative vs 24 hours after surgery
Changes in cardiac stress markers after lung resection surgery
Time Frame: preoperative vs immediate postoperative vs 24 hours after surgery
NT-proBNP values will be assessed at the predefined perioperative time points and explored in relation to lung ultrasound findings.
preoperative vs immediate postoperative vs 24 hours after surgery
Changes in diaphragmatic function after lung resection surgery
Time Frame: preoperative vs immediate postoperative vs 24 hours after surgery
Diaphragmatic function will be assessed by ultrasound using diaphragmatic thickening fraction at the predefined perioperative time points.
preoperative vs immediate postoperative vs 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ana Broseta Lleó, Consultant, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Perioperative lung ultrasound assessment

3
Subscribe