Effects of Body Position and Recruiting Maneuver on Lung Aeration Assessed Through Ultrasound in Patients Intubated for Acute Respiratory Failure Related to Novel Coronavirus 19 Disease

January 29, 2024 updated by: Prof Gianmaria Cammarota, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia
Second analysis of data prospectively collected during an investigation assessing the clinical characteristics of patients admitted for hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) related to novel coronavirus 19 disease (COVID-19). In particular, the primary aim of the present analysis is to assess the effects of recruiting maneuver and prone positioning on lung aeration evaluated through lung ultrasound in patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Umbria, Italy
      • Perugia, Umbria, Italy, Italy, 06156
        • Università degli Studi di Perugia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients intubated for COVID-19 hARF -

Exclusion Criteria: Any contraindication to recruitment and lung ultrasound, pregnancy

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Lung ultrasound

n patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation with an arterial oxygen tension on inspired oxygen fraction ratio < 200 mmHg requiring recruitment maneuver and prone positioning as a rescue therapy, lung aeration will be evaluated at:

baseline, in supine position under protective ventilation after two minute of recruitment maneuver in pressure controlled ventilation at 1 hour following prone positioning application

In patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation with an arterial oxygen tension on inspired oxygen fraction ratio < 200 mmHg requiring recruitment maneuver and prone positioning as a rescue therapy, lung aeration will be evaluated at:

  1. baseline, in supine position under protective ventilation
  2. after two minute of recruitment maneuver in pressure controlled ventilation
  3. at 1 hour following prone positioning application

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
lung ultrasound score
Time Frame: after 20 minutes following study entry, in volume controll ventilation and supine position
lung aeration evaluated through ultrasound during protective invasive mechanical in supine position. Lung ultrasound score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 36, where 0 is the best lung aeration and 36 is the worst lung aeration
after 20 minutes following study entry, in volume controll ventilation and supine position
lung ultrasound score recruitment
Time Frame: 2 minutes
lung aeration evaluated through ultrasound during protective invasive mechanical ventilation in supine position after two minutes of recruiting maneuver in pressure controlled ventilation. Lung ultrasound score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 36, where 0 is the best lung aeration and 36 is the worst lung aeration
2 minutes
lung ultrasound score prone positioning
Time Frame: 1 hour
lung aeration evaluated through ultrasound during protective invasive mechanical ventilation after 1 h from prone position application. Lung ultrasound score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 36, where 0 is the best lung aeration and 36 is the worst lung aeration
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on lung ultrasound assessment

Subscribe