- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04679207
A Pilot Study of Ultrasound-guided Vacuum-assisted Excision of Breast Cancers (PICASSO)
January 17, 2023 updated by: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
A Pilot Study of Ultrasound-guided Vacuum-assisted Excision of Breast Cancers (the PICASSO Study)
This study is looking into whether the procedure called Vacuum Assisted Excision (VAE) is a safe method for the removal of small and medium sized invasive breast cancers in patients who are unfit or have refused to have surgery to remove cancer.
Recruitment Target: 20
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
7
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WU
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Adult patients who require a safe method for the removal of small and medium sized invasive breast cancers in patients who are unfit or have refused to have surgery to remove cancer.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient is aged 18 years or older.
- Diagnosis on core needle biopsy of invasive cancer of the breast
- Unifocal invasive tumour on imaging (hormone receptor positive or negative)
- T1 or T2 primary or locally recurrent tumour measuring ≤25mm on imaging, excluding any adjacent ductal carcinoma in situ (largest of the measurements on mammography (including digital breast tomosynthesis if performed) and ultrasound)
- The tumour is clearly visible on ultrasound
- Vacuum-assisted excision of the entire ultrasonically visible tumour is deemed to be technically feasible
- The patient is considered to be at high risk of complications or death from a general anaesthetic and therefore surgery under general anaesthesia is not considered appropriate. This must be confirmed by agreement by two named consultant breast surgeons, a multidisciplinary team meeting (including at least one consultant breast surgeon) or by formal anaesthetic assessment. Unsuitability for surgery under local anaesthetic must be confirmed by a consultant breast surgeon.
- or - The patient refuses to undergo surgery. This must be confirmed by a consultant surgeon and breast care nurse following full discussion of the treatment options.
- or - The patient is considered unlikely to benefit from surgical removal of the cancer by virtue of known metastatic disease or other life-shortening condition. This must be confirmed by discussion in a multidisciplinary team meeting which includes an oncologist.
- The patient has given written informed consent for the study Women who are already on primary endocrine therapy for a breast cancer and meet the inclusion criteria will also be eligible.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient is on anticoagulants or has a known clotting disorder
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Allergy to local anaesthetic
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Greatest dimension of the Cancer
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The proportion of participants in whom the greatest dimension of the cancer on imaging at 1 year post-vacuum assisted excision (VAE) is ≤50% of its pre-VAE size.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recruitment Uptake
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Proportion of eligible women offered the study who consent to participate.
|
12 months
|
|
Procedure Times
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Time taken for each VAE procedure.
|
12 months
|
|
Procedure pain and acceptability
Time Frame: 12 months
|
11-point numerical rating pain score - with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable
|
12 months
|
|
Complication rate of VAE
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Proportion of women who have significant bleeding after the procedure (defined as bleeding requiring > 20 minutes manual compression to control and/or a haematoma requiring aspiration or surgical evacuation) or infection at the VAE site (defined as requiring antibiotic treatment and/or an abscess requiring aspiration or surgery).
|
12 months
|
|
Proportion of Cancer removed
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Proportion of women in whom the cancer appears to be completely removed as judged on ultrasound at the end of the VAE procedure
|
12 months
|
|
Residual Cancer after VAE
Time Frame: 2 years post VAE
|
Proportion of participants in whom the greatest dimension of the cancer on imaging at 2 years post-VAE is less ≤ 50% of its pre-VAE size.
|
2 years post VAE
|
|
Requirement of salvage surgery
Time Frame: 2 years post VAE
|
Proportion of participants who undergo surgery to the ipsilateral breast within 2 years of the VAE procedure because of continued growth of the tumour.
|
2 years post VAE
|
|
Histopathology of cavity walls
Time Frame: Imaging at 1 year and 2 years.
|
Proportion of participants with positive and negative cavity wall biopsies respectively who have tumour visible on imaging at 1 and 2 years.
|
Imaging at 1 year and 2 years.
|
|
proportion willing to undergo the procedure again if necessary.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
proportion willing to undergo the procedure again if necessary based on yes or no question
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 25, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
May 31, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 25, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 17, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
December 22, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 18, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 17, 2023
Last Verified
January 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- B00157
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.