Evaluation of Ice Cream Cone Technique With Immediate Implant Placement in Patients With Labial Plate Dehiscence

December 25, 2020 updated by: Mostafa Amagad, Cairo University

Evaluation of Ice Cream Cone Technique as a Flapless Guided Bone Regenerative Method With Immediate Implant Placement in Management of Patients With Labial Plate Dehiscence: A Case Series

Immediate tooth replacement with immediate implants into fresh extraction sockets has become a common and promising clinical procedure in daily practice in regard of implant survival, osseointegration and esthetic outcomes . However, there are some challenges encountered in the treatment of patients with labial bone plate dehiscence. Deficiency of facial bone anatomy has a negative impact on esthetics and is a critical causative factor for esthetic implant complications and failures ..

Few studies investigated the reconstitution of labial bone plate dehiscence using ice cream cone technique and their results showed adequate bone regeneration 4 to 6 months where no labial plate was present prior to grafting technique. Ice cream cone technique as a flapless grafting technique in conjunction with immediate implant placement in patients with labial bone plate dehiscence requires further studies for its clinical relevance and approval.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Classical methods of guided bone regenerative methods succeeded to partially reconstitute the lost labial plate of bone using different grafting materials with barrier membranes.

This might be attributed to the necessity of using a full mucoperiosteal flap which interrupts the vascular supply to the bone and jeopardizing the process of total facial bone regenerative process. Therefore, Tan-Chu et al., (2014) described in a case report an innovative technique using resorbable collagen membrane in the shape of ice cream cone and allograft in the reconstitution of labial plate in patients with socket type II after extraction with folding the membrane to seal the socket and containing the blood clot to allow for occupation of osteogenic cell population without raising a flap. This technique showed an adequate bone regeneration with net result of 1.32 mm prior to no labial plate present before grafting. Hence, using immediate implant placement with the conjunction of the ice cream cone technique in regeneration of labial plate of bone needs to be further assessed to evaluate its clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Non-restorable teeth in maxillary inter-bicuspid region.
  2. All teeth have labial plate dehiscence (socket type II) after extraction.
  3. Patients free from any systemic conditions that may affect healing.
  4. Adequate bone volume for the placement of immediate implant.
  5. Presence of the adjacent teeth.
  6. Compliant patients.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Smokers.
  2. Pregnant females.
  3. Patients who were taking or currently taking any of the bisphosphonates.
  4. Any disease that might affect bone metabolism as osteoporosis.
  5. Insufficient inter-occlusal distance or mesio-distal space to place an implant supported restoration.
  6. The presence of any signs of acute infection in the surgical site or the adjacent natural teeth.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with non-restorable tooth in maxillary bi-cuspid region with labial/buccal plate dehiscence
Atraumatic extraction will be done The extraction socket will be debrided to remove any residual debris using surgical curettes Socket walls will be checked using a periodontal probe to ensure integrity of all sockets walls except the labial bone plate which must show a dehiscence. Implant placement will be done. All implants will engage at least 3 mm apical to the apical end of the socket with adequate primary stability Resorbable collagen membrane will be cut confirming to the size and shape of the defect of labial bone plate dehiscence. The membrane will be placed against internal surface of the extraction socket against the remaining buccal plate of bone. The gap between the collagen membrane and the implant fixture will be filled with xenograft particulates.The membrane will be folded in palatal direction to seal the socket in an ice cream cone shape, then will be secured using non-resorbable sutures

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in buccal/labial vertical bone dimensions
Time Frame: 6 months post operative
Vertical bone dimension will be measured at day 0 and 6 months post-operative
6 months post operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in labial/buccal plate thickness
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured at day 0 and 6 months post-operative using Cone beam tomography
6 months
Keratinized tissue width
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured using william's graduated probe
6 months
Gingival thickness
Time Frame: 6 months
Measured using william's graduated probe
6 months
Post operative pain measured with VAS scale
Time Frame: 1 week -2 weeks
VAS scale from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 with highest pain
1 week -2 weeks
Post-operative patient satisfaction with Yes or No question
Time Frame: 6 months
Yes or No question of overall patient satisfaction of the procedure
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 25, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MAmagad

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Study protocol, informed consent and clinical study report

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After completion of the study

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Clinicaltrials.gov

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant

Subscribe