- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04682977
Piloting the IPROACTIF Program to Preserve Functioning and Prevent Cognitive Decline
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60608
- University of Illinois at Chicago
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English speaking
- Community-dwelling
- 55 years of age
- Primary diagnosis of heart disease (coronary artery disease, ischemic heart disease, hypertensive heart disease), or uncontrolled diabetes (HBA1c greater than/equal to 10)
- Self-reported risk of functional decline (score of 3 or higher) on the 11-item Brief Risk Identification of Geriatric Health Tool or self-reported need for assistance with disease management
Exclusion Criteria
- Current/past diagnosis of stroke or other neurological disorders
- Receiving pharmacological treatment for cognition
- Participating in other exercise or ADL-focused intervention studies
- Non-English speaking
- Residing in a long-term care institution
- Compromised decision-making capacity (score >8 on SOMCT)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Usual care
Participants in the control group will receive usual services which might include primary care and prescription medications for chronic disease management.
|
Usual primary care services might include monitoring of vitals and other relevant laboratory testing, prescription of medications for chronic disease management, as well as counseling for lifestyle changes.
|
|
Experimental: IPROACTIF
10 weekly sessions.
First two sessions focus on comprehensive assessment of physical and executive functioning, assessment of home safety and accessibility, assessment of ADL/IADL competence and performance in context; information in these areas is used by the interventionist to collaboratively identify three patient-centered goals.
Goal planning is followed by 10 treatment sessions.
Treatment sessions focus on chronic disease education, problem solving issues related to disease management by modifying daily routines, recommendations for embedding physical activity in everyday tasks, and environmental modifications or activity adaptations to increase ADL/IADL independence.
|
IPROACTIF (Integrated PRimary Care and Occupational Therapy for Aging and Chronic Disease Treatment to preserve Independence and Functioning) is an intervention designed to be delivered in primary care settings by an on-site occupational therapist.
Based on the premise of preventing the physical and cognitive decline that is associated with aging and chronic disease, the 12-week intervention includes a comprehensive assessment of ADL functioning and ten intervention sessions addressing disease management, physical activity and executive functioning.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Functioning Measured Using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Validated self-reported assessment; respondent identifies up to 5 important activities they are experiencing difficulty with. Total score = sum of the activity scores/number of activities. scoring Scores can range from 0 to 10; higher scores indicate better physical functioning Minimal clinically important difference in previous studies = 1.2-2.2 points |
12 weeks
|
|
Physical Functioning Measured Using the PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 20
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The PROMIS Physical Function Short Form 20 (PF-20) is a measure of perceived ability to perform physical activities. Respondents rate 20 daily activities on a scale from 1 (unable to do) to 5 (no difficulty/limitation). Individual item scores are summed to compute the total raw score which is converted to a standardized T-score. T-scores range from 9.2 to 62.7. Higher T-scores indicate a better outcome. A score of 50 is the average for the United States general population with a standard deviation of 10. |
12 weeks
|
|
Physical Functioning Measured Using the Physical Performance Test (9-item)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
9-item performance-based assessment; scores can range from 0 to 36; higher scores indicate better physical functioning Minimal clinically important difference in previous studies = 2.4 points
|
12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Participation in Life Activities and Roles Using the Late Life Functioning and Disability Index (Disability Component) - Frequency Dimension
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
16-item self-reported measure; scaled scores for the frequency dimension range from 0-100; higher scores indicate greater frequency i.e. better performance.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Participation in Life Activities and Roles Using the Late Life Functioning and Disability Index (Disability Component) - Limitations Dimension
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
16-item self-reported measure; scaled scores for the frequency dimension range from 0-100; higher scores indicate lesser difficulty i.e. better performance.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Health Related Quality of Life Using the PROMIS Global Health Measure (Physical Subscale)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The PROMIS Global Health Short Form is a 10-item self-report assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Item scores are summed to compute raw scores for physical and mental health. Raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standard conversion table. T-scores for the physical health sub-scale range from 16.2 to 67.7. A T-Score of 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10 points. Higher T-scores indicate a better outcome. |
12 weeks
|
|
Health Related Quality of Life Using the PROMIS Global Health Measure (Mental Subscale)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The PROMIS Global Health Short Form is a 10-item self-report assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Item scores are summed to compute raw scores for physical and mental health. Raw scores are converted to T-scores using a standard conversion table. T-scores for the mental health sub-scale range from 21.2 to 67.6. A T-Score of 50 represents the average (mean) for the US general population with a standard deviation of 10 points. Higher T-scores indicate a better outcome. |
12 weeks
|
|
Self-efficacy Measured Using the Doing Chores Scale From the Self-Management Resource Center
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
This is a scale within the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales (CDSES) measure which assesses perceived confidence for performing specific behaviors for managing chronic health conditions and their sequelae.
This scale includes 3 items.
Items are rated on a scale of 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident).
The total scale score is the mean of the items and can range from 1 to 10. Higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Self-efficacy Measured Using the Manage Symptoms Scale From the Self-Management Resource Center
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
This is a scale within the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales (CDSES) measure which assesses perceived confidence for performing specific behaviors for managing chronic health conditions and their sequelae.
This scale includes 5 items.
Items are rated on a scale of 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (totally confident).
The total scale score is the mean of the items and can range from 1 to 10. Higher score indicates a better outcome.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Self-efficacy for Chronic Disease Management Using the Obtain Help From Community, Family, Friends Scale From the Self-Management Resource Center
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Change from pre-test (baseline) to post-test (12 weeks) in self-efficacy for getting support from others as measured on a 4-item validated self-reported assessment; Scores range from 1 to 10; higher scores indicate better self-efficacy
|
12 weeks
|
|
Self-efficacy for Chronic Disease Management Using the Manage Disease in General Scale From the Self-Management Resource Center
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Change from pre-test (baseline) to post-test (12 weeks) in self-efficacy for general disease management as measured on a 5-item validated self-reported assessment; Scores range from 1 to 10; higher scores indicate better self-efficacy
|
12 weeks
|
|
Self-efficacy for Chronic Disease Management Using the Social Recreational Activities Scale From the Self-Management Resource Center
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Change from pre-test (baseline) to post-test (12 weeks) in self-efficacy for engaging in social and recreational activities as measured on a 2-item validated self-reported assessment; Scores range from 1 to 10; higher scores indicate better self-efficacy
|
12 weeks
|
|
Self-efficacy for Chronic Disease Management Using the Exercise Regularly Scale From the Self-Management Resource Center
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Change from pre-test (baseline) to post-test (12 weeks) in self-efficacy for getting regular exercise as measured on a 3-item validated self-reported assessment; scores range from 1 to 10; higher scores indicate better self-efficacy
|
12 weeks
|
|
Performance of Daily Living Tasks Using the Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Change from pre-test (baseline) to post-test (12 weeks) as measured on the Performance Assessment of Self-care Skills (PASS).
The PASS is a performance-based assessment; individual is expected to perform an ADL/IADL task which is rated on independence, safety, and adequacy.
Independence scores range from 0-3; higher scores indicate better performance
|
12 weeks
|
|
Executive Functioning Using the Executive Function Performance Test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Change from pre-test (baseline) to post-test (12 weeks) as measured on the Executive Function Performance Test (EFPT).
The EFPT is a performance-based assessment; original assessment comprises three tasks; only the medication management task was used; scores range from 0-25 for this task; higher scores indicate poorer performance.
|
12 weeks
|
|
Executive Functioning Using the Dimensional Change Card Sort Test
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
The NIH Toolbox Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) Test is a computer-administered measure of cognitive flexibility and attention. Test takers match bivalent test pictures to the target pictures along dimensions of shape and color. Scoring is based on combining accuracy and reaction time & converted to a scale score with mean of 100 and SD of 15. Scale scores may be adjusted for age. Adjusted scores are relative to a normative sample with no universally applicable fixed minimum or maximum. Higher scores indicate better performance. Scores listed represent unadjusted scale scores. |
12 weeks
|
|
Physical Activity Level
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Change from pre-test (baseline) to post-test (12 weeks) in the average time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity as measured by an accelerometer worn for at least 6 hours for at least 4 days during a 7-day period.
|
12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mansha Mirza, PhD, OTR/L, University of Illinois at Chicago
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020-1461
- 5P30AG022849-17 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Disease (Coronary Artery Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease, Hypertensive Heart Disease)
-
Yonsei UniversityRecruitingCoronary Artery Disease, Ischemic Heart DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Aarhus University Hospital SkejbyInstitute for Clinical and Experimental MedicineCompletedHeart Failure | Coronary Heart Disease | Ischemic Heart DiseasesDenmark
-
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaActive, not recruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) | Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD)Italy
-
Fundación EPICCompletedIschemic Heart Disease | Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)Spain
-
Fundación EPICCompletedIschemic Heart Disease | Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)Spain
-
Fundación EPICCompletedIschemic Heart Disease | Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)Spain
-
GE HealthcareCompletedIschemic Heart Disease | Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)United States
-
Fundación EPICCompleted
-
Aarhus University Hospital SkejbyAbbottEnrolling by invitationIschemic Heart Disease | Ischemic Coronary Artery Disease | ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome)Denmark, Belgium, Germany, Finland, Sweden, Switzerland, Latvia, Norway, United Kingdom, Estonia, Netherlands, Italy
-
University of AlbertaActive, not recruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Stable Ischemic Heart Disease | Beta-blocker TherapyCanada
Clinical Trials on IPROACTIF (Integrated PRimary Care and Occupational Therapy for Aging and Chronic Disease Treatment to preserve Independence and Functioning)
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Kaiser PermanenteCompleted
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Lymphoma | Multiple Myeloma | Hematopoietic and Lymphoid System Neoplasm | Chronic LeukemiaUnited States