Demineralized Bone Matrix Rotator Cuff Study

July 30, 2021 updated by: Arthrex, Inc.
Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery will experience improved tendon healing with the use of demineralized bone matrix augmentation.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective randomized study comparing the outcomes of patient undergoing rotator cuff repair with either an interpositional procedure administering demineralized bone matrix (DBM), or a control group without demineralized bone matrix. Patient outcomes will be collected and compared between the two cohorts up to a five (5) year post-operative period and will include a range of subjective and functional outcomes, along with radiographic imaging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Medford, Oregon, United States, 97504
        • Southern Oregon Orthopedics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The Subject is between the ages of 40 and 75 years.
  • Subject is planning to undergo arthroscopic surgery for full thickness rotator cuff tears (RCT) of supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles, who are candidates for demineralized bone matrix with BMC.
  • Two tendon tear or tear size equal to or greater than 3cm
  • Amenable to double-row repair
  • Primary rotator cuff tears with or without superior labral tear and/or biceps tear)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The Subject is unable or unwilling to sign the Patient Informed Consent, approved by the Institutional Review Board.
  • The Subject objects to use of allograft
  • Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear
  • Complete full thickness subscapularis tears of > than the superior 1/3 of the tendon (Lafosse grade 3 and above)
  • < 2 mm joint space of the glenohumeral joint on either an anteroposterior or axillary radiograph
  • Recurrent shoulder instability
  • Intra-articular injections (steroids) within 1 month of surgery
  • RCR revisions
  • Subject MRI taken more than 12 months prior to surgery
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period
  • Workman's compensation case

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Interpositional Group
Demineralized bone matrix
Demineralized bone matrix
No Intervention: Control
Without demineralized bone matrix

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MRI
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Rate of healing of the rotator cuff repair
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES score)
Time Frame: pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year
Changes in patient self evaluation and physician assessment score
pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year
Veterans RAND Health (VR-12)
Time Frame: pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year
Changes in patient reported general health and mental survey. Average score is 50 (negative answers bring scores down, positive answers bring score up)
pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE)
Time Frame: pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year
Changes in patient reported affected shoulder survey base on percentage (0 - 100%, 100% being normal)
pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year
Changes in patient reported pain survey. 0 - 10 point scale (0 no pain, 10 worst possible pain)
pretreatment, 24 weeks, 1 year, 2 year and 5 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • US-1300

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Injuries

Clinical Trials on Demineralized bone matrix

3
Subscribe