Adaptation of a Rehabilitation Program for Prosody and Its Application on Egyptian Hearing Impaired Children

December 30, 2020 updated by: Sara Magdy Ibrahim

Prosody is the melody and rhythm of speech, it is used to refer to the supra segmental aspects of speech including pitch, loudness and duration. Variations in these features achieve different prosodic functions and are perceived by the listener as meaningful changes. The role of prosody in language acquisition and effective communication is documented in research. Nevertheless, prosodic intervention in children with hearing impairment received less attention compared to other speech and language areas.

The aim of this study is to adapt the "prosody treatment program", an evidence based rehabilitation program, and to detect the efficacy of its activities in improving the prosodic skills of Egyptian hearing impaired children.

The "prosody treatment program" is an evidence-based practice targeting receptive and expressive prosodic skills in addition to speech production, intelligibility, pragmatics and phonology. The program is applied using a systematic approach of providing cues following the principles adapted from dynamic temporal and tactile cueing (DTTC) for speech motor learning to help accelerate the child's learning of the prosodic skills targeted in this program. The program was translated to Arabic and adapted to be suitable for the Egyptian children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prosody has an important role in several areas of communicative functions including : grammatical, pragmatic, affective and/or indexical functions. Prosodic abnormalities extend across a wide range of communication disorders. Intact functioning auditory system has a fundamental role in language acquisition and development. Children receive the speech of others as a source of linguistic input which is considered their target and they gradually modify their productions using their own auditory feedback to reach the target utterance.

Hearing impairment early in life deprives the child of the source of their linguistic input affecting various aspects of speech and language development. Speech production of the hearing impaired is characterized by various segmental and suprasegmental errors.

Case studies show that interventions targeting prosody can modify prosody in young children with speech and language impairments. Multiple problems of prosody , language, speech and voice are found in individuals with prosodic impairments ,therefore it is challenging to develop treatment protocols addressing prosody .There are only few published interventions targeting prosody .

Due to lack of well structured comprehensive Arabic programs targeting prosody , this work was dedicated towards adaptation of "prosody treatment program" a remediation program targeting receptive and expressive prosodic skills and its application on hearing impaired children .The proposed program targets two levels: preschool and school aged children.

The aim of this work was to adapt the "prosody treatment program" program and apply its activities in cases of hearing impairment to detect its efficacy in improvement of prosodic skills in Egyptian hearing impaired children fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implant devices.

This study was conducted on 55 children with hearing impairment attending the Unit of Phoniatrics , in the outpatient clinic of Alexandria Main University hospital. Sample size was calculated using two proportions power analysis in NCSS and PASS program a minimum sample size required to detect the efficacy of the "prosody treatment program" in improvement of prosodic skills of Egyptian hearing impaired children and to detect a difference of 0.5 that achieve 80% power with a target significance level at 5%.

The proposed program is based on " prosody treatment program", a program targeting receptive and expressive prosodic skills. It includes activities targeting loudness , word stress ,syllable stress ,pitch ,question inflections ,emotions ,sarcasm ,rhythm ,chunking, and speaking rate . The program was adapted in order to be appropriate to the Arabic language and to the Egyptian children. The program was applied using a systematic approach of providing cues to help accelerate the child's learning of the prosodic skills targeted in the program. Cues are adapted from the Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC) for Speech Motor Learning hierarchy. It aims at improving motor planning, and programming speech processing as speech and language acquisition progresses.

The program is divided into two sections according to the age into preschool section and school age section.

A pilot study was conducted on 8 cases with hearing impairment attending the phoniatrics unit to check the suitability of the rehabilitation program and modify the needed items.

All subjects met the specified inclusion and exclusion criteria and were assessed by the specified protocol of assessment to evaluate prosodic skills, language skills and cognitive abilities before and after intervention.

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS software package version 20.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Qualitative data were described using number and percent. Chi square test was used for comparison of qualitative variables in two groups, Fisher exact test was used to compare qualitative variables when 50% of cell value was less than 5. McNemar test was used to compare nominal variables before and after intervention. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to verify the normality of distribution. Quantitative data were described using mean, standard deviation and IQR. Test of significance used included different tests. t test to compare between different means. Mann Whitney U test to compare non normally distributed quantitative variables in two different groups. Paired t test for comparison of normally distributed variables in matched pairs. Wilcoxon signed rank test for pre-post comparison in non-normally distributed quantitative variables. Kappa coefficient was used to assess level of agreement between two raters. Significance of the obtained results was judged at the 5% level.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

55

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 21131
        • Alexandria university, Faculty of medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hearing impaired children of both sexes, in the preschool age (from 3 to 6 years), and school age (6 to 18 years).
  • Children using auditory verbal communication.
  • Children with moderately severe or severe up to profound sensorineural hearing loss in unaided conditions, fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implant devices with good benefit (aided hearing threshold less than 40 dB across all frequencies).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with intellectual disability.
  • Children with brain damage.
  • Children with additional sensory deprivation (impaired vision).
  • Psychiatric problems (example; ASD).
  • Motor speech disorders (example: apraxia, dysarthria).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group IA
Preschool cases group who received the proposed "prosody treatment program" in addition to the traditional auditory and language rehabilitation therapy.

The "prosody treatment program" is an evidence-based practice targeting receptive and expressive prosodic skills in addition to speech production, intelligibility, pragmatics and phonology. The program incorporates the principles of validated prosodic rehabilitation strategies such as Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC), Melodic Intonation Therapy, Lee Silverman Voice Treatment in addition to expert professional practice.

The program was applied using a systematic approach of providing cues to help accelerate the child's learning of the prosodic skills targeted in the program. The program is divided into two sections according to the age into preschool section and school age section.

Auditory rehabilitation therapy included activities targeting auditory skills: sound detection, discrimination, identification and auditory comprehension. Language rehabilitation targeted improving semantics, syntax, pragmatics and phonology.
Active Comparator: group IB
preschool control group who received the traditional auditory and language rehabilitation therapy without the prosody rehabilitation program. This was considered the preschool age control group.
Auditory rehabilitation therapy included activities targeting auditory skills: sound detection, discrimination, identification and auditory comprehension. Language rehabilitation targeted improving semantics, syntax, pragmatics and phonology.
Experimental: group IIA
School age cases group who received the proposed "prosody treatment program" in addition to the traditional auditory and language rehabilitation therapy.

The "prosody treatment program" is an evidence-based practice targeting receptive and expressive prosodic skills in addition to speech production, intelligibility, pragmatics and phonology. The program incorporates the principles of validated prosodic rehabilitation strategies such as Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC), Melodic Intonation Therapy, Lee Silverman Voice Treatment in addition to expert professional practice.

The program was applied using a systematic approach of providing cues to help accelerate the child's learning of the prosodic skills targeted in the program. The program is divided into two sections according to the age into preschool section and school age section.

Auditory rehabilitation therapy included activities targeting auditory skills: sound detection, discrimination, identification and auditory comprehension. Language rehabilitation targeted improving semantics, syntax, pragmatics and phonology.
Active Comparator: group IIB
School age control group who received the traditional auditory and language rehabilitation therapy without the prosody rehabilitation program. This was considered the school age control group.
Auditory rehabilitation therapy included activities targeting auditory skills: sound detection, discrimination, identification and auditory comprehension. Language rehabilitation targeted improving semantics, syntax, pragmatics and phonology.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in prosodic skill assessment protocol subjective measures
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative test that evaluates ten prosodic skills, each skill is given a subjective score from 0 to 4 (4 is the best score) with a total score of 40.
baseline and 3 months
change in prosodic skill assessment protocol mean frequency measures
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative tool that evaluates mean frequency value of recorded utterances in hertz
baseline and 3 months
change in prosodic skill assessment protocol mean duration measures
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative tool that evaluates mean duration of recorded utterances in msec
baseline and 3 months
change in prosodic skill assessment protocol mean energy measures
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative tool that evaluates mean energy of recorded utterances in dB
baseline and 3 months
Change in Arabic prosodic assessment tool subjective ratings
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a qualitative tool that rates prosodic skills of recorded utterances as either (A) Appropriate or (I) Inappropriate
baseline and 3 months
Change in Arabic prosodic assessment tool frequency measures
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative tool that evaluates frequency values of recorded utterances in hertz
baseline and 3 months
Change in Arabic prosodic assessment tool duration measures
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative tool that evaluates duration of recorded utterances in msec
baseline and 3 months
Change in Arabic prosodic assessment tool energy measures
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative tool that evaluates energy of recorded utterances in dB
baseline and 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in Arabic language test scores
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative too that evaluates language skills, raw scores are converted into language age equivalent scores
baseline and 3 months
change in values of Stanford Binet scale
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months
a quantitative tool that evaluates intelligence quotient
baseline and 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ossama A Sobhy, PhD, Alexandria University
  • Study Chair: Rania M Abdou, PhD, Alexandria University
  • Study Director: Sara M Ibrahim, Master's, Alexandria University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 19, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Impaired Children

Clinical Trials on Prosody treatment program

Subscribe