Postoperative Recovery and Comfort in Patients Undergoing Urologic Robotic Surgery

April 5, 2022 updated by: Martin Holmberg, Linkoeping University

Postoperative Recovery and Comfort After Urologic Robotic Surgery: A Feasibility Study

Previously published studies show that adding intrathecal morphine to general anesthesia can reduce the postoperative pain and length of stay (LOS) in varies types of surgery. A recent meta-analysis showed that the addition of intrathecal morphine at doses below 500µg did not increase the risk of respiratory depression compared with a control group receiving intravenous opioids. Epidural analgesia is uncommonly used for robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures due to the limited surgical trauma. In addition, the risks associated with the epidural itself such as infection and spinal hematoma are thought to outweigh its possible benefits for these procedures.

At Linkoping University Hospital a combination of general anesthesia and intrathecal morphine in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and in robotic-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy is now routinely used in order to improve postoperative recovery. However whether this approach is beneficial in other types of robotic-assisted urological procedures is unknown.

Therefore the investigators aim to conduct a feasibility study for the use of intrathecal morphine combined with general anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective urologic laparoscopic robot-assisted surgery at Linkoping University Hospital. The investigators will include 30 patients in the study. The specific aims are to investigate the feasibility and sensitivity of Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR15), as an outcome tool measuring postoperative well-being in this patient cohort.

The investigators will also investigate the feasibility of other outcome measures such as postoperative pain, post-anesthesia care unit LOS, occurrence of pruritus and hospital LOS.

For planning of the timeframe of the future interventional study the investigators will use this feasibility study to examine the inclusion rate of study patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Linköping, Sweden
        • Linkoping University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult population undergoing elective urologic robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in Linkoping University Hospital, sweden.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for elective urologic robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in Linkoping University Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18
  • Not expected to comprehend the written or verbal study information
  • Patient planned for robotic assisted laparoscoic prostatectomy or robotic assisted laparoscopic cystectomy
  • Acute surgery
  • ASA class >3
  • Major surgery on another organ planned at the same operation
  • Patient planned for a neuraxial blockade in addition to general anaesthesia.
  • Study personal not available

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group feasibility
Adults undergoing elective urologic laparoscopic robotic surgery.
Intravenous morphine according to clinician´s discretion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15) score
Time Frame: Preoperative, postoperative up to day 7
Quality of Recovery 15. A total of 15 questions each answered with a value from 0 to 10. The minimum value of the QoR-15 is 0 and the maximum value is 150. A higher value means a better outcome.
Preoperative, postoperative up to day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
Up to 30 days
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: Up to postoperative day 3
Measurement of pain in rest and in movement with the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scale. Minimum value is 0 (no pain) and maximum value is 10 (extreme pain).
Up to postoperative day 3
PONV
Time Frame: Up to postoperative day 3
Measurement of the frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
Up to postoperative day 3
Return of bowel function
Time Frame: Up to postoperative day 7
Time to first passing of flatus and first passing of stool.
Up to postoperative day 7
Postoperative complications
Time Frame: Up to postoperative day 30
Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification
Up to postoperative day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Michelle Chew, MD PhD, Linköping University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 210101

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Usual care

Subscribe