- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04695249
Using 360° Videos in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders
Targeting Avoidant Behaviours in Anxiety Disorders Using Individualized 360° Videos: a Multiple Single Case Design
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There is growing evidence that supports the use of Virtual Reality (VR) to address anxiety disorders such as social anxiety and agoraphobia. The main advantage of VR is to expose participants to their fears in a controlled and safe environment. However, the access to VR remains costly for health professionals who need to pay licenses for the use of a limited number of environments. Therefore, these standardized environments only address the symptoms of standard anxious patients. As a way to provide an accessible tool that can be tailored according to patients' specific difficulties, the proposed approach builds on 360-degree videos as an alternative to VR.
The aim of the present study is to test the feasibility and efficacy of an individualized expo-sure intervention using 360-degree videos. In addition, the role of cognitive processes (i.e., dysfunctional beliefs and self-efficacy) in the exposure efficacy is examined. The intervention includes eleven sessions including five sessions of exposure in 360-degree videos de-signed especially for each patient difficulties.
A multiple single-case design (n=5) is adopted with three types of evaluations: (1) traditional assessment scale of primary/secondary outcomes and aspects related to the therapy, (2) daily ambulatory assessment with a multiple baseline design, (3) experience sampling of cognitive processes about feared situations.
Each video will also be assessed by the participants after exposure sessions.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Liège, Belgium, 4000
- University of Liège
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary diagnostic (DSM 5) of social anxiety or agoraphobia
- High level of avoidance
- French-speaking
- Having a mobile phone which met VR reading criteria
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having a history of psychotic or bipolar disorder
- Having a history of severe brain trauma or epilepsy
- Having a history of respiratory disturbances
- With a concurrent additional psychotherapy
- With acute suicidal ideation
- With a primary diagnosis of depression
- With a non stabilized medication
- Auto medication with alcohol or other substances
- Having migraine or motion sickness
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Exposure intervention
Eleven individual sessions.
|
The intervention consists of eleven sessions.
The first five sessions are dedicated to functional assessment and psychoeducation.
The second five sessions are dedicated to exposure in 360-degree videos.
The last session is provided for relapse prevention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 4 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Baseline : up to 4 weeks before intervention
|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 3 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Baseline : up to 3 weeks before intervention
|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 2 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Baseline : up to 2 weeks before intervention
|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Post intervention : last day of intervention, week 11
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Post intervention : last day of intervention, week 11
|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 week after intervention
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Post intervention : 1 week after intervention
|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Post intervention : 2 week after intervention
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Post intervention : 2 week after intervention
|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Follow up : Three months after intervention
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Follow up : Three months after intervention
|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months and 1 week after intervention
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Follow up : 3 months and 1 week after intervention
|
Social anxiety: avoidance
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months and 2 weeks after intervention
|
The French version of the LSAS-SR was used to assess the levels of anxiety and avoidance associated with social situations.
The LSAS-SR consists of 24 items describing four types of situations: (1) social interactions, (2) public speaking, (3) eating and drinking in public, (4) being observed.
Each item is rated on a 3-point scale according to both the level of fear (0 = "no fear" to 3 = "severe") and the level of avoidance (0 = "never" to 3 = "Usually").
A general total score can be obtained by summing all items and specific score of avoidance and fear as well as scores for specific type of situations can be obtained by summing specific items.
|
Follow up : 3 months and 2 weeks after intervention
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 4 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Baseline : up to 4 weeks before intervention
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 3 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Baseline : up to 3 weeks before intervention
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 2 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Baseline : up to 2 weeks before intervention
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Post intervention : last day of intervention, week 11
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Post intervention : last day of intervention, week 11
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 week after intervention
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Post intervention : 1 week after intervention
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Post intervention : 2 week after intervention
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Post intervention : 2 week after intervention
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months and 1 week after intervention
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Follow up : 3 months and 1 week after intervention
|
Social anxiety: severity
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months and 2 week after intervention
|
The French version of the SIAS was used to assess social anxiety severity.
The SIAS consists of 20 self-statements describing one's reaction to situations that involve social interaction.
Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all characteristic or true of me" to 4 "extremely characteristic or true of me".
The SIAS is scored by summing the ratings.
Total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores representing higher levels of social interaction anxiety.
|
Follow up : 3 months and 2 week after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 4 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Baseline : up to 4 weeks before intervention
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 3 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Baseline : up to 3 weeks before intervention
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 2 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Baseline : up to 2 weeks before intervention
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Post intervention : last day of intervention, week 11
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Post intervention : last day of intervention, week 11
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 week after intervention
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Post intervention : 1 week after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Post intervention : 2 week after intervention
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Post intervention : 2 week after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months and 1 week after intervention
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Follow up : 3 months and 1 week after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: avoidance
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months and 2 weeks after intervention
|
The French version of the MIA was used to assess the levels of agoraphobic avoidance.
The MIA consists of 25 items describing agoraphobic situations.
Each item is rated according to the level of avoidance on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = "never avoid" to 5 = "always avoid", both when the participants are accompanied or alone.
One final question concerns the number of panic attacks during the last week.
The MIA provides a score for situations alone or accompanied by summing the ratings.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance.
|
Follow up : 3 months and 2 weeks after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 4 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Baseline : up to 4 weeks before intervention
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 3 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Baseline : up to 3 weeks before intervention
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 2 weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Baseline : up to 2 weeks before intervention
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Post intervention : last day of intervention, week 11
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Post intervention : last day of intervention, week 11
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 week after intervention
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Post intervention : 1 week after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Post intervention : 2 week after intervention
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Post intervention : 2 week after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months and 1 week after intervention
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Follow up : 3 months and 1 week after intervention
|
Agoraphobia: Severity
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months and 2 weeks after intervention
|
The French version of the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale consists of 13 items divided in five subscales: (1) panic attacks, (2) agoraphobia, (3) anticipatory anxiety, (4) interference with family/hobbies/working and (5) worries about health.
Each item is rated on a specific 5-point scale, with higher scores indicating higher severity.
The PAS is scored by summing the subscales and all items with a total score ranging from 13 to 52.
|
Follow up : 3 months and 2 weeks after intervention
|
Multiple measures for change in levels of anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline : 1x/day (up to 3 week before the intervention)
|
A questionnaire comprising four questions regarding the daily rate of avoidant behaviours, approach behaviours, level of anxiety and the severity of anxiety consequences.
The questionnaire was sent every day to the participant via a mobile app.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance, approach, anxiety and severity of anxiety consequences.
|
Baseline : 1x/day (up to 3 week before the intervention)
|
Multiple measures for change in levels of anxiety
Time Frame: Intervention : 1x/day (11weeks)
|
A questionnaire comprising four questions regarding the daily rate of avoidant behaviours, approach behaviours, level of anxiety and the severity of anxiety consequences.
The questionnaire was sent every day to the participant via a mobile app.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance, approach, anxiety and severity of anxiety consequences.
|
Intervention : 1x/day (11weeks)
|
Multiple measures for change in levels of anxiety
Time Frame: Post-intervention : 1x/day (3 weeks)
|
A questionnaire comprising four questions regarding the daily rate of avoidant behaviours, approach behaviours, level of anxiety and the severity of anxiety consequences.
The questionnaire was sent every day to the participant via a mobile app.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of avoidance, approach, anxiety and severity of anxiety consequences.
|
Post-intervention : 1x/day (3 weeks)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Depression Anxiety and Stress
Time Frame: Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
The DASS consists of 21 items assessing (1) depression, (2) anxiety and (3) stress with self-statement.
With reference to the last week, all items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "Did not apply to me at all" to 3 "Applied to me very much or most of the time".
Scores for each subscale are obtained by summing the scores of relevant items.
Higher scores indicate higher level of depression, anxiety and stress.
|
Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
Depression Anxiety and Stress
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
The DASS consists of 21 items assessing (1) depression, (2) anxiety and (3) stress with self-statement.
With reference to the last week, all items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "Did not apply to me at all" to 3 "Applied to me very much or most of the time".
Scores for each subscale are obtained by summing the scores of relevant items.
Higher scores indicate higher level of depression, anxiety and stress.
|
Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
Depression Anxiety and Stress
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
The DASS consists of 21 items assessing (1) depression, (2) anxiety and (3) stress with self-statement.
With reference to the last week, all items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "Did not apply to me at all" to 3 "Applied to me very much or most of the time".
Scores for each subscale are obtained by summing the scores of relevant items.
Higher scores indicate higher level of depression, anxiety and stress.
|
Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
Self-efficacy toward managing the situation, the occurrence of the feared outcome and the fear itself
Time Frame: Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
A non-validated French version of the ACQ-R was used to assess the participants' perception of control over anxiety and anxiety-related situations (i.e.
similar to self-efficacy).
The ACQ-R is a 15-items scale assessing the perceived control of (1) emotion (5 items; e.g., "I am able to control my level of anxiety"), (2) threats (6 items; e.g., "There is little I can do to change frightening events") and (3) stress (4 items; e.g., "When I a put under stress, I am likely to lose control").
|
Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
Self-efficacy toward managing the situation, the occurrence of the feared outcome and the fear itself
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
A non-validated French version of the ACQ-R was used to assess the participants' perception of control over anxiety and anxiety-related situations (i.e.
similar to self-efficacy).
The ACQ-R is a 15-items scale assessing the perceived control of (1) emotion (5 items; e.g., "I am able to control my level of anxiety"), (2) threats (6 items; e.g., "There is little I can do to change frightening events") and (3) stress (4 items; e.g., "When I a put under stress, I am likely to lose control").
|
Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
Self-efficacy toward managing the situation, the occurrence of the feared outcome and the fear itself
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
A non-validated French version of the ACQ-R was used to assess the participants' perception of control over anxiety and anxiety-related situations (i.e.
similar to self-efficacy).
The ACQ-R is a 15-items scale assessing the perceived control of (1) emotion (5 items; e.g., "I am able to control my level of anxiety"), (2) threats (6 items; e.g., "There is little I can do to change frightening events") and (3) stress (4 items; e.g., "When I a put under stress, I am likely to lose control").
|
Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
Dysfunctional beliefs
Time Frame: Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
A non-validated French version of the AABS-2 was used to assess dysfunctional beliefs known to be aetiologically related to anxiety.
The AABS-2 consists of 33 beliefs concerning (1) Exposure to judgement, (2) Body vigilance, (3) Thought manifestations and (4) Anxiety.
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 100 with anchor points at 20, 40, 50, 60, 80%.
The four specific scores and one general score are obtained by adding the relevant items.
Higher scores indicate greater adherence in beliefs associated with anxiety.
|
Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
Dysfunctional beliefs
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
A non-validated French version of the AABS-2 was used to assess dysfunctional beliefs known to be aetiologically related to anxiety.
The AABS-2 consists of 33 beliefs concerning (1) Exposure to judgement, (2) Body vigilance, (3) Thought manifestations and (4) Anxiety.
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 100 with anchor points at 20, 40, 50, 60, 80%.
The four specific scores and one general score are obtained by adding the relevant items.
Higher scores indicate greater adherence in beliefs associated with anxiety.
|
Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
Dysfunctional beliefs
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
A non-validated French version of the AABS-2 was used to assess dysfunctional beliefs known to be aetiologically related to anxiety.
The AABS-2 consists of 33 beliefs concerning (1) Exposure to judgement, (2) Body vigilance, (3) Thought manifestations and (4) Anxiety.
Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 100 with anchor points at 20, 40, 50, 60, 80%.
The four specific scores and one general score are obtained by adding the relevant items.
Higher scores indicate greater adherence in beliefs associated with anxiety.
|
Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
Therapy outcome
Time Frame: Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the outcome Questionnaire was used to assess clinical changes in participants.
The MI-45 consists of 45 items that assess (1) intrapsychic symptoms of distress (i.e., 25 items, symptoms of depression and anxiety) (2) interpersonal relationship, (i.e., 11 items, satisfaction and difficulties during social interactions) and (3) social roles performance (i.e., 9 items, level of dissatisfaction, conflict, distress and incompetence related to employment, family and hobbies).
All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = Never to 4 = Almost Always.
The total score ranging from 0 to 80 and the three specific scores can be obtained by adding the relevant items.
In addition, the scale possesses a clinical threshold of 63 and a "reliable clinical change" starting from a 17-points gain or loss.
|
Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
Therapy outcome
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
The French version of the outcome Questionnaire was used to assess clinical changes in participants.
The MI-45 consists of 45 items that assess (1) intrapsychic symptoms of distress (i.e., 25 items, symptoms of depression and anxiety) (2) interpersonal relationship, (i.e., 11 items, satisfaction and difficulties during social interactions) and (3) social roles performance (i.e., 9 items, level of dissatisfaction, conflict, distress and incompetence related to employment, family and hobbies).
All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = Never to 4 = Almost Always.
The total score ranging from 0 to 80 and the three specific scores can be obtained by adding the relevant items.
In addition, the scale possesses a clinical threshold of 63 and a "reliable clinical change" starting from a 17-points gain or loss.
|
Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
Therapy outcome
Time Frame: Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
The French version of the outcome Questionnaire was used to assess clinical changes in participants.
The MI-45 consists of 45 items that assess (1) intrapsychic symptoms of distress (i.e., 25 items, symptoms of depression and anxiety) (2) interpersonal relationship, (i.e., 11 items, satisfaction and difficulties during social interactions) and (3) social roles performance (i.e., 9 items, level of dissatisfaction, conflict, distress and incompetence related to employment, family and hobbies).
All items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = Never to 4 = Almost Always.
The total score ranging from 0 to 80 and the three specific scores can be obtained by adding the relevant items.
In addition, the scale possesses a clinical threshold of 63 and a "reliable clinical change" starting from a 17-points gain or loss.
|
Follow up : 3 months after intervention
|
Multiple measures of transfer and control variables
Time Frame: Baseline : 1x/day (up to three weeks before intervention )
|
A questionnaire comprising 13 questions regarding the daily rate of positive and negative affects, the specific objective of the participant and control.
The questionnaire was sent every day to the participant via a mobile app.
|
Baseline : 1x/day (up to three weeks before intervention )
|
Multiple measures of transfer and control variables
Time Frame: Intervention : 1x/day (11weeks)
|
A questionnaire comprising 13 questions regarding the daily rate of positive and negative affects, the specific objective of the participant and control.
The questionnaire was sent every day to the participant via a mobile app.
|
Intervention : 1x/day (11weeks)
|
Multiple measures of transfer and control variables
Time Frame: Post-intervention : 1x/day (3 weeks)
|
A questionnaire comprising 13 questions regarding the daily rate of positive and negative affects, the specific objective of the participant and control.
The questionnaire was sent every day to the participant via a mobile app.
|
Post-intervention : 1x/day (3 weeks)
|
Experience sampling method
Time Frame: Baseline : up to 5x/day (up to 21 days)
|
Questionaire including 8 to 11 questions (3 conditioned) regarding the nature, response and appraisal of anxious situations.
Participants were asked to reply to the questionnaire on a mobile app when facing feared situations.
|
Baseline : up to 5x/day (up to 21 days)
|
Experience sampling method
Time Frame: Intervention : up to 5x/day (11 weeks)
|
Questionaire including 8 to 11 questions (3 conditioned) regarding the nature, response and appraisal of anxious situations.
Participants were asked to reply to the questionnaire on a mobile app when facing feared situations.
|
Intervention : up to 5x/day (11 weeks)
|
Experience sampling method
Time Frame: Post-intervention : spontaneous responses during 2 weeks after intervention
|
Questionaire including 8 to 11 questions (3 conditioned) regarding the nature, response and appraisal of anxious situations.
Participants were asked to reply to the questionnaire on a mobile app when facing feared situations.
|
Post-intervention : spontaneous responses during 2 weeks after intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Credibility and expectancy of treatment
Time Frame: Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
The French version of the Credibility and Expectancies Questionnaire (CEQ) was used at pre and post-assessment.
The CEQ consists of 6 items that assess (1) the therapy credibility (i.e., the extent to which the treatment makes sense, is believable, convincing and logical) and (2) expectancies towards the therapy (i.e., improvements expected through the intervention).
Higher scores indicate higher credibility and positive expectancies towards the treatment.
Higher scores indicate higher credibility and positive expectancies towards the treatment.
|
Baseline : up to three weeks before intervention
|
Credibility and expectancy of treatment
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
The French version of the Credibility and Expectancies Questionnaire (CEQ) was used at pre and post-assessment.
The CEQ consists of 6 items that assess (1) the therapy credibility (i.e., the extent to which the treatment makes sense, is believable, convincing and logical) and (2) expectancies towards the therapy (i.e., improvements expected through the intervention).
Higher scores indicate higher credibility and positive expectancies towards the treatment.
Higher scores indicate higher credibility and positive expectancies towards the treatment.
|
Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
Client Satisfaction towards the treatment
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) consists of 8-items that assess client satisfaction with treatment.
Higher scores indicate greater client satisfaction and therapeutic alliance.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of satisfaction towards the treatment.
|
Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
Helping Alliance
Time Frame: Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
The Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) consist of 8-items that assess the quality of the therapeutic alliance.
Higher scores indicate greater therapeutic alliance.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of therapeutic alliance.
|
Post intervention : 1 weeks after intervention
|
Therapy-related evaluation
Time Frame: Intervention phase : 1x/week (11 week)
|
A questionnaire including three questions about the therapeutic alliance, therapy credibility, and therapy satisfaction.
The participant received the questionnaire once a week on a mobile ap.
Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction, credibility and therapeutic alliance.
|
Intervention phase : 1x/week (11 week)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-360
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Social Anxiety Disorder
-
Aya Technologies LimitedCompletedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)United Kingdom
-
Tel Aviv UniversityCompletedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)Israel
-
University of BernUniversity of LuebeckActive, not recruitingSocial Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)Switzerland
-
Aya Technologies LimitedCompletedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia)United Kingdom
-
Daniel LiebermanTerminatedAnxiety | Anxiety Disorder SocialUnited States
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityBrain & Behavior Research FoundationTerminatedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder of ChildhoodUnited States
-
Tufts UniversityCompletedSocial Anxiety | Social Anxiety Disorder | Social Anxiety Disorder of ChildhoodUnited States
-
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.BehaVR LLCCompletedSocial Anxiety Disorder (SAD)United States
-
Emory UniversityBristol-Myers SquibbCompleted
-
Florida International UniversityYale UniversityRecruitingSocial Anxiety Disorder of ChildhoodUnited States
Clinical Trials on Exposure intervention using 360 degree videos
-
University of South FloridaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingArachnophobia | Cynophobia | OphidiophobiaUnited States