Vessel Deformations and Restenosis After Stenting of the Popliteal Artery (FIRESTEP)

Flexion-Induced Vessel Deformations and Restenosis After Stenting of the Popliteal Artery

The femoro-popliteal (FP) artery is the most frequently treated vascular segment in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD), for which endovascular therapy became an established treatment option during the last decades. However, loss of primary patency and consecutive clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) limit this procedure. Moreover, in the popliteal artery (PA), evidence about the best treatment strategy to prevent loss of patency and TLR is limited to only a few randomized controlled trials (RCT). Arterial deformations of the PA with its unique anatomical properties during leg flexion might explain the poor technical and clinical outcomes in this segment. Generally, a "leave nothing behind" strategy in the PA is preferred, but cannot be avoided in all cases due to e.g. flow limiting dissections or re-coil after balloon angioplasty. Basically two different self-expandable nitinol-based stent designs are available on the market. An interwoven nitinol and laser-cut nitinol stent. The interwoven nitinol stent has a higher radial force in comparison to the laser-cut stent and reveals higher patency rates in the FP arteries. However, a head-to-head comparison of these stents is missing and it remains unknown in which way different stent designs affect the deformation and hemodynamic behaviors of the PA during knee flexion.

Study Overview

• Status: Withdrawn
• Conditions: Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery Stenosis
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Interwoven stent; Device: Laser-cut stent

Detailed Description

Randomized trial to investigate the impact of different stent designs on the target lesion restenosis rate in femoro-popliteal arteries. Immediately after stent implantation, sets of three orthogonal angiographic views (separated by an angle of > 25°) of the stented region (TL) will be obtained with the leg in supine position. This will be followed by intra-arterial imaging using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). OCT images (one pullback if the lesion length is < 75 mm, 2 pullbacks otherwise) of the TL will be acquired using the Dragonfly catheter. In addition, duplex ultrasound (DU) of the TL will be performed, including the arterial segments 10cm at proximal and distal edge of the TL. Thereafter, a bending cast will be used to obtain a knee/hip flexion of approximately 70°/20°. In this position the angiographic, OCT, and DU measurements will be repeated.

The OCT images will provide the shapes of the arterial lumen which will be used to generate 3D surface models (in .stl format). The X-ray images will be utilized to construct the 3D arterial centerline for the supine and flexed leg positions. These arterial centerlines will be used to quantify the axial deformation (in mm), twisting (in °), and curvature changes (in mm-1) along the length of the investigated segment. Additionally, the lumen profiles obtained from OCT images will be used to accurately estimate the radial deformations (in mm) in the lumen and define instances of arterial pinching during leg flexion (as the difference in lumen diameters between straight and flexed leg positions).

The geometries of the arterial lumens will be combined with their corresponding 3D arterial centerlines to generate patient-specific arterial models. Along with patient-specific boundary conditions obtained from DU measurements, these models will be transferred to a commercial software, to perform Computational Fluid Dynamics analyses. The changes in these parameters due to leg flexion, as well as due to different stent designs, will be quantified.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 21 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Written informed consent prior to any study procedure,
• Presence of PAD (2 - 3 Rutherford-Becker class),
• Atherosclerotic de-novo lesion (stenosis >70% or occlusion) of the distal part of the superficial femoral artery and/or any part of the popliteal artery,
• Target lesion-length: 4cm to 12cm,
• Target vessel diameter: 5mm to 7mm,
• Guidewire must cross target lesion and located intraluminally before randomization,
• At least one (1) patent below-the knee artery (=with no stenosis >50%),
• Possibility to treat the target lesion with one (1) study stent
• Interventions in TASC A and B lesions to restore adequate blood flow, in the same index procedure, are allowed. This intervention must be prior to the treatment of the study lesion(s) and successful.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnancy,
• Angiographic evidence of thrombus within the target lesion,
• Patients with acute critical limb ischemia (Rutherford-Becker class 4-6),
• Restenosis of the target lesion,
• Non-atherosclerotic obstructions of the target lesion,
• Aneurysm of the target lesion,
• Renal failure, defined as GFR, <40 mL/min/1.73m2,
• Patient's inability to follow the study procedures e.g. psychological disorders, dementia, etc.,
• Previous enrolment into an ongoing study,
• Known or suspected allergies or contraindications to aspirin and/or clopidogrel, heparin,
• Coagulation disorders, or general refusal of the patient to receive blood transfusions,
• Contrast allergy that cannot be treated,
• Thrombolysis therapy including 72 hours before the planned index procedure,
• Myocardial infarction or stroke <30 days prior to index procedure.
• Equipment is unavailable to fulfill study treatments.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interwoven stent; Use of an interwoven nitinol stent to treat patients with arteriosclerotic lesions of the distal portion of the superficial artery and/or the popliteal artery.	Device: Interwoven stent; Interwoven nitinol stent placement in patients with arteriosclerotic lesions of the distal portion of the superficial artery and/or the popliteal artery.
Active Comparator: Laser-cut stent; Use of a laser-cut nitinol stent to treat patients with arteriosclerotic lesions of the distal portion of the superficial artery and/or the popliteal artery.	Device: Laser-cut stent; Laser-cut nitinol stent placement in patients with arteriosclerotic lesions of the distal portion of the superficial artery and/or the popliteal artery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Primary patency	Primary patency of the target lesion measured by duplex ultrasound	1 year post index procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Changes in arterial flow within the target lesion	Changes in blood flow/hemodynamics caused by the different stent designs measured by Computational Fluid Dynamics	6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Kantonsspital Aarau
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Aljoscha Rastan, Kantonsspital Aarau

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Estimated): December 1, 2023
• Primary Completion (Estimated): August 1, 2024
• Study Completion (Estimated): August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 4, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 6, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): January 7, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 12, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 7, 2024
• Last Verified: March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Arteriosclerosis; Arterial Occlusive Diseases; Atherosclerosis; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Peripheral Vascular Diseases
• Other Study ID Numbers: 1.0-2020

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: No