Development and Validation of the SWADOC Tool

February 21, 2024 updated by: Olivia Gosseries, University of Liege

The Development and Validation of the SWADOC Tool: A Study Protocol for a Multicentric Prospective Cohort Study

Background: After a period of coma, patients with severe brain injury may present disorders of consciousness (DOC). A wide proportion of these patients also suffer from severe dysphagia. Assessment and therapy of swallowing disabilities of DOC patients are essential because dysphagia has major functional consequences and comorbidities. Dysphagia evaluation in patients with DOC is hampered by the lack of adapted tools. The first aim of the study was to develop a new tool, the SWallowing Assessment in Disorders Of Consciousness (SWADOC), and propose a validation protocol. The SWADOC tool has been developed to help therapists to apprehend components related to swallowing in patients with DOC. The second aim is to appreciate the relationship between patients' level of consciousness and SWADOC items and scores.

Method/design: In this multicentric prospective cohort, 104 patients with DOC will be tested three times during two consecutive days with the SWADOC tool. Statistical analyses will focus on the reliability and validity of the SWADOC tool, especially the intra and inter-rater reliability, internal consistency, measures of dispersion and concurrent validity with the FOTT Swallowing Assessment of Saliva (FOTT-SAS). The level of consciousness will be assessed with the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)

Discussion: The assessment of swallowing abilities among patients with DOC is the first necessary step towards the development of an individualized dysphagia care plan. A validated scoring tool will be essential for clinicians to better apprehend dysphagia in DOC patients and to document the evolution of their disorders.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

104

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Brabant Wallon
      • Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Brabant Wallon, Belgium, 1340
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Neurologique William Lennox (UCL)
        • Contact:
      • Montpellier, France
      • Nîmes, France
      • Uzès, France

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will be carried out in patients with DOC or emerging from DOC following severe acquired brain injury. Patients will be divided into four groups according to their clinical diagnosis assessed with the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs): UWS, MCS-, MCS+ and EMCS. Participants will be recruited from inpatient neurological rehabilitation programs in post-coma units and rehabilitation services, or hospitalized for an evaluation of multimodal assessment of consciousness for diagnostic and prognostic purposes.

We will include 26 patients in each group, which will result in a total of 104 patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria :

  • Age above 18-year-old
  • Perfect knowledge of French language before the injury
  • Previous event of coma phase caused by a severe acquired brain injury
  • Medical stability (absence of mechanical ventilation and sedation, no acute medical pathology such as infection or respiratory distress)
  • No neurological or otorhinolaryngological disease which can impact swallowing prior to the brain injury
  • Minimum of 28 days since the acquired brain injury at inclusion
  • Diagnosis of UWS, MCS-, MCS+ or EMCS based on the CRS-R or SECONDs
  • Informed consent from legal representative of the patient
  • Affiliated patient or beneficiary of a health insurance plan (for French participants only).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome patients (UWS)
The level of consciousness will be assessed with the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorder (SECONDs) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

The tool explores some oral and pharyngeal components of swallowing as well as a range of prerequisite and related components of swallowing in DOC patients.

It is composed of an average of 50 qualitative items and a subsection named "SWADOC-scored" comprising 8 quantitative items.

Facial Oral Tract Therapy Swallowing Assessment of Saliva : the results of the SWADOC-scored in one of the sessions will be compared to the FOTT Swallowing Assessment of Saliva (FOTT-SAS) (27). The test is based on 7 questions under which if items 1-4 are answered "Yes" and items 5-7 are answered "No", oral intake should be initiated. The FOTT-SAS includes items that can be scored based on the administration of the SWADOC tool. In that respect, no additional administration will be required
Minimally conscious patients MINUS (MCS-)
The level of consciousness will be assessed with the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorder (SECONDs) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

The tool explores some oral and pharyngeal components of swallowing as well as a range of prerequisite and related components of swallowing in DOC patients.

It is composed of an average of 50 qualitative items and a subsection named "SWADOC-scored" comprising 8 quantitative items.

Facial Oral Tract Therapy Swallowing Assessment of Saliva : the results of the SWADOC-scored in one of the sessions will be compared to the FOTT Swallowing Assessment of Saliva (FOTT-SAS) (27). The test is based on 7 questions under which if items 1-4 are answered "Yes" and items 5-7 are answered "No", oral intake should be initiated. The FOTT-SAS includes items that can be scored based on the administration of the SWADOC tool. In that respect, no additional administration will be required
Minimally conscious patients PLUS
The level of consciousness will be assessed with the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorder (SECONDs) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

The tool explores some oral and pharyngeal components of swallowing as well as a range of prerequisite and related components of swallowing in DOC patients.

It is composed of an average of 50 qualitative items and a subsection named "SWADOC-scored" comprising 8 quantitative items.

Facial Oral Tract Therapy Swallowing Assessment of Saliva : the results of the SWADOC-scored in one of the sessions will be compared to the FOTT Swallowing Assessment of Saliva (FOTT-SAS) (27). The test is based on 7 questions under which if items 1-4 are answered "Yes" and items 5-7 are answered "No", oral intake should be initiated. The FOTT-SAS includes items that can be scored based on the administration of the SWADOC tool. In that respect, no additional administration will be required
Patients emerging from the minimally conscious state (EMCS)
The level of consciousness will be assessed with the Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorder (SECONDs) and the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).

The tool explores some oral and pharyngeal components of swallowing as well as a range of prerequisite and related components of swallowing in DOC patients.

It is composed of an average of 50 qualitative items and a subsection named "SWADOC-scored" comprising 8 quantitative items.

Facial Oral Tract Therapy Swallowing Assessment of Saliva : the results of the SWADOC-scored in one of the sessions will be compared to the FOTT Swallowing Assessment of Saliva (FOTT-SAS) (27). The test is based on 7 questions under which if items 1-4 are answered "Yes" and items 5-7 are answered "No", oral intake should be initiated. The FOTT-SAS includes items that can be scored based on the administration of the SWADOC tool. In that respect, no additional administration will be required

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the SWADOC-scored during three sessions (Examiner 1) - Intra-reliability
Time Frame: 15-25 minutes (3 times in 5 business days)

The SWallowing Assessment in Disorders Of Consciousness (SWADOC) tool is composed of an average of 50 qualitative and quantitative items. The subsection "SWADOC-scored" includes the 8 quantitative items. Four items are linked to the oral phase and four to the pharyngeal phase. For each quantitative item, patient's abilities are rated on a four-level severity scale ranging from 0 to 3. These levels correspond to item scores that can be added together to calculate 3 performance scores: the oral phase sub-score (sum of the 4 oral item scores - minimum of 0, maximum of 12), the pharyngeal phase sub-score (sum of the 4 pharyngeal item scores - minimum of 0, maximum of 12) and the total swallowing score (sum of the 8 item scores - minimum of 0, maximum of 24).

The better the score is, the better the swallowing is.

15-25 minutes (3 times in 5 business days)
SECONDs
Time Frame: 7 minutes (immediately before or after the SWADOC tool in each of the three sessions)
The Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs): it features a shorter administration time (median of 7 minutes) and required only a mirror as material. It consists of 8 items: observation and reporting spontaneous behaviors, response to command, communication, visual pursuit and fixation, pain localization, oriented behaviors and arousal. The SECONDs provides a total score directly reflecting one diagnosis (0 = coma, 1 = UWS, 2-5 = MCS-, 6-7 = MCS+, 8 = EMCS). The better the score is, the better the consciousness level is.
7 minutes (immediately before or after the SWADOC tool in each of the three sessions)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SWADOC-scored by Examiner 2 (inter-reliability)
Time Frame: 15-25 minutes - immediately before or after one of the three sessions
The SWallowing Assessment in Disorders Of Consciousness (SWADOC) tool is composed of an average of 50 qualitative and quantitative items. The subsection "SWADOC-scored" includes the 8 quantitative items. Four items are linked to the oral phase and four to the pharyngeal phase. For each quantitative item, patient's abilities are rated on a four-level severity scale ranging from 0 to 3. These levels correspond to item scores that can be added together to calculate 3 performance scores: the oral phase sub-score (sum of the 4 oral item scores - minimum of 0, maximum of 12), the pharyngeal phase sub-score (sum of the 4 pharyngeal item scores - minimum of 0, maximum of 12) and the total swallowing score (sum of the 8 item scores - minimum of 0, maximum of 24). The better the score is, the better the swallowing is.
15-25 minutes - immediately before or after one of the three sessions
FOTT-SAS (Examiner 1)
Time Frame: Immediately after one of the three sessions

FOTT-SAS (Facial Oral Tract Therapy Swallowing Assessment of Saliva) The FOTT-SAS is a reliable assessment for detecting aspiration risk in patients with acquired brain injury.

The test is based on 7 questions under which if items 1-4 are answered "Yes" and items 5-7 are answered "No", oral intake should be initiated (the better the score is, the better the swallowing is, minimum of 0, maximum of 7).

The observations made during the assessment will permit to score the FOTT-SAS and verify the concurrent validity of the SWADOC tool.

Immediately after one of the three sessions

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 24, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysphagia

Clinical Trials on SWADOC tool

3
Subscribe