Pilot Digital Follow-up of Lung Cancer

January 13, 2021 updated by: prof. dr. Wim Marneffe, Hasselt University

Pilot Study - Measurement of Cost, Outcome and Patient Experience of a Digital Weekly Follow up of Lung Cancer Patients

In the pilot study, 30 patients with metastatic lung cancer (stage IV) will be recruited at the start of their stage IV treatment from February 2019. The study period per patient will last six months, from the start of the stage IV treatment. Patients are eligible if they are diagnosed with stage IV lung cancer, speak sufficient Dutch, and are willing to participate. Patients are randomly assigned to two arms by simple randomization. In the intervention arm, 15 patients will receive a weekly questionnaire. Alerts will be sent to the multidisciplinary care team, who will undertake follow-up actions. In the control arm, 15 patients will receive the standard care pathway without weekly questionnaire and without automatic alerts to the care team. The standard care pathways and the care team are the same in both groups. In this pilot study, the weekly follow-up will be evaluated by a validation questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with patients (n=5) and the care team (n=5), and workload registration of the care team during a six-month period for all included patients in the pilot.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
        • AZ Delta

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • stage IV lung cancer,
  • speak sufficient Dutch
  • willing to participate

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control arm
Experimental: intervention arm
In the intervention arm, 15 patients will receive a weekly questionnaire. Alerts will be sent to the multidisciplinary care team, who will undertake follow-up actions. In the control arm, 15 patients will receive the standard care pathway without weekly questionnaire and without automatic alerts to the care team. The standard care pathways and the care team are the same in both groups. In this pilot study, the weekly follow-up will be evaluated by a validation questionnaire, semi-structured interviews with patients and the care team, and workload registration of the care team during a six-month period.
weekly digital follow-up by sending a questionnaire to patients and sending alerts based on the questionnaire to the care team

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the response rates on the digital weekly questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 26 weeks
In the weekly digital questionnaire the patient reports adverse events and psychosocial support needs. Based on this questionnaire alerts are generated to the care team
up to 26 weeks
Assess the Response on the validation questionnaire at Baseline and at Week 26
Time Frame: up to 26 weeks
In the validation questionnaire the patient evaluates the online system, the relevance and difficulty of the questions
up to 26 weeks
Assess the workload of responding to the alerts on the weekly questionnaire for the care team
Time Frame: up to 26 weeks
the workload is assessed by daily registration of the workload (in minutes) per patient during the six-month registration period by the care team: 2 MD pulmonologists, oncology nurse, psychologist, palliative support, and dietician
up to 26 weeks
Assess the clinical utility of the alerts for the care team
Time Frame: month 6
In semi-structured interviews with the multidisciplinary care team, the clinical utility of receiving and responding to alerts is assessed with every care giver: an MD pulmonologist, oncology nurse, psychologist, palliative support, and dietician
month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Validation questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline
Validation questionnaire
Time Frame: month 6
month 6
Weekly questionnaire based on PRO CTC-AE
Time Frame: up to 26 weeks
As individuals go through treatment for their cancer they sometimes experience different symptoms and side effects. For each question, please select the one response that best describes your experiences over the past 7 days…
up to 26 weeks
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Baseline
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
Baseline
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: week 6
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
week 6
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: week 12
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
week 12
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: week 18
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
week 18
EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: week 24
Questionnaire developed to assess the quality of life of cancer patients The EORTC QLQ-C30 comprises 30 items (i.e. single questions), 24 of which are aggregated into nine multi-item scales, that is, five functioning scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting) and one global health status scale. The remaining six single-item (dyspnoea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, diarrhoea and the financial impact) scales assess symptoms. No item occurs in more than one scale ( range in score from 0 to 100).
week 24
QLQ-LC13
Time Frame: baseline
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
baseline
QLQ-LC13
Time Frame: week 6
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
week 6
QLQ-LC13
Time Frame: week 12
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
week 12
QLQ-LC13
Time Frame: week 18
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
week 18
QLQ-LC13
Time Frame: week 24
The EORTC QLQ-LC13: a modular supplement to the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Scale 1-4 (1 Not at all - 4 very much).
week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wim Marneffe, prof. dr., Hasselt University
  • Study Chair: Veerle Ross, dr., Hasselt University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FU- Lung cancer - 001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on Weekly digital follow up

Subscribe