Implementation of Decade of Healthy Ageing Action Plan to Screen and Prevent Decline in Intrinsic Capacity in Elders (SPICE) Through Multisectoral Collaboration in Singapore (SPICE)

April 10, 2026 updated by: National University Hospital, Singapore
This study evaluates the implementation of a structured community-based pathway to screen, risk stratify, and prevent decline in intrinsic capacity (IC) among adults aged 60 years and above in Singapore. Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) framework and digital screening tools, participants will undergo IC domain screening in community settings. Individuals identified with early decline will receive targeted multidomain interventions and/or referral to primary or specialist care as indicated. Participants will be followed longitudinally to assess feasibility, uptake, functional trajectories, and implementation outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Population ageing is associated with progressive decline in intrinsic capacity (IC), defined by WHO as the composite of physical and mental capacities across mobility, cognition, vitality (nutrition), psychological, and sensory domains. Early detection of IC decline enables preventive, person-centred interventions to delay frailty, disability, and long-term care dependency.

The SPICE study operationalises the WHO ICOPE framework within Singapore's community ageing ecosystem through a coordinated hub-and-spoke model linking:Community screening platforms (e.g., Active Ageing Centres), Community Health Posts, Regional health system services and other social service organisations.

The pathway consists of:

Step 1: IC Screening

  • Screening using WHO ICOPE Monitor tools. Step 2: In-Depth Assessment
  • Participants screening positive for decline undergo structured assessment of affected domains.

Step 3: Risk Stratification & Care Planning

  • Traffic-light classification (low, moderate, high risk) with personalised care plans.

Step 4: Intervention & Referral

  • Multidomain community interventions (exercise, nutrition, cognitive stimulation, psychosocial engagement) or escalation to medical services when required.

Step 5: Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Longitudinal follow-up with repeat IC assessments at defined intervals. The study will evaluate implementation feasibility, prevalence of IC decline, adherence to care pathways, functional outcomes, and cost-effectiveness within a real-world community system.

In addition, blood and digital biomarkers will be collected from a subgroup of study participants.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Reshma Merchant (Associate Professor), MBChB (Edin)
  • Phone Number: +6567724368
  • Email: mdcram@nus.edu.sg

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore
        • Recruiting
        • National University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Reshma Merchant, MBChB
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Li Feng Tan, MBBS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Recruitment will be conducted from Active Ageing Centre and Community Centres.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • pre-frail or robust older adults who can provide consent and follow instructions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • frail or with terminal illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Screen and Prevent Intrinsic Capacity Decline in Elders (SPICE)
Community-dwelling adults robust or pre-frail aged 60 years and above who undergo WHO ICOPE-aligned digital intrinsic capacity screening, structured risk stratification, personalised multidomain community-based interventions, and longitudinal follow-up.

Participants will undergo baseline intrinsic capacity (IC) screening using WHO ICOPE-aligned tools in community settings. Follow-up contacts/visits will occur over the study period and include:

  1. Scheduled follow-up at predefined intervals (e.g., every 3, 6-12 months) for repeat IC assessment and outcome data collection; and
  2. Triggered (non-scheduled) follow-up that is initiated when remote/digital monitoring indicates decline in one or more IC domains, poor adherence, or when major intercurrent clinical events are reported/identified, prompting in-depth assessment, care plan adjustment, and referral to Community Health Posts, primary care, or specialist services as appropriate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of intrinsic capacity decline at baseline (robust / pre-frail)
Time Frame: Baseline
Proportion of participants (restricted to robust and pre-frail at baseline) with ≥1 impaired IC domain on screening; and proportion impaired by each domain (mobility, cognition, vitality, psychological, sensory).
Baseline
Uptake of recommended actions (implementation effectiveness)
Time Frame: Up to 3 months post-recommendation
Proportion of participants who initiate at least one recommended action within a defined window after screening/plan (e.g., enrolment in a prescribed community programme, completion of recommended assessment, or attendance at a referred service).
Up to 3 months post-recommendation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Identification of (a set of) biomarkers of aging
Time Frame: 30 months
Both blood biomarkers and digital markers associated with various intrinsic capacity
30 months
Feasibility and reach
Time Frame: 30 months
Proportion of individuals in each community setting complete both Step 1 and Step 2 assessment.
30 months
Change in intrinsic capacity and function over time
Time Frame: 12 months from enrolment
Change in number of impaired IC domains (0-5) from baseline to follow-up.
12 months from enrolment
Frailty progression
Time Frame: over 12 months follow up
Proportion transitioning from robust → pre-frail/frail; pre-frail → frail
over 12 months follow up
Cost per participant screened
Time Frame: 3 years
Programme delivery cost from the provider/programme perspective, calculated as total programme delivery cost divided by the number of participants screened; costs include personnel, training, digital platform/monitoring, screening and assessment delivery, and intervention coordination.
3 years
Number of participants with at least one unscheduled emergency department visit or hospital admission
Time Frame: 12 months
Number and proportion of participants with at least one unscheduled emergency department visit or unplanned hospital admission during follow-up, based on participant report and/or clinical records where available.
12 months
Implementation outcomes assessed using RE-AIM framework
Time Frame: 3 years

Reach: Proportion of eligible older adults screened, characteristics of participants.

Effectiveness: Proportion of participants with identified IC impairment who receive recommended follow-up actions, including referral to community services, primary care, or multidisciplinary assessment.

Adoption: Provider-reported acceptability and perceived usefulness of the screening pathway (measured using an adapted 8-item questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA)).

Implementation: Adherence to screening protocols among providers, completion of Step 1 and Step 2 assessments, and referral processes. Implementation strategies, barriers, and facilitators will also be documented by qualitative method.

Maintenance: Continued delivery of IC screening at participating sites, and Integration of the programme into routine community health services. The 23-item Normalization Measure Development questionnaire (NoMAD) and the 12-item SCIROCCO tool will be used.

3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NICTran2023-0013 (Other Grant/Funding Number: National Medical Research Council)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

It will not be individual level data but rather a group data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Subscribe