PD-Ballet: Effectiveness and Implementation in Parkinson's Disease

April 19, 2021 updated by: King's College Hospital NHS Trust

Efficacy of Ballet Dancing on Motor and Non-motor Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease: a Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-implementation Trial

Current literature consistently demonstrates beneficial motor effects of dance-based therapies in Parkinson's disease, along with improved quality of life. Little is known about the non-motor gains following such therapy. To date, no RTC has been conducted to investigate the benefits of ballet dancing in Parkinson's disease.

The investigators aim to recruit 160 people with Parkinson's to either: participate in a 12-week ballet-based dancing intervention followed by a 'social Tea and Biscuit' session, or 12-week usual treatment monitoring and 'social Tea and Biscuit' sessions taking place after each intervention session. This study employs a randomised, controlled, single-blind, hybrid type 2 design with a hybrid implementation protocol to investigate both clinical efficacy of the programme and implementation aspects. The project's primary outcome measure is centered around non-motor symptoms of PD. Other measures include motor assessments, wearable sensors and quality of life assessments.

Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the delivery of the sessions will be a hybrid model - virtual sessions will be the primary method, with some capacity for in-person delivery when possible and deemed safe.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Parkinson's Disease is a neurodegenerative condition currently affecting over 120,000 people in the UK and this number is set to double by 2065. The current treatment is based around symptomatic pharmacotherapy with levodopa being the gold standard. Currently there is some evidence for non-pharmacological treatments outlined by NICE guidelines, with no recommendations to specific adjuvant non-pharmacotherapies to aid PD symptoms, other than referral for physiotherapy. However, physical exercise has been shown to improve balance, strength, coordination and gait, leading to a significant improvement in quality of life.

While a clear benefit of physical exercise on the motor symptoms is evident, few studies to date focused on the effects of group classes and on non-motor effects. Dance is emerging as a therapeutic option with cognitive, functional and psychosocial benefits, due to it being a multi-dimensional activity offering auditory, visual and sensory stimulation, musical experience, social interaction, memory, motor learning and emotional perception, expression and interaction and as such stimulating multiple pathways. To date, no research has explored acute and chronic effects of exercise based interventions (such as dance therapy with ballet) in comparison to the conventional therapy-based management of Parkinson's.

This is a randomised, controlled, single-blind study involving 160 PwP across all stages of the disease. Participants will be allocated to either standard therapy plus 12 weekly sessions of ballet-based dancing followed by 'Tea and Biscuit' session or standard therapy with 'Tea and Biscuit' session on a 2:1 ratio. Non-motor symptoms, motor symptoms and quality of life will be measured using validated scales, questionnaires and wearable sensor recordings (Parkinson's KinetiGraph, GaitSmart). Furthermore, electrophysiological measures will be performed to determine the effects on cortical activity in a subgroup of participants. Assessments will be performed by a blinded rater at baseline and at the end of the intervention. The project will also explore the possibility of implementation of such therapy into the current pathways.

Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the delivery of the sessions will be a hybrid model - virtual sessions will be the primary method, with some capacity for in-person delivery when possible and deemed safe.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Effectiveness investigation eligibility criteria (PwPs only)

  1. Inclusion:

    • Age of 18 and upwards
    • diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) according to the UK PD Brain Bank criteria
    • Hoehn Yarhr stages I-V
  2. Exclusion:

    • diagnosis or suspicion of other causes for parkinsonism
    • advanced-stage therapy consideration (deep brain stimulation, continuous levodopa duodenal infusion, and continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion)
    • any condition interfering with the ability to give the informed consent
    • Indication of dementia through a score of ≤21 on MoCA
    • enrolment in a simultaneous investigational trial
    • inability to travel to the weekly sessions

Implementation science investigation eligibility criteria f) Inclusion:

  • People with Parkinson's - patients with a formal diagnosis of PD who have participated in the PD-Ballet intervention.
  • Family members of PwP - relatives/carers/nominated person of the patients with a formal diagnosis of PD who have participated in the PD-Ballet intervention
  • Clinicians (Referrers) - neurologists/geriatricians/neuropsychiatrists/SALT/OT, as well as PD specialist nurses, physicians and research staff experienced in PD
  • Dance leaders (Deliverers) - English National Ballet dancers involved in the PD-Ballet project
  • Support staff (Supporters)- other parties involved with the PD-Ballet project

    g) Exclusion:

  • People with Parkinson's - parkinsonism other than PD, lack of involvement in the PD-Ballet project
  • Clinicians - Neurologists/geriatricians/neuropsychiatrists/SALT/OT, as well as PD specialist nurses, physicians and research staff experienced in PD
  • Dance leaders - English National Ballet dancers not involved in the PD-Ballet project
  • Support staff - other parties not involved with the PD-Ballet project

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
Ballet-based dance sessions will be delivered by trained artists within the English National Ballet group in a professional dance space/ delivered remotely, COVID-19 permitting.
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual Treatment
usual treatment with the addition of joining 'Tea and Biscuit' sessions remotely

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total score of the Movement Disorders Society Sponsored Non-Motor Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness Primary Outcome Measure, higher score indicate worse non-motor symptomatology, the maximum score is 1008.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Acceptability of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: post intervention (week 12)
Implementation Effectiveness Primary Outcome Measure - a 4 item, 5-point likert scale
post intervention (week 12)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in total score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse motor condition
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of 10-meter walk test
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. Time taken to walk 10 meters is calculated and compared at specific timepoints.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of King's Parkinson's Pain Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse levels of pain
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. Time taken to carry out the test measured. A change between timepoints will be measured.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Montreal Cognitive Assessment
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. Maximum score 30. Lower scores indicate cognitive impairment.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Impression of Severity Index for Parkinson's disease
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
provides a clinical judgment on Parkinson's disease (PD) severity based on motor symptoms and complications, cognitive status, and disability
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale 2
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse sleep quality
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates worse quality of life.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score and sub-scores of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse anxiety and depression.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Schwab and England Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates higher level of independence in performing activities of daily living.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. A lower score indicates better quality of life
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Parkinson's Fatigue Scale-16
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more fatigue.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more activity
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Starkstein Apathy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates more apathy.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Wearing Off Questionnaire-9
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. Higher score indicates worse wearing-off.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in total score of Zaritt Burden Interview
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness. A higher score indicates more carer burden.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Electrodiagnostic Measures - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation paired with Electroencephalography and electromyography.
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness - exploratory measure. EMG data are analysed via Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design). Peak-to-peak MEP amplitudes are measured for each trial and averaged per condition. SICI is calculated as the ratio of mean conditioned MEP to mean unconditioned MEP. TMS-evoked EEG potentials will be calculated by averaging artifact-free EEG trials for each experimental condition (i.e., before and after intervention). To smooth the signal a low-pass filter of 45 Hz will be applied to TEPs. The aim is to evaluate drug-induced changes for the 5 typical TEPs components (P = Positive, N = Negative) in accordance with the literature: N15-P25, N45, P70, N100, and P180.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Change in the scores of Parkinson's KinetiGraph parameters (bradykinesia, dyskinesia, tremor, immobility)
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Clinical Effectiveness, objective artigraphy based wearable sensor worn at home for 6 days at each time point.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Implementation Effectiveness - a 4-item, 5-point likert scale
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Implementation Effectiveness - a 4-item, 5-point likert scale
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Sustainability scale (NOMAD)
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Implementation Effectiveness - a 19 item implementation science survey (Finch et al., 2015)
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Implementation costs
Time Frame: Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability
Health Economics - questionnaire regarding the potentially incurred costs related to clinical care for a person with Parkinson. The investigators will measure the potential change in direct and indirect costs incurred from clinical care.
Baseline (week -4 to 0), end of intervention (week 12-14) and up to 24 weeks post intervention depending on participant availability

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

April 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 19, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Dance with ballet elements

Subscribe