Detectability of the Bladder With an Early Prototype of the Bladder Sensor

November 23, 2021 updated by: Essity Hygiene and Health AB

An Explorative, Monocentric, Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Detectability of the Bladder in Healthy Subjects by Ultrasound Monitoring With the Early TENA Bladder Sensor Prototype

This is an explorative, monocentric, feasibility study to evaluate the detectability of the bladder in healthy subjects by ultrasound monitoring with the early prototype of a future bladder sensor, which is intended for use for an individual suffering from urinary incontinence.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this clinical investigation with healthy subjects (defined as subjects without urological problems or lower urinary tract symptoms, assured by pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria) is to collect raw measurement data of the urinary bladder region of volunteers with the TENA-PROTO1, in multiple postural positions to evaluate the detectability of the bladder in the intended users and to determine the position criteria for the (future) ultrasound sensor on the lower abdomen. Secondarily, this clinical investigation aims to collect data on the adhesive and supportive belt used to fix the transducer assembly to the lower abdomen by the subject. Furthermore, safety of the subjects will be continously documented such as adverse events (AE) and device deficiencies (DD); AEs, Adverse Device Events (ADE), Severe Adverse Events (SAE), Severe Adverse Device effects (SADE), Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects (USADE) and DDs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

91

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6534AT
        • Novioscan - an Essity company

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years to 74 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men, women and diverse ≥ 35 and <75 years old
  • Capability to understand the subject information and to provide conscious informed consent
  • Signed informed consent for study participation and data protection regulations
  • All subjects with childbearing potential must either be surgically sterile (hysterectomy or tubal ligation) or agree to use a reliable method of contraception with a failure rate of a Pearl-Index less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intra uterine devices, sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner for at least 4 weeks
  • Willingness to conduct a urine pregnancy test for all subjects with childbearing potential
  • BMI ≥18.5 kg/m² and <40 kg/m²
  • Capability and willingness to follow the following requirements: protocol, current hygiene concept and laboratory safety

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with urological problems or lower urinary tract symptoms
  • Subjects with breached skin, open wounds, sutures or major scar tissue in the suprapubic region.
  • Subjects with active implants that can be affected by electromagnetic interference (e.g. pacemaker)
  • Subjects with symptoms of constipation or diarrhea
  • Subjects who are pregnant or breast feeding
  • Known allergies or intolerances to one or several components of the study product
  • Alcohol abuse as reported by subject and/ or suspected by investigator that impacts capability to understand the subject information and to provide conscious informed consent in the discretion of the investigator / study personnel
  • Drug abuse as reported by subject and/ or suspected by investigator that impacts capability to understand the subject information and to provide conscious informed consent in the discretion of the investigator / study personnel
  • Objections of the investigator to the subject's participation in the trial due to medical reasons or any other reason for which the subject should not participate in the opinion of the investigator
  • Participation in any clinical investigation with systemic and/or pharmaceutical substances within the last 4 weeks and/or in parallel
  • Sponsors, manufacturers or CRO staff

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: TENA-PROTO1
Investigational device. Early prototype
Each volunteer will test the TENA-PROTO1 according to a standardized protocol in multiple postural positions to evaluate the detectability of the bladder by help of the investigational device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bladder detectability rate as a function of gender, BMI, age, sensor position, posture and combinations of these variables
Time Frame: 4 months
Percentage of those, where the bladder was detected in total or regarding different subgroups (BMI, age, sex, postural positions and sensor location ) based on raw measurement data of the urinary bladder region of volunteers with the early prototype of the Bladder Sensor in multiple postural positions to evaluate the detectability of the bladder in the intended users
4 months
Raw measurement data for the development of an algorithm to determine the bladder filling status
Time Frame: 4 months
Raw data, that has been assessed by the prototype (TENA-PROTO1) will be used to develop a product specfic algorithm (R&D outcome)
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Any adverse event (AE) or device deficiency (DD)
Time Frame: Ongoing documentation after enrolment until end of the measurement day (4 months)
Documentation of AEs, Adverse Device Events (ADE), Severe Adverse Events (SAE), Severe Adverse Device effects (SADE), Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects (USADE) and DDs.
Ongoing documentation after enrolment until end of the measurement day (4 months)
Evaluation of the fixation methods and device regarding user needs by the subjects on a score
Time Frame: 4 months
Descriptive analyses of scores assessed by a questionnaire completed by subjects regarding the adhesive and supportive belt used to fix the transducer assembly to the lower abdomen by the subject during and at the end of the measurements
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pieter Dik, Prof., Department of Pediatric Urology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital UMC Utrecht, P.O. Box 85090, 3508, AB, the Netherlands

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 29, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 19, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ELECTRO
  • P2101 (METC Number)
  • NL76062.028.20 (OTHER: Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on TENA-PROTO1

Subscribe