Erector Spinae Block vs Morphine in Vertebral Fixation (ATLANTE)

March 6, 2023 updated by: AUSL Romagna Rimini

Erector Spinae Plane Block Efficacy Versus Intravenous Morphine for Postoperative Pain Control Following Vertebral Fixation Surgery Via Posterior Approach: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The study aims to shed light about the potential role of Erector Spinae Block in the management of postoperative pain following vertebral fixation surgery via posterior approach. Patients will be randomized, the block will be performed before inducing general anesthesia, intraoperative management will be uniformed, while postoperative analgesia will compare cases (patients who received the block) versus controls (usual care with endovenous morphine infusion only).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a single-centre, interventional, prospective, case-control study. After being informed about the study and potential risks during preoperative anaesthetic evaluation, all patients giving written informed consent will be enrolled in the study.

Inclusion criteria will be: patients undergoing vertebral fixation via posterior approach both for degenerative or traumatic causes, age 18-85, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III, written informed consent signed. Exclusion criteria will be: patients outside the 18-85 year old range, allergies or contraindications to the use of local anaesthetics and erector spinae block, skin infections at the puncture site, body-mass index above 40.

The initial estimate of patients needed to detect statistically significant results has been estimated in 30 (15 cases versus 15 controls). Considering the surgical activity in the organising centre, the study should be completed before the end of 2021. Randomization will be made with a random sequence informatically produced. The study will be double-blinded, with the patient, the nurse doing the postoperative pain assessment and the statisticians not knowing the type of anaesthesia performed (only the anesthesist in the operating theatre is unblinded).

Erector spine plane (ESP) block will be performed after general anaesthesia (GA) induction, with the patient already in prone position. It will be made at the vertebral level of surgical fixation, bilaterally, with Ropivacaine 0.4% and dexamethasone 4 mg in 20 mL of sodium chloride (NaCl) 0.9% per side. GA will be induced with propofol, fentanyl and rocuronium to all patients, while GA maintenance will be performed with total-intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and boluses of fentanyl as required. Basic blood pressure, pulse-oximetry, electrocardiogram, train-of-four, body temperature and bispectral index monitoring will be applied to every patient. At the end of the surgery all the patients will receive a bolus of acetaminophen 1 g and morphine 4 mg.

Post-operative analgesia in controls will be performed by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps infusing boluses-at-request of morphine 1 mg (maximum once every 15 minutes) with no background infusion, plus acetaminophen 1 g every 8 hours for the first 48 hours.

Post-operative analgesia in cases will be performed with PCA only releasing boluses-at-request (maximum 1 mg every 15 minutes) and acetaminophen 1 g every 8 hours during the first 48 hours.

Postoperative pain will be assessed by a trained physician blinded to the anaesthetic technique employed. Numerical rating scale (NRS) and Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) will be performed at 2-6-12-24-36-48 hours after the end of the surgery.

The primary outcome is postoperative morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes are intraoperative opioid use, postoperative NRS scores, in-hospital length-of-stay and final patient satisfaction.

Statistical analysis will be performed by trained professionals with STATA 14.2 for Windows.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Emilia Romagna
      • Cesena, Emilia Romagna, Italy, 47521
        • AUSL Romagna M. Bufalini Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-II-III
  • written informed consent signed
  • traumatic or degenerative disease
  • adult age (18-65 year old)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • allergies to local anesthetics
  • contraindications to ESP block execution
  • congenital or drug-induced coagulopathies
  • infections at the puncture site
  • BMI > 40

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Erector spinae plane block + patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine

Preoperative bilateral ESP block with ropivacaine 0,4% + dexamethasone 4 mg, 20 mL per side, at the median spinal level of intervention.

End-surgery: acetaminophen 1 g ev + 4 mg morphine ev before the end of the intervention.

PCA: morphine 1 mg, max every 30 minutes. Rescue: ketoprofen 100 mg ev, max three times per day.

Ultrasound-guided interfascial technique, aiming to block the anterior and posterior branches of the spinal nerves for multi-dermatomal analgesia. Injection of local anesthetic in the plane deep to the erector spinae muscles and superficial to the transverse processes, to achieve a craniocaudal distribution along several vertebral levels.
Other Names:
  • ATLANTE
Patient-controlled intermittent boluses of morphine 1 mg (maximum once every 15 minutes).
Other Names:
  • ATLANTE
Active Comparator: Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous morphine

End-surgery: acetaminophen 1 g ev + 4 mg morphine ev before the end of the intervention.

PCA: morphine 1 mg, max every 30 minutes. Rescue: ketoprofen 100 mg ev, max three times per day.

Patient-controlled intermittent boluses of morphine 1 mg (maximum once every 15 minutes).
Other Names:
  • ATLANTE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative morphine consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours
Milligrams of morphine used to control postoperative pain
48 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative opioid use
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Micrograms of fentanyl used to control intraoperative pain
Intraoperative
Postoperative pain control
Time Frame: 2-6-12-24-36-48 postoperative hours
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 0= better outcome; 10=worse outcome
2-6-12-24-36-48 postoperative hours
Postoperative agitation-sedation-delirium
Time Frame: 2-6-12-24-36-48 postoperative hours
Richmond agitation-sedation scale RASS -5 Cannot be arouse; 4 Combative
2-6-12-24-36-48 postoperative hours
In-hospital length-of-stay
Time Frame: 2-6-12-24-36-48 postoperative hours
Number of days
2-6-12-24-36-48 postoperative hours
Patients satisfaction
Time Frame: at 48 postoperative hours
1 (bad) to 10 (good) scale vote
at 48 postoperative hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Domenico P Santonastaso, MD, AUSL Romagna - Ospedale Bufalini di Cesena

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

5 years, after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Corresponding author email, upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spondylolisthesis

Clinical Trials on Erector Spinae plane Block

Subscribe