Efficacy and Safety Study of AI201901 in Allergic Rhinitis Patients (HILARIA)

September 6, 2023 updated by: Abdi Ibrahim Ilac San. ve Tic A.S.

Randomized Multicenter Phase III Efficacy and Safety Study of AI201901 in Allergic Rhinitis Patients (HILARIA)

This is a prospective, national, randomized, multicenter, parallel group, Phase III study that evaluates the effects of AI201901 in Allergic Rhinitis patients, where they will spray twice a day against azelastine into both nostrils during a 28-day follow-up period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

210

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Izmir, Turkey
        • Dokuz Eylul University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be diagnosed as allergic rhinitis on the basis of medical history, physical examination, and skin prick test, and according to ARIA 2008 criteria
  • To be included in seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis group
  • To have a related complaint for at least 2 years
  • To be informed about the study and to give consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of superficial nasal mucosal erosion, moderate nasal mucosal erosion, nasal mucosal ulceration and nasal septum perforation during nasal examination
  • Presence of nasal diseases that are likely to affect the accumulation of intranasal drugs, such as acute or chronic sinusitis, rhinitis medicamentosa, clinically significant polyposis or clinically significant nasal structural abnormalities
  • Having undergone a nasal or sinus surgery for up to one year before the study
  • The use of systemic or topical steroids within the last 15 days prior to inclusion in the study
  • The use of antihistamine, chromoline Na within the last 15 days prior to inclusion in the study
  • The use of any investigational drug within 30 days prior to Visit 1;
  • Known hypersensitivity to components of the products used in the study
  • Presence of respiratory infections, which have developed within the two weeks prior to Visit 1
  • Diagnosis of COPD
  • A history of alcohol or drug addiction treatment within the last 2 years prior to inclusion in the study, or any current addiction on alcohol or drugs,
  • Use of alcohol and other drugs (antidepressants) that have a negative effect on reaction time / concurrent use of sedative drugs or other drugs that act on the central nervous system
  • Presence of significant lung diseases including asthma. ((Only patients with intermittent asthma who need short-acting inhaled bronchodilators (no more than twice a week) and do not wake up at night due to asthma are suitable for inclusion)).
  • Presence of chronic obstructive sleep-apnea syndrome (clinical diagnosis)
  • Presence of any surgical or medical condition, which, according to the opinion of the responsible researcher, could significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of the investigational product, or could significantly affect the patient's ability to complete this study
  • Presence of symptoms in the medical history in relation to glaucoma, cataract, ocular herpes simplex, conjunctivitis, or other ocular infections
  • Presence of medical history in relation to active or latent tuberculosis
  • Presence or risk of exposure to chickenpox or measles within the last 30 days
  • Presence of untreated fungi, bacteria or systemic viral infection within the last 30 days
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Women of reproductive age who do not use a medically valid contraceptive method
  • Presence of cystic fibrosis
  • Presence of primary ciliary dyskinesia
  • Use of intranasal or systemic first-generation antihistamines, leukotriene receptor antagonists or other nasal decongestants during the study
  • Use of any ophthalmic steroid or nasal, inhaled or systemic steroid during the study
  • Use of another clinical research product during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Azelastine Hydrochloride
Patients that will receive azelastine hydrochloride are defined as the active control arm.
Twice daily inhaled Azelastine Hydrochloride for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Allergodil
Experimental: AI201901
Patients that will receive AI201901 are defined as the test arm.
Twice daily inhaled AI201901 for 4 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Nasal Symptom Score
Time Frame: 28 days
Achieve a statistically significant improvement in the symptoms of allergic rhinitis via Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS).
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
TNNSS; Total non nasal symptom score
Time Frame: 28 days
In non-nasal symptom scores (TNNSS), AI201901 is similar compared to azelastine
28 days
The rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life scale (RQLQ)
Time Frame: 28 days
The rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life scale (RQLQ) indicates that AI201901 is similar compared to azelastine
28 days
Odor Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 28 days
In Odor Visual Analogue Score (VAS) results, AI201901 is better than azelastine
28 days
Inspiratory peak flow meter (PNIF)
Time Frame: 28 days
Inspiratory peak flow meter (PNIF) results show that AI201901 is similar compared to azelastine
28 days
Connecticut butanol odor threshold test
Time Frame: 28 days
Connecticut butanol odor threshold tests show that AI201901 is similar compared to azelastine
28 days
Rhinoscopic Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 28 days
Results of the Rhinoscopic Assessment Scale show that AI201901 is better than azelastine
28 days
Safety of AI201901
Time Frame: 28 days
Demonstration of the safety of AI201901 by comparing the number of participants with treatment-related adverse events in each arm.
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 3, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 2, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Allergic Rhinitis Due to Allergens

Clinical Trials on Azelastine Hydrochloride

Subscribe