Detection of ISUP≥2 Prostate Cancers Using Multiparametric MRI: Prospective Multicenter Comparison of the PI-RADS Score and an Artificial Intelligence System (CHANGE)

February 27, 2024 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Multiparametric MRI of the prostate is recommended before each prostate biopsy. It identifies suspicious areas which will then be the subject of targeted biopsies. However, MRI suffers from low specificity and moderate inter-reader reproducibility, including with the use of the PI-RADS version 2.1 score.

We are developing, within the framework of RHU PERFUSE, a computer-aided diagnosis system (CAD) for the detection of ISUP ≥2 cancers. This system has been trained on a database of patients who had prostate MRI and prostatectomy at the Hospices Civils de Lyon and performed well on a database of patients who had prostate MRI before biopsy at the Hopices civils de Lyon.

However, one of the weaknesses of artificial intelligence systems is their low robustness when tested on MRI images from different manufacturers or institutions.

The goal of the CHANGE study is to build a prospective multicenter cohort of patients who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI followed by systematic and targeted prostate biopsies. The cohort will be used for the final external validation of the CAD developed in PERFUSE.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

420

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of radiology and urology, CHU Pellegrin
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Franck Bladou, Pr
      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of urology and Radiology, CHU Grenoble Alpes
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gaelle Fiard, MD
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of radiology and urology, CHU de Lille
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Arnauld Villers, Pr
      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Recruiting
        • Department of radiology and urology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sébastien Crouzet, Pr
      • Lyon, France, 69007
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of radiology and urology, Hôpital Saint Joseph Saint Luc
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nicolas Arfi, MD
      • Marseille, France, 13003
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Radiology and Urology, Hopital Européen Marseille
        • Contact:
          • Marc ANDRE, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Antoine Van Hove, MD
      • Marseille, France, 13273
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Radiology and Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Marseille
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jochen Walz, MD
      • Montpellier, France, 34070
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Urology, Clinique Beausoleil Montpellier
        • Contact:
      • Montpellier, France, 34090
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of urology and Radiology
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Rodolphe Thuret, Pr
      • Nantes, France, 44800
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department Urology, Clinique urologique Nantes Atlantis
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of radiology and urology, Hôpital la Pitié Salpêtrière
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pierre Mozer, Pr
      • Paris, France, 75015
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of radiology, Hôpital Necker
        • Contact:
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69310
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of urology and radiology, CHLS
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Alain Ruffion, Pr
      • Quint Fonsegrives, France, 31130
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Urology, Quint Fonsegrives
        • Contact:
      • Saint-Etienne, France, 42055
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of urology, CHU de Saint-Étienne Hôpital Nord
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Remi Grange, Dr
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Radiology and Urology, Nouvel Hôpital Civil - CHU de Strasbourg
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thibault Tricard, Pr
      • Toulouse, France, 231059
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Department of Radiology adn Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer ,Toulouse
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • bernard malavaud, Pr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men over 18 years of age
  • Patient with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer referred for a multiparametric MRI of the prostate before a first series of biopsies or before new biopsies after one or more series of negative biopsies
  • PSA ≤ 30 ng / ml
  • Clinical stage ≤ T2c
  • Affiliation or beneficiary of a social security scheme

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men over 80 years of age
  • PSA> 30 ng / ml
  • Stage T3 or T4 on digital rectal examination
  • Previous prostate biopsy performed within 12 months
  • History of prostate cancer diagnosed by biopsy or endourethral resection.
  • History of pelvic radiotherapy regardless of the cause.
  • History of total or focal treatment for prostate cancer.
  • History of hormone therapy
  • MRI performed more than 3 months before biopsy
  • Prostate MRI performed on a machine other than the center's machines accredited for the study.
  • Presence of a hip prosthesis
  • Contraindication to performing an MRI
  • Contraindication to performing prostate biopsy
  • Patient subject to a legal protection measure or deprived of liberty
  • Subject participating or having participated in interventional medical research with an exclusion period still in progress
  • Misunderstanding of the French language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Prospective multicenter cohort

Constitution of a prospective multicenter cohort of 420 patients with suspected prostate cancer that will undergo prostate multiparametric MRI followed by systematic and targeted biopsy.

When available (i.e., at the end of the RHU PERFUSE program, November 2022), the final version of the CAD will be used retrospectively to assess the risk that the prostate/targeted lesions harbor ISUP ≥2 cancer.

In addition, a blood sample will be taken in all patients before the biopsy to assess the performance of the PHI index in predicting the presence of ISUP ≥2 cancer at systematic and targeted biopsy (ancillary study, secondary objective).

Measurement of PHI Index
3 years after inclusion
The PI-RADSv2.1 score will be compared to systematic and targeted biopsy findings (primary objective) and 3-year follow-up (secondary objective)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the non-inferiority of the AUC of the final CAD developed in the PERFUSE program for the detection of ISUP ≥2 cancers, as compared to that of the PI-RADSv2.1 score (human reading), at per-patient analysis.
Time Frame: Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
AUC of the final CAD and of the PI-RADS version 2.1 score for the detection of ISUP ≥2 cancers on systematic and targeted biopsies performed after MRI, at per-patient analysis. A priori-defined non-inferiority margin: 5 percentage points.
Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the specificities of the CAD and of the PI-RADSv2.1 score for the detection of ISUP ≥2 cancers at per-patient, per-lobe and per-lesion analysis.
Time Frame: Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
Specificity of the final CAD and of the PI-RADSv2.1 score for the detection of ISUP ≥2 cancers on systematic and targeted biopsies performed after MRI (per-patient, per-lobe and per-lesion analysis).
Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
Comparison of the sensitivities of the CAD and of the PI-RADSv2.1 score for the detection of ISUP ≥2 cancers at per-patient, per-lobe and per-lesion analysis .
Time Frame: Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
Sensitivity of the final CAD and of the PI-RADSv2.1 score for the detection of ISUP ≥2 cancers on systematic and targeted biopsies performed after MRI (per-patient, per-lobe and per-lesion analysis)
Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
Comparison of the AUCs of the final CAD and of the PI-RADSv2.1 score for predicting the diagnosis of ISUP ≥2 cancer within 3 years, at per-patient analysis.
Time Frame: Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
AUC of the final CAD and the PI-RADSv2.1 score for predicting the diagnosis of ISUP ≥2 cancer within 3 years of follow-up, at per-patient analysis.
Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
Comparison of the sensitivities and specificities of the final CAD and the PI-RADSv2.1 score for predicting the diagnosis of ISUP ≥2 cancer within 3 years, at per-patient analysis.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Sensitivity and specificity of the final CAD and the PI-RADSv2.1 score for predicting the diagnosis of ISUP ≥2 cancer within 3 years of follow-up, at per-patient analysis.
Through study completion, an average of 5 years
Assessment of the impact of biopsy setting, magnetic field strength, human reader's experience, biopsy guidance technique and prostate volume on the AUC of the CAD and the PI-RADSv2.1 scores for the detection of ISUP cancers ≥2, at per-patient analysis.
Time Frame: Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
Analysis of the effect of biopsy setting, magnetic field strength, reader's experience, biopsy guidance technique and prostate volume on the AUC of the final CAD and the PI-RADv2.1, at per-patient analysis.
Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
Comparison of the AUC of the PHI index to that of the final CAD and of the PI-RADSv2.1 score for the detection of ISUP ≥2 cancers, at per-patient analysis.
Time Frame: Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
AUC of the PHI index for the detection of cancers ISUP ≥2 on systematic and targeted biopsies performed after MRI, at per-patient analysis.
Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years
Estimation of the number of biopsies avoided and the number of ISUP cancers ≥2 missed for the following diagnostic strategies:
Time Frame: Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years

Number of biopsies avoided and number of ISUP cancers ≥2 missed according to the strategies described below:

  1. PHI index then, if positive, MRI and biopsies regardless of the MRI result (MRI used only to guide targeted biopsies).
  2. PHI index then, if positive, MRI then, if positive, targeted biopsies.
  3. Biopsy only if MRI positive; no PHI index.
  4. MRI then, if positive, PHI index then, if positive, targeted biopsies.
  5. MRI then, if negative, PHI index; biopsy for patients with a positive MRI or with a negative MRI but a positive PHI index
  6. PHI index and MRI for all patients; biopsy if positive PHI index AND positive MRI.
  7. PHI index and MRI for all patients; biopsy if positive PHI OR positive MRI.
Through recruitment completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Olivier ROUVIERE, Pr, Service d'imagerie, pavillon B Hôpital Edouard Herriot

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After publication of the results of the trial, the CHANGE cohort will be made partially accessible to other investigators wishing to test a CAD system aimed at detecting/localizing prostate cancer on MR images while respecting patient information. Request for access to pseudonymized data will be reviewed by the Trial Steering Committee that will grant access or not. To gain access, requestors will be required to sign a data access agreement. Of note, investigators will have access only to the MR images and not to the histological findings. After analysis of the CHANGE MR images by their CAD system, the investigator will be requested to send the results to the Hospices Civils de Lyon. The comparison between the CAD findings and the targeted and systematic biopsy findings will be made by the Hospices Civils de Lyon that will then inform the investigator of the CAD diagnostic performance.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Blood sample

Subscribe