Diagnostic Criteria in Cardiac Sarcoidosis (ELDORADO)

May 8, 2023 updated by: Borislav Dinov, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital

Evaluation of Diagnostic Criteria in Cardiac Sarcoidosis - an Observational Study

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the accuracy of the current diagnostic criteria of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory condition rarely affecting the heart, exhibiting fluctuating disease activity and eventually leading to ventricular fibrosis. Clinical presentation ranges from no symptoms at all to life-threatening arrhythmias, heart failure and death in severe cases. The heart lesions show patchy distribution and can mimic virtually any other type of cardiomyopathy, which poses significant challenges for the accurate and eary diagnosis.

At present, there are four diagnostic tools and recomendations for diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) that utilize clinical, ECG, laboratory, imaging and biopsy criteria. Recently, it was demonstrated that there is a significant diagreement between these four diagnostic tools. On the other hand, earlier identification of patients with active inflammatory process is necessary, as they are those who will most likely benefit from immunosuppressive therapy.

The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of the current clinical, ECG, laboratory, imaging and biopsy criteria for diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis. Patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis based on clinical symptoms will recieve elaborate diagnostic work-up consisting of: evaluation of symptoms, family history, occupational hazards, ECG, chest X-ray, laboratory markers for sarcoidosis, positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as well as endomyocardial biopsy.

In accordance to the recomendations of the current guidelines, the patients will be devided into 3 groups: 1) patients with proven CS; 2) patients with probable CS; and 3) unlikely CS that will serve as a reference group. The patients in first two groups will be treated with immunosuppressive therapy, mainly glucocorticoids (GC). The follow-up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months will consist of evaluation of the symptoms using dedicated King's Sarcoidosis Questionaire (KSQ), fatigue assessment scale (FAS), Holter-ECG, pacemaker interrogation, laboratory findings, imaging with PET and CMR.

Clinical outcomes will be defined as: 1) improvement of symptoms (FAS score, heart failure class, AV block, ventricular arrhythmias, and KSQ score) and 2) improvement of imaging parameters ( left ventricular ejection fraction, PET activity, myocardial edema, scar in CMR). The outcomes between the groups will be compared using group 3 as reference. Furthermore, patients with improvement with GC (successful therapy) will be compared with those without improvement (unsuccessful therapy) and the predictive value of each diagnostic criterion will be evaluated. Finally, the odds ratios (OR) for each parameter will be used to calculate a diagnostic and predictive score which will be used prospectively to evaluate patients with suspected CS and to guide the therapy.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients presenting at the Heart Center Leipzig, elective and urgent admissions

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with suspected CS due to the following presentations:

    1. age < 65 years and new higher degree AV block, causative coronary artery disease excluded
    2. age < 65 years and new ventricular tachycardia, causative coronary artery disease excluded
    3. age < 65 years and ventricular tachycardia, causative coronary artery disease excluded
    4. extracardiac sarcoidosis and cardiac involvement suggested (palpitations, abnormal ECG, abnormal echocardiography)

To diagnose CS one of the following diagnostic tools will be used:

A) World Association of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders (WASOG)

B) Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of arrhythmias associated with cardiac sarcoidosis

C) Japanese Society of Nuclear Cardiology (JSNC)

Patients whit histological confirmation from myocardial tissue fullfil will be defined as proven CS. (Group 1)

Patients with clinical and imaging findings highly suggesting CS, but without histological confirmation from myocardial biopsy will be defined as probable CS (Group 2)

Patients who do not fullfil the criteria or exhibiting findings suggesting an alternative, more likely diagnosis, will be considered as unlikely CS (Group 3)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
  • patients who are pregnant or lactating
  • noncompliant patients refusing the recommended therapy
  • age < 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical recovery with immunosuppressive therapy
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of patients showing clinical recovery defined as improvement of at least one of the following: decrease of the heart failure class, decrease of fatigue assessed by FAS score, increase of KSQ score with at least 10 points, reduction of burden of ventricular arrhythmias assessed with Holter ECG or device interrogations, improvement of the AV block
1 year
Imaging recovery with immunosuppressive therapy
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of patients with improvement of the cardiac imaging defined as one of the following: increase of the EF with at least 10%, decrease of the PET activity, decrease of the scar or edema in CMR
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac mortality
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of patients who died of cardiac reasons
2 years
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of patients who died of cardiac or non-cardiac reasons
2 years
Unplanned hospitalizations
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of unplanned hospitalizations due to heart failure or ventricular arrhythmias
2 years
Change in LV-EF from baseline
Time Frame: 2 years
Measured in echocardiography or CMR as at least 10% change of the LV EF, LV EDD
2 years
Change in RV function
Time Frame: 2 years
Measured in echocardiography or CMR as 10% change of RV EF, RV diameter, TAPSE
2 years
Patients' quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years
A dedicated King's Sarcoidosis Questionnaire (KSQ) will be used to assess patients condition. Values from 1 to 100 define the patients' condition with higher scores indicating better condition. Improvement will be defined as increase of the KSQ score with at least 10 points.
2 years
VT ablation success
Time Frame: 2 years
Applies only for patients after VT ablation: Time to VT recurrence
2 years
Adverse events of immunosuppressive therapy
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of patients with significant adverse events related to the immunosuppressive therapy
2 years
Changes of immunosuppressive therapy due to lack of success
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of GC dose increase and/or switch to another medication and/or escalation of therapy adding other immunosuppressive drugs to the GC
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Borislav Dinov, MD, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital, Department Electrophysiology
  • Study Chair: Laura Ueberham, MD, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital, Department Electrophysiology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20201231PV1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Clinical Trials on ECG, Echo, laboratory tests, CMR, PET-CT, Biopsy

Subscribe