Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home (GOHOME)

September 19, 2022 updated by: Anthony Sciscione, DO, Christiana Care Health Services

Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home: a Randomized Trial

DILAPAN-S® was FDA-approved for pre-induction cervical ripening in 2015. Since that time, there have been limited studies comparing its efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction to other mechanical cervical ripening techniques. The purpose of this trial is to perform a noninferiority randomized clinical trial comparing DILAPAN-S® to the Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening in term elective labor inductions, examining time spent on the labor and delivery unit, patient safety, and patient satisfaction feedback.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In 2019, Grobman et al, published the ARRIVE trial showing that labor inductions without medical indication at 39 weeks gestation are associated with improved maternal and perinatal outcomes compared to expectant management.1 In the wake of these landmark findings, labor inductions without medical indication are becoming increasingly common not only on a nation scale, but locally as well. Recent data show that labor inductions without medical indication encompass nearly one third of all inductions at Christiana Care Health System.

Labor induction can include both mechanical and pharmacological measures to ripen the cervix and stimulate uterine contractions. The ultimate challenge, which has been the focus of numerous studies to date, is to determine which mechanical and/or pharmacological products and which clinical settings are safest and most efficacious for inducing labor.

Currently, transcervical Foley catheters are the gold-standard mechanical method of cervical ripening. However, new-emerging data has shown that hygroscopic cervical dilators, traditionally used for early pregnancy termination, may be a viable alternative. DILAPAN-S® , a hygroscopic dilator composed of a synthetic hydrogel was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for cervical ripening in 2015 and has been the subject of recent investigation. In a single-center, randomized, open-label trial consisting of 419 patients, Saad et al showed that DILAPAN-S® is not inferior to the Foley catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening at term; there was no significant difference in maternal and neonatal adverse events and patients with DILAPAN-S® were more satisfied than patients with the Foley catheter as far as sleep, relaxing time, and performance of desired daily activities.2

Furthermore, in the pursuit of improving patient satisfaction with consideration of healthcare resources, studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of outpatient mechanical cervical ripening.3 Sciscione et al, showed that in a low-risk population of 1,905 patients, no adverse outcomes were associated with outpatient Foley catheter cervical ripening and patients on average avoided 9.6 hours of hospitalizations compared to the inpatient group.4 The ACOG practice bulletin on induction of labor now states that outpatient cervical ripening, particularly mechanical methods, may be appropriate in select patients.5 Based on the literature cited above, it is plausible to hypothesize that DILAPAN-S® used for outpatient cervical ripening may optimize patient satisfaction and healthcare resource utilization without compromising patient safety and efficacy. The purpose of this trial is to perform a noninferiority randomized clinical trial comparing DILAPAN-S® to the Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening in term elective labor inductions, examining time spent on the labor and delivery unit, patient safety, and patient satisfaction feedback.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Singleton gestation. Twin gestation reduced to singleton, either spontaneously or therapeutically is not eligible unless the reduction occurred before 14 weeks 0 days gestational age.
  • Gestational age at randomization between 39 weeks and 40 weeks 6 days (based on reliable EGA defined as ultrasound performed before 14 weeks 0 days, or a certain LMP consistent with ultrasonography before 21 weeks and 0 days.)
  • Patient prefers outpatient cervical ripening
  • Patient lives within a one-hour commute from the hospital.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Project gestational age at date of first ultrasound is > 20 weeks 6 days
  • Refusal of blood products
  • Participation in another interventional study that influences management of labor at delivery or perinatal morbidity or mortality
  • Delivery planned elsewhere at a non-Christiana site
  • Major maternal medical illness associated with increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes that would preclude her from an outpatient induction (e.g. any diabetes mellitus, lupus, any hypertensive disorder, cardiac disease, renal insufficiency)
  • Medical indication for induction prior to 40 weeks 5 days due to any maternal
  • Heparin or low-molecular weight heparin use during the current pregnancy
  • Cerclage in current pregnancy
  • Prior uterine or cervical surgery (cesarean, myomectomy, cerclage, LEEP, cone biopsy, etc.)
  • Known HIV positivity because of modified delivery plan
  • Iodine or latex allergy
  • Fetal demise or known major fetal anomaly
  • Medical indication for induction prior to 40 weeks 5 days due to any fetal condition
  • Known oligohydramnios, defined as amniotic fluid index < 5 cm or maximal vertical pocket < 2 cm
  • Fetal growth restriction, defined as EFW < 10th percentile
  • Plan for cesarean delivery or contraindication to labor
  • Nonvertex fetal presentation
  • Placenta previa, placenta accrete, or vasa previa
  • Active genital herpes lesions
  • Cervical dilation greater than 3 cm on initial evaluation
  • Signs of labor (regular painful contractions with cervical change) on initial evaluation
  • Active vaginal bleeding greater than bloody show on initial evaluation
  • Ruptured membranes on initial evaluation
  • Non-reassuring fetal status (category II or III fetal heart rate tracing) on initial evaluation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Foley bulb
16F latex or silicone Foley catheter inflated with 30-40 cc of sterile water. The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction.
A 16 F Foley catheter with a 30-mL balloon and stylet is inserted into the endocervical canal under direct visualization by sterile speculum exam or by digital palpation. The Foley catheter is advanced to or past the internal os, and the balloon is filled with 30-40 mL of sterile water. The catheter is then placed on genital traction by taping the end of the catheter to the medial portion of the thigh.
Active Comparator: DILAPAN-S®
Synthetic hydrogel cervical dilator consists of the dilating part, the polypropylene handle, and the marker string. The dilating part is manufactured from an anisotropic xerogel of AQUACRYL.
A bivalve speculum will be used to visualize and prepare the cervix with an antiseptic solution. The DILAPAN-S® (4 x 65 mm) will be inserted in the cervical canal until it traverses the internal os. As many dilators as needed to achieve the desired effect should be inserted. Specific number of pieces always depends on decision and clinical judgement of physician and indications. A gauze pad moistened with sterile water or saline may be inserted into the vagina to help keep the DILAPAN-S® in place, if needed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time spent on the labor and delivery unit
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Length of time spent on the labor and delivery unit, hours
through study completion, an average of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of vaginal delivery
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of cesarean delivery
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Indication for cesarean delivery
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Reasons for cesarean delivery include: non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing, arrest of dilation, arrest of descent, failed induction of labor, maternal request, other
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Time from device insertion to delivery
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Time from device (Foley bulb or Dilapan) insertion to delivery (vaginal or cesarean), hours
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours of device insertion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of vaginal delivery within 36 hours of device insertion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Time from device insertion to expulsion or extraction
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Time from device (Foley bulb or Dilapan) insertion to spontaneous expulsion or device removal, hours
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of device expulsion at home
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Percentage of patients whose device (Foley bulb or Dilapan) was expelled at home
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of patients that received Pitocin
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Average number of Dilapan dilator rods used
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Multiple Dilapan rods may be placed for cervical dilation. The number of rods used is at the discretion of the clinician.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Change in Bishop score before and after mechanical cervical ripening
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Change in Bishop score from initial assessment to first exam following device expulsion/removal.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Time from device insertion to active stage of labor
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
The active stage of labor is defined as cervical dilation greater than or equal to 6cm, hours
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of artificial rupture of membranes
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of epidural or spinal anesthesia during labor
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of analgesia needed for device insertion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Analgesia methods may include butorphanol, neuraxial blockade, nitric oxide, etc.
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of complications from device insertion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Complications include: incidental rupture of membranes, device malfunction/breakage, vaginal bleeding (defined as gross blood apparent on glove, perineum, vagina, or within Foley catheter lumen), cervical laceration, vasovagal reaction
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of tachysystole
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Defined as at least 6 contractions in 10 minutes for 2 consecutive 10-minute periods
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of postpartum hemorrhage
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Defined as 1,000 mL or blood loss accompanied by signs or symptoms of hypovolemia within 24 hours after the birth process
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of shoulder dystocia
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of suspected intraamniotic infection
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Defined as the presence of maternal intrapartum fever and one or more of the following: maternal leukocytosis, purulent cervical drainage, or fetal tachycardia
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of any serious maternal morbidity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Serious maternal morbidities include uterine rupture, admission to an intensive care unit, and sepsis
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of maternal death
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Maternal satisfaction
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
A two-part maternal satisfaction survey will be administered immediately after device placement and then postpartum day one
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of 1 minute Apgar score < 5
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of 1 minute Apgar score less than 5
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of 5 minute Apgar score < 7
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of 5 minute Apgar score less than 7
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of NICU admission
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of neonates admitted to the NICU
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of NICU admission > 48 hours
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of neonates requiring NICU admission for longer than 48 hours
through study completion, an average of 2 years
NICU length of stay
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Length of NICU admission, days
through study completion, an average of 2 years
Rate of any adverse neonatal outcome
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
Includes death, severe respiratory distress syndrome (defined as intubation and mechanical ventilation for a minimum of 12 hours), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, seizure, culture-proven neonatal sepsis, birth trauma (bone fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, neurologic injury, retinal hemorrhage), hypotension requiring vasopressor support, receipt of total body cooling.
through study completion, an average of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Anthony C Sciscione, DO, Christiana Care Health Services

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DDD#604684

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn

Clinical Trials on Foley bulb placement

3
Subscribe