- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04739683
Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home (GOHOME)
Cervical Ripening With Foley Bulb Versus Dilapan-S at Home: a Randomized Trial
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In 2019, Grobman et al, published the ARRIVE trial showing that labor inductions without medical indication at 39 weeks gestation are associated with improved maternal and perinatal outcomes compared to expectant management.1 In the wake of these landmark findings, labor inductions without medical indication are becoming increasingly common not only on a nation scale, but locally as well. Recent data show that labor inductions without medical indication encompass nearly one third of all inductions at Christiana Care Health System.
Labor induction can include both mechanical and pharmacological measures to ripen the cervix and stimulate uterine contractions. The ultimate challenge, which has been the focus of numerous studies to date, is to determine which mechanical and/or pharmacological products and which clinical settings are safest and most efficacious for inducing labor.
Currently, transcervical Foley catheters are the gold-standard mechanical method of cervical ripening. However, new-emerging data has shown that hygroscopic cervical dilators, traditionally used for early pregnancy termination, may be a viable alternative. DILAPAN-S® , a hygroscopic dilator composed of a synthetic hydrogel was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for cervical ripening in 2015 and has been the subject of recent investigation. In a single-center, randomized, open-label trial consisting of 419 patients, Saad et al showed that DILAPAN-S® is not inferior to the Foley catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening at term; there was no significant difference in maternal and neonatal adverse events and patients with DILAPAN-S® were more satisfied than patients with the Foley catheter as far as sleep, relaxing time, and performance of desired daily activities.2
Furthermore, in the pursuit of improving patient satisfaction with consideration of healthcare resources, studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of outpatient mechanical cervical ripening.3 Sciscione et al, showed that in a low-risk population of 1,905 patients, no adverse outcomes were associated with outpatient Foley catheter cervical ripening and patients on average avoided 9.6 hours of hospitalizations compared to the inpatient group.4 The ACOG practice bulletin on induction of labor now states that outpatient cervical ripening, particularly mechanical methods, may be appropriate in select patients.5 Based on the literature cited above, it is plausible to hypothesize that DILAPAN-S® used for outpatient cervical ripening may optimize patient satisfaction and healthcare resource utilization without compromising patient safety and efficacy. The purpose of this trial is to perform a noninferiority randomized clinical trial comparing DILAPAN-S® to the Foley catheter for outpatient cervical ripening in term elective labor inductions, examining time spent on the labor and delivery unit, patient safety, and patient satisfaction feedback.
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Singleton gestation. Twin gestation reduced to singleton, either spontaneously or therapeutically is not eligible unless the reduction occurred before 14 weeks 0 days gestational age.
- Gestational age at randomization between 39 weeks and 40 weeks 6 days (based on reliable EGA defined as ultrasound performed before 14 weeks 0 days, or a certain LMP consistent with ultrasonography before 21 weeks and 0 days.)
- Patient prefers outpatient cervical ripening
- Patient lives within a one-hour commute from the hospital.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Project gestational age at date of first ultrasound is > 20 weeks 6 days
- Refusal of blood products
- Participation in another interventional study that influences management of labor at delivery or perinatal morbidity or mortality
- Delivery planned elsewhere at a non-Christiana site
- Major maternal medical illness associated with increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes that would preclude her from an outpatient induction (e.g. any diabetes mellitus, lupus, any hypertensive disorder, cardiac disease, renal insufficiency)
- Medical indication for induction prior to 40 weeks 5 days due to any maternal
- Heparin or low-molecular weight heparin use during the current pregnancy
- Cerclage in current pregnancy
- Prior uterine or cervical surgery (cesarean, myomectomy, cerclage, LEEP, cone biopsy, etc.)
- Known HIV positivity because of modified delivery plan
- Iodine or latex allergy
- Fetal demise or known major fetal anomaly
- Medical indication for induction prior to 40 weeks 5 days due to any fetal condition
- Known oligohydramnios, defined as amniotic fluid index < 5 cm or maximal vertical pocket < 2 cm
- Fetal growth restriction, defined as EFW < 10th percentile
- Plan for cesarean delivery or contraindication to labor
- Nonvertex fetal presentation
- Placenta previa, placenta accrete, or vasa previa
- Active genital herpes lesions
- Cervical dilation greater than 3 cm on initial evaluation
- Signs of labor (regular painful contractions with cervical change) on initial evaluation
- Active vaginal bleeding greater than bloody show on initial evaluation
- Ruptured membranes on initial evaluation
- Non-reassuring fetal status (category II or III fetal heart rate tracing) on initial evaluation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Foley bulb
16F latex or silicone Foley catheter inflated with 30-40 cc of sterile water.
The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction.
|
A 16 F Foley catheter with a 30-mL balloon and stylet is inserted into the endocervical canal under direct visualization by sterile speculum exam or by digital palpation.
The Foley catheter is advanced to or past the internal os, and the balloon is filled with 30-40 mL of sterile water.
The catheter is then placed on genital traction by taping the end of the catheter to the medial portion of the thigh.
|
Active Comparator: DILAPAN-S®
Synthetic hydrogel cervical dilator consists of the dilating part, the polypropylene handle, and the marker string.
The dilating part is manufactured from an anisotropic xerogel of AQUACRYL.
|
A bivalve speculum will be used to visualize and prepare the cervix with an antiseptic solution.
The DILAPAN-S® (4 x 65 mm) will be inserted in the cervical canal until it traverses the internal os.
As many dilators as needed to achieve the desired effect should be inserted.
Specific number of pieces always depends on decision and clinical judgement of physician and indications.
A gauze pad moistened with sterile water or saline may be inserted into the vagina to help keep the DILAPAN-S® in place, if needed
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time spent on the labor and delivery unit
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Length of time spent on the labor and delivery unit, hours
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of vaginal delivery
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Rate of cesarean delivery
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Indication for cesarean delivery
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Reasons for cesarean delivery include: non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing, arrest of dilation, arrest of descent, failed induction of labor, maternal request, other
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Time from device insertion to delivery
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Time from device (Foley bulb or Dilapan) insertion to delivery (vaginal or cesarean), hours
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of vaginal delivery within 24 hours of device insertion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Rate of vaginal delivery within 36 hours of device insertion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Time from device insertion to expulsion or extraction
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Time from device (Foley bulb or Dilapan) insertion to spontaneous expulsion or device removal, hours
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of device expulsion at home
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Percentage of patients whose device (Foley bulb or Dilapan) was expelled at home
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of patients that received Pitocin
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Average number of Dilapan dilator rods used
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Multiple Dilapan rods may be placed for cervical dilation.
The number of rods used is at the discretion of the clinician.
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Change in Bishop score before and after mechanical cervical ripening
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Change in Bishop score from initial assessment to first exam following device expulsion/removal.
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Time from device insertion to active stage of labor
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
The active stage of labor is defined as cervical dilation greater than or equal to 6cm, hours
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of artificial rupture of membranes
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Rate of epidural or spinal anesthesia during labor
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Rate of analgesia needed for device insertion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Analgesia methods may include butorphanol, neuraxial blockade, nitric oxide, etc.
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of complications from device insertion
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Complications include: incidental rupture of membranes, device malfunction/breakage, vaginal bleeding (defined as gross blood apparent on glove, perineum, vagina, or within Foley catheter lumen), cervical laceration, vasovagal reaction
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of tachysystole
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Defined as at least 6 contractions in 10 minutes for 2 consecutive 10-minute periods
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of postpartum hemorrhage
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Defined as 1,000 mL or blood loss accompanied by signs or symptoms of hypovolemia within 24 hours after the birth process
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of shoulder dystocia
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Rate of suspected intraamniotic infection
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Defined as the presence of maternal intrapartum fever and one or more of the following: maternal leukocytosis, purulent cervical drainage, or fetal tachycardia
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of any serious maternal morbidity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Serious maternal morbidities include uterine rupture, admission to an intensive care unit, and sepsis
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of maternal death
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
|
Maternal satisfaction
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
A two-part maternal satisfaction survey will be administered immediately after device placement and then postpartum day one
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of 1 minute Apgar score < 5
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of 1 minute Apgar score less than 5
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of 5 minute Apgar score < 7
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of 5 minute Apgar score less than 7
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of NICU admission
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of neonates admitted to the NICU
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of NICU admission > 48 hours
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of neonates requiring NICU admission for longer than 48 hours
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
NICU length of stay
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Length of NICU admission, days
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Rate of any adverse neonatal outcome
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Includes death, severe respiratory distress syndrome (defined as intubation and mechanical ventilation for a minimum of 12 hours), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, seizure, culture-proven neonatal sepsis, birth trauma (bone fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, neurologic injury, retinal hemorrhage), hypotension requiring vasopressor support, receipt of total body cooling.
|
through study completion, an average of 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anthony C Sciscione, DO, Christiana Care Health Services
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
- Saad AF, Villarreal J, Eid J, Spencer N, Ellis V, Hankins GD, Saade GR. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):275.e1-275.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):386-397. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5. No abstract available.
- Sciscione AC, Bedder CL, Hoffman MK, Ruhstaller K, Shlossman PA. The timing of adverse events with Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening; implications for outpatient use. Am J Perinatol. 2014 Oct;31(9):781-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359718. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
- Levine LD, Sciscione AC. Foley Catheter for Outpatient Cervical Ripening: Review of the Evidence and a Proposed Model of Care. Am J Perinatol. 2019 Dec;36(14):1528-1532. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1677473. Epub 2019 Jan 23. No abstract available.
- Albers LL. The duration of labor in healthy women. J Perinatol. 1999 Mar;19(2):114-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200100.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- DDD#604684
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn
-
Holy Family Hospital, Nazareth, IsraelRecruitingInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornIsrael
-
Meir Medical CenterActive, not recruitingInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornIsrael
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornUnited States
-
Rambam Health Care CampusCompletedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornIsrael
-
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.Ferring PharmaceuticalsTerminatedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornUnited States
-
Ascension Genesys HospitalCompletedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornUnited States
-
Ain Shams Maternity HospitalUnknownInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornEgypt
-
Ain Shams Maternity HospitalDr. Ahmed S. Abd El-Hameed; Prof. Abdel-Megeeed I. Abdel- MegeeedCompletedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornEgypt
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompletedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn
-
Hawaii Pacific HealthRecruitingInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornUnited States
Clinical Trials on Foley bulb placement
-
Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterUnknown
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonCompleted
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonActive, not recruitingLabor Induction | Early AmniotomyUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornUnited States
-
Lehigh Valley HospitalRecruitingPregnancy OutcomeUnited States
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonMedicem International CR s.r.o.CompletedPre-induction Dilation of CervixUnited States
-
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterCompleted
-
The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonActive, not recruitingInduced Vaginal DeliveryUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoTerminatedStroke | Catheter Associated Urinary Tract InfectionUnited States
-
David L Zisow MD LLCCompleted