BEAT-IT: Behavioural Activation and Severe Learning Disabilities

February 5, 2021 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Behavioural Activation (BeatIt) for Depression in Adults With Severe Intellectual Disabilities. A Feasibility Randomised Controlled Study of BeatIt Versus Treatment as Usual

Depression is common, but no psychological interventions have been tested to see if they work for adults with severe intellectual disabilities. The research team recently successfully completed a full-scale trial of a psychological intervention, BeatIt, for depressed adults with mild/moderate intellectual disabilities. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the feasibility of modifying BeatIt for depressed adults with severe intellectual disabilities, collecting the information needed on likely recruitment, measures, and waiting list control arm options, to design a full-scale study.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Scotland
      • Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom, G120XH
        • Recruiting
        • Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow
        • Contact:
          • Andrew Jahoda, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Andrew Jahoda, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe/profound intellectual disabilities
  • 18 years old and over
  • Clinically significant unipolar depression
  • Has a family member or paid carer who has supported them for a minimum of 6 months to complete the screening and baseline visits OR is able to obtain information for the previous 4 months prior to randomisation. The carer, or another named individual, should be available for weekly-fortnightly treatment sessions with the practitioner, and should currently provide a minimum of 10 hours support per week to the participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suicidal
  • Mild/moderate intellectual disabilities
  • Factors that prevent the person from interacting with the carer and therapist or retaining information from the therapy (e.g. late stage dementia, significant agitation, withdrawal arising from psychosis)
  • Does not consent to her/his GP being contacted about their participation in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Behavioural activation
The treatment is designed to be delivered to individuals alongside a carer who provides regular support to them. It is a structured, time limited, manualised psychological therapy, developed to treat those with an intellectual disability and depressive symptoms.
A psychological intervention which aims to increase activity and reduce depressive symptoms.
No Intervention: Treatment as usual
This will include the existing treatments available in NHS and social care for adults with intellectual disability with depression, including anti-depressants, mood stabilizers, and any available psychological interventions. Additionally, for all those in the study, we will provide their General Practitioner with a summary of the NICE guidelines on treatment of depression for adults with intellectual disabilities.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline on the Mood, Interest and Pleasure Questionnaire (MIPQ) at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 24

A measure of the individuals mood and engagement in activities. The score range for each sub-scale is 0 - 24.

Total score range is 0 - 48. Lower scores indicate lower mood and lower levels of interest and pleasure (within the last 2 week)

Baseline and week 24
Change from baseline on Intellectual Disabilities Depression Scale (IDDS) at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 24
This is a 38-item behavioural checklist derived from DSM-III-R criteria, designed to measure the frequency of identified depressive behaviours within a four-week period. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 (never) to 6 (always). All scores are summed to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 228. Higher scores indicate a higher frequency of depressive symptoms.
Baseline and week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline on the Anxiety, Depression and Mood Scale at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 24

This scale has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of anxiety in adults with severe/profound intellectual disabilities. The 7 item 'generalised anxiety' sub-scale was used.

Items are rated on a four-point Likert scale for frequency from 0 (never) to 3 (always) and for severity 0 (not a problem) to 3 (severe problem). Items are based on informants' observations in the last 2 weeks. Scores are summed. The possible score range for frequency of anxiety symptoms is 0-21, total score range for severity of anxiety symptoms is 0 - 21 and total score is 0 - 42. Higher scores indicate a higher frequency of anxiety symptoms and higher severity of anxiety symptoms.

Baseline and week 24
Change from baseline on the Modified Index of Community Involvement (ICI) at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 24

This scale provides a measure of participation in social and community-based activities during the previous 4 weeks. This is a 16-item scale, measuring participation in social activities (5 items), community activities (10 items) and going on holiday (1 item).

The informant is asked to rate whether the participant has participated in any of these events in the last month (12 months for the item 'been on holiday'), and if so, how many times (once through to five times or more). All items are rated on a 6-point Likert scale (0 = not participated, 5 = participated 5x or more). All scores are summed. The possible score range for the social activities sub-scale is 0-25, the possible score range for the community activities subscale is 0-50 and the total scale score range is 0-80. Higher scores indicate a higher frequency of engagement in social and community activities.

Baseline and week 24
Change from baseline on the Modified Index of Domestic Participation at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 24
This scale measures participation in 13 household tasks during the previous 4 weeks. All items are rated on a three-point Likert scale (0 - no participation, 1 - participation with help, 2 - independent participation). Scores are summed, with a possible score range of 0 - 26. Higher scores indicate higher levels of independent participation in domestic tasks.
Baseline and week 24
Change from baseline on the Emotional Difficulties self-efficacy scale at 24 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and week 24
This is a 10-item scale which measures the carer's confidence in supporting the person when they are feeling down. All item are scored on a 9-point Likert scale, where 0 indicates 'not at all confident' and 8 indicates 'extremely confident'. All scores are summed with a possible score range of 0 - 80. Higher scores indicate a higher level of self-confidence in supporting someone when they are feeling down.
Baseline and week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew Jahoda, PhD, Professor of Learning Disabilities

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Behavioural Activation

3
Subscribe