Impact of Clotting on Dialyzer Efficiency

August 9, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Ghent

Assessment of a Relation Between Dialyzer Clearance and Clotting in Hemodialyzer

Coagulation within the dialyzer membrane fibres is an obvious biological sign of bio-incompatibility. To avoid clotting during extracorporeal treatment, an anticoagulant is added to the circuit, resulting in an increased risk for bleeding complications. In addition, there is evidence that a substantial number of fibers can become blocked before this is reflected in routinely observed parameters, or in termination of the dialysis session. Little is known about the impact of such subclinical clotting on dialyzer performance in terms of solute clearance. Membrane clogging may influence both the diffusive and convective transport characteristics of the dialyzer membrane before leading to complete dialyzer clotting. In 2018, we described a method to objectively count the number of blocked fibres inside a dialyzer using a micro-CT scanning technique. In the present trial, we use this method to assess the number of open fibers post dialysis, and this for three different dialysis durations and in two different dialyzer types. Just before the termination of the dialysis session, dialyzer clearance is assessed for different solutes from concentration measurements in blood samples as taken from the dialyzer inlet and outlet line.

The aim of this randomized cross-over study is to objectively quantify the impact of blocked fibers on the performance of different dialyzer membranes: ATA™ (asymmetric triacetate) membrane in the Solacea™ dialyzer, and polysulfone membrane in the FX800Cordiax dialyzer, and this with a decreased anticoagulation dose.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This single centre, randomized cross-over study includes ten consecutive stable chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients who experienced stable dialysis sessions during the last 4 weeks, and had no known coagulation disorder, active inflammation or malignancy. Double-needle vascular access is achieved through a native arterio-venous fistula or a well-functioning double lumen tunnelled central venous catheter. Patients are followed during 6 consecutive midweek dialysis sessions. At midweek, patients receive only 1/4th of their regular brand of Low-Molecular Weight Heparin anticoagulation at the beginning of the dialysis session. All test sessions are performed with blood flow at 300mL/min and dialysate flow at 500mL/min in post dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) mode (substitution flow 75mL/min). Ultrafiltration rates are set according to the patient's interdialytic weight gain and clinical status.

Patients are randomized for hemodialyzer type and dialysis duration:

  1. ATA™ Solacea 19H - 60min dialysis
  2. ATA™ Solacea 19H - 120min dialysis
  3. ATA™ Solacea 19H - 240min dialysis
  4. polysulfone FX800Cordiax - 60min dialysis
  5. polysulfone FX800Cordiax - 120min dialysis
  6. polysulfone FX800Cordiax - 240min dialysis

Just before the termination of the 6 experimental midweek sessions, blood is sampled from the inlet and outlet blood lines. Blood samples are immediately centrifuged and serum vials are stored at -80°C until batch analysis. Post dialysis, dialyzers are rinsed and dried and scanned with micro computed tomography (CT) to count the number of open fibers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Ghent University Hospital - Nephrology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • experienced stable dialysis sessions during the last 4 weeks
  • double needle/lumen well-functioning vascular access

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known coagulation disorder
  • active inflammation
  • malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Solacea_60min
  • blood sampling from dialyzer inlet and outlet line at 60min, just before dialysis termination
  • microCT scanning of rinsed and dried hemodialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated in two different commercially available dialyzers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated for three different dialysis durations
Experimental: Solacea_120min
  • blood sampling from dialyzer inlet and outlet line at 120min, just before dialysis termination
  • microCT scanning of rinsed and dried hemodialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated in two different commercially available dialyzers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated for three different dialysis durations
Experimental: Solacea_240min
  • blood sampling from dialyzer inlet and outlet line at 240min, just before dialysis termination
  • microCT scanning of rinsed and dried hemodialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated in two different commercially available dialyzers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated for three different dialysis durations
Experimental: FX800_60min
  • blood sampling from dialyzer inlet and outlet line at 60min, just before dialysis termination
  • microCT scanning of rinsed and dried hemodialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated in two different commercially available dialyzers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated for three different dialysis durations
Experimental: FX800_120min
  • blood sampling from dialyzer inlet and outlet line at 120min, just before dialysis termination
  • microCT scanning of rinsed and dried hemodialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated in two different commercially available dialyzers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated for three different dialysis durations
Experimental: FX800_240min
  • blood sampling from dialyzer inlet and outlet line at 240min, just before dialysis termination
  • microCT scanning of rinsed and dried hemodialyzer, post dialysis in order to count open fibers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated in two different commercially available dialyzers
Fiber blocking and dialyzer clearance is calculated for three different dialysis durations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fibre blocking in hemodialyzers
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Fibre blocking as assessed post dialysis by a reference microCT scanning technique
6 weeks
Hemodialyzer performance
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Dialyzer performance based on calculated clearances for different solutes
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wim Van Biesen, University Hospital, Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UGent_FiberClotting_2

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemodialysis

Clinical Trials on Dialyzer type

Subscribe