Operative vs Non-Operative Management of Acute Appendicitis and Acute Cholecystitis in COVID-19 Positive Patients

March 10, 2022 updated by: Clayton Petro, The Cleveland Clinic
This study evaluates operative and non-operative management of acute appendicitis (infection or inflammation of the appendix) and acute cholecystitis (inflammation/infection of the gallbladder) in patients with active mild to moderate COVID-19 infection. The hypothesis is that COVID+ patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis or acute cholecystitis amendable to a laparoscopic procedure can have safe operative outcomes compared to those managed non-operatively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disseminates across the United States, more routine preoperative testing is going to expose infected patients with no or mild pneumonia symptoms. Currently, little is known regarding the true consequences of general anesthesia in COVID-positive (COVID+) patients. Surgeons are going to face challenging decisions regarding whether or not to operate for non-elective cases requiring general anesthesia when non-operative treatment options exist. Patients with acute appendicitis are usually treated with an operation to remove the appendix, but they can also be initially treated with antibiotics and have an operation at a later date. Similarly, patients with acute cholecystitis are usually treated with an operation to remove the gallbladder, but they can be treated with antibiotics and a percutaneous cholecystostomy tube (a tube that going through the skin to drain the gallbladder) and have an operation at a later date. However, patients managed without a definitive operation may require more resource utilization, PPE consumption, interactions with hospital personnel, and could experience treatment failures that exacerbate their viral illness. This is a pilot study comparing the safety of operative versus non-operative management of COVID+ patients with mild to moderate symptoms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • COVID-19 confirmed positive by a microbiologic test.
  • Mild COVID-19 - no or mild pneumonia
  • EITHER

    1. Uncomplicated acute appendicitis without a fecalith OR
    2. Acute cholecystitis - by TG18/TG13 diagnostic criteria where definite diagnosis requires one item in A + one item in B + C A. Local signs of inflammation etc.
    1. Murphy's sign
    2. RUQ mass/pain/tenderness B. Systemic signs of inflammation etc.
    1. Fever
    2. elevated CRP
    3. elevated WBC count C. Imaging findings characteristic of acute cholecystitis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active pregnancy
  • COVID-19 severe disease that would be a contraindication to operative intervention at the discretion of the attending surgeon supported by the following, none of which are individually required or are a strict exclusion criterion as some of these could be attributed or exacerbated by the underlying surgical problem:

    1. Persistent dyspnea
    2. Persistent respiratory frequency >30/min
    3. Persistent blood oxygen saturation <93%
    4. Partial pressure of arterial oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio <300
    5. Lung infiltrates >50%
  • COVID-19 critical disease - respiratory failure, shock, or multiorgan dysfunction
  • The surgeon expects increased operative complexity - high risk of conversion to open or prolonged procedure
  • Unable or unwilling to consent or fulfill study procedures - need to complete 90 day follow-up by telephone

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Operative management
Treatment with surgery
Patients will undergo surgical removal of the affected organ. The initial approach will be in a minimally invasive, laparoscopic fashion. If necessary, conversion to an open operation may be performed. These patients will be treated preoperatively and postoperatively with similar antibiotic regimens, however the duration of antibiotic therapies will be dependent on factors such as intraoperative findings, resolution of laboratory abnormalities, and tolerance of oral medications.
Active Comparator: Non-operative management
Treatment with antibiotics

Patients will be treated with 3 days of intravenous antibiotics followed by 7 days of oral antibiotics, as described below:

Non-penicillin allergic patients

  • piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375g IV every 6 hours for 3 days
  • amoxicillin/clavulanate 875/125mg by mouth every 12 hours for 7 days

Penicillin allergic patients

  • ertapenem 1g IV every 24 hours for 3 days
  • ciprofloxacin 500mg every 12 hours AND metronidazole 500mg every 8 hours for 7 days

Patients may be considered to have failed non-operative management (e.g. treatment failure) if they experience absence of clinical improvement, worsening abdominal pain and/or localized/diffuse peritonitis in the judgment of the treating surgeon at any point within the study window. If this occurs, then surgeons may proceed with rescue appendectomy or percutaneous drainage in the setting of appendicitis, or with placement of a percutaneous cholecystostomy tube in the setting of acute cholecystitis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Pulmonary Complications
Time Frame: Up to 90 days

Including pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or unexpected postoperative ventilation

For operative management this means any episode of non-invasive ventilation, invasive ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after initial extubation after surgery, or patient cannot be extubated as planned after surgery.

For non-operative management this means any intubation

Up to 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Post-intervention ICU Admission
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
ICU admission following randomization
Up to 90 days
Mortality (All Cause)
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Any death
Up to 90 days
Complications as Measured by the Clavien-Dindo Classification
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
The Clavien-Dindo classification is a grading scale from 1 to 5 (with 5 being more severe0 to objectively describe the severity of a complication, including any deviation from the normal postoperative course
Up to 90 days
Median Length of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Cumulative and individual length of hospitalization(s)
Up to 90 days
Number of Emergency Room Visits/Readmission
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Up to 90 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment Failure for Non-operative Management
Time Frame: Up to 90 days
Patients randomized to non-operative management who require non-elective surgery to remove the affected organ
Up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Clayton C Petro, MD, Associate Professor of Surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Operative management

Subscribe