- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04752007
Movement of the Sacroiliac (SI) Joint, Comparing Conventional RSA With the Sectra Implant Movement Analysis. (IMSRA)
Accuracy of the CT-Implant Movement Analysis. A Feasibility Study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Radiation: ASLR; RSA; SI joint movement: stright leg raise with 1 kg load
- Radiation: Fig.Four; RSA; SI joint movement: One side figure of four position with 1 kg load
- Radiation: Supine; RSA; SI joint movement: supine position
- Radiation: ASLR; CT; SI joint movement: stright leg raise with 1 kg load
- Radiation: Fig.Four; CT; SI joint movement: One side figure of four position with 1 kg load
- Radiation: Supine; CT; SI joint movement: supine position
Detailed Description
Abstract Background: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is a high precision in vivo measuring method and regarded as the gold standard for motion analysis. RSA has been around for over 40 years and its accuracy is properly evaluated. The CT technics have evolved and now low dose CT scans can reproduce 3-D models of bone and joints. The Sectra Implant Movement analysis (IMA) is a new method using a low dose CT for high accuracy measurement. There is no study evaluating the precision and accuracy of the new CT based method.The investigator want to compare the accuracy of the two methods.
Method/design: The RSA method will be tested in patients that already have tantalum markers inserted around the SI joints from earlier studies conducted at Ullevål University Hospital. There are 2-6 patients in the age of 40-50 years available for RSA analysis with and without provocation of the SI joints. Some are fused in one SI joint after insertion of the tantalum markers, but the contralateral joint can then be used for the analysis. At the same time,the investigator will perform low dose CT with and without provocation of the SI joints. The results of the analysis will be compared.
Discussion: The conventional RSA is an invasive method using tantalum markers inserted in to bone. If the CT method has the same accuracy, then the tantalum markers will become obsolete and future studies can easily be performed using non-invasive low dose CT scans.
Keywords: RSA, CT method, low dose CT, IS joint, movement
Introduction:
Because of the high accuracy and precision, radiostereometric analysis (RSA), has become a well- established method for three-dimensional (3-D) measurements of micro motion in joints. The implantation of tantalum markers is invasive, but no reports of patient injuries are reported. The markers might be inserted through the approach used during a surgical intervention or in an extra stab incisions in the skin to get the markers to the necessary position in the bony structures. The placements of the markers are of outmost importance to achieve good quality measurements. At least three no collinear markers in each segment and a good distance and distribution in all three axes (X, Z, Y) is essential for a good 3-D configuration.
The CT techniques have evolved and now low dose CT scans can reproduce 3-D models of bone and joints. The Sectra Implant movement analysis (IMA) is a non-invasive method using a low dose CT scan. No tantalum markers are needed and joint provocation can easily be conducted in the CT. The CT scan is then sent to the Sectra AB for analysis.
Method:
Patients and methods:
The RSA method will be tested in patients that already have tantalum markers inserted around the SI joints from earlier studies , approximately five years ago, conducted at Ullevål University Hospital. These are patients with long lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. There are six patients in the age of 40-50 years available for RSA analysis with and without provocation of the SI joints, at the same time the investigator will perform low dose CT with and without provocation of the SI joints. For the non-provocation, the patient will be in a supine-position. The provocation x-ray/low dose CT will be performed; 1: anterior straight leg raise 2: One side figure of four position, both with 1kg of load. Some are fused in one SI joint after insertion of the tantalum markers, but the contralateral joint can then be used for the analysis. The investigators will also measure eventual movement in the fused joint and the symphysis (if tantalum markers present). The Center for Implant and Radiostereometric Research Oslo has extensive experience with RSA and established state of the art measuring method of movement in the SI joint. They will perform the RSA measurements. The CT scan is send to the Sectra AB for analysis.
Statistical analysis:
Null hypothesis (H0): There is no difference in the accuracy Alternate Hypothesis (H1): There is a difference in the accuracy Continuous variables will be described with mean and standard deviation\, and the normality of the data will be checked using the histograms, QQ-plots and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov-Test of normality. The differences of motion will also be tested for normality. The paired sample T-test will be used to detect possible significance in the difference between the two groups. Non-parametric tests are used if the assumption of normality does not hold. All analysis will be conducted using commercially available software (SPSS version 24, IBM Inc.) and the level of significance is set to p<0.05 in a two-sided test.
Participants Project leader and responsible institution Stephan M. Röhrl, PhD, MD, Ass. Professor, Head of Center for Implant and Radiostereometric Research Oslo, President of Knee and Hip Register, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
PhD candidate Vinjar Myklevoll, MD, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen. Collaborating partner Thomas Kibsgård, Ass. Professor, PhD, MD, President Pelvic Girdle Pain Society, Head of Department Rikshospitalet, Oslo, OUS.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway
- Cirro at Ullevål Uiversity Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The RSA method will be tested in patients that already have tantalum markers inserted around the SI joints from earlier studies, approximately five years ago, conducted at Ullevål University Hospital.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patients that can not perfome the provocation images of the SI joints.
- Pregnancy
- Not able to or do not want to participate
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: RSA group
Conventional RSA to measure the movement in th SI joint.
|
Measurement of the SI joint movement in mikrometer
Measurement of the SI joint movement in mikrometer
Baseline position
|
Active Comparator: CT group
Low dose CT to measure the movement in th SI joint.
|
Measurement of the SI joint movement in mikrometer
Measurement of the SI joint movement in mikrometer
Baseline position
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Movement of the SI joint in mikrometer
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Movement analysis
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Stephan M Rohrl, PhD, Oslo University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Broden C, Olivecrona H, Maguire GQ Jr, Noz ME, Zeleznik MP, Skoldenberg O. Accuracy and Precision of Three-Dimensional Low Dose CT Compared to Standard RSA in Acetabular Cups: An Experimental Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:5909741. doi: 10.1155/2016/5909741. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
- Axelsson P, Karlsson BS. Intervertebral mobility in the progressive degenerative process. A radiostereometric analysis. Eur Spine J. 2004 Oct;13(6):567-72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-004-0713-5. Epub 2004 May 19.
- Fayyazi AH, Ordway NR, Park SA, Fredrickson BE, Yonemura K, Yuan HA. Radiostereometric analysis of postoperative motion after application of dynesys dynamic posterior stabilization system for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jun;23(4):236-41. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a4bb0b.
- Nabhan A, Al-Yhary A, Ishak B, Steudel WI, Kollmar O, Steimer O. Analysis of spinal kinematics following implantation of lumbar spine disc prostheses versus fusion: radiological study. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2007;17(3):207-16. doi: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v17.i3.40.
- Sturesson B, Uden A, Vleeming A. A radiostereometric analysis of the movements of the sacroiliac joints in the reciprocal straddle position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jan 15;25(2):214-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001150-00012.
- Sturesson B, Uden A, Vleeming A. A radiostereometric analysis of movements of the sacroiliac joints during the standing hip flexion test. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1;25(3):364-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00018.
- Zoega B, Karrholm J, Lind B. Plate fixation adds stability to two-level anterior fusion in the cervical spine: a randomized study using radiostereometry. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(4):302-7. doi: 10.1007/s005860050079.
- Broden C, Sandberg O, Skoldenberg O, Stigbrand H, Hanni M, Giles JW, Emery R, Lazarinis S, Nystrom A, Olivecrona H. Low-dose CT-based implant motion analysis is a precise tool for early migration measurements of hip cups: a clinical study of 24 patients. Acta Orthop. 2020 Jun;91(3):260-265. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1725345. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
- Nagamoto Y, Iwasaki M, Sakaura H, Sugiura T, Fujimori T, Matsuo Y, Kashii M, Murase T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K. Sacroiliac joint motion in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Aug;23(2):209-16. doi: 10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14590. Epub 2015 May 15.
- Forsth P, Svedmark P, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Sanden B. Motion Analysis in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Feasibility Study of the 3DCT Technique Comparing Laminectomy Versus Bilateral Laminotomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Oct;31(8):E397-E402. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000677.
- Svedmark P, Berg S, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Weidenhielm L, Nemeth G, Olivecrona H. A New CT Method for Assessing 3D Movements in Lumbar Facet Joints and Vertebrae in Patients before and after TDR. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:260703. doi: 10.1155/2015/260703. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
- Svedmark P, Tullberg T, Noz ME, Maguire GQ Jr, Zeleznik MP, Weidenhielm L, Nemeth G, Olivecrona H. Three-dimensional movements of the lumbar spine facet joints and segmental movements: in vivo examinations of normal subjects with a new non-invasive method. Eur Spine J. 2012 Apr;21(4):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1988-y. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
- Eriksson T, Maguire GQ Jr, Noz ME, Zeleznik MP, Olivecrona H, Shalabi A, Hanni M. Are low-dose CT scans a satisfactory substitute for stereoradiographs for migration studies? A preclinical test of low-dose CT scanning protocols and their application in a pilot patient. Acta Radiol. 2019 Dec;60(12):1643-1652. doi: 10.1177/0284185119844166. Epub 2019 May 1. No abstract available.
- Kibsgard TJ, Rohrl SM, Roise O, Sturesson B, Stuge B. Movement of the sacroiliac joint during the Active Straight Leg Raise test in patients with long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2017 Aug;47:40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 29.
- Kibsgard TJ, Roise O, Stuge B, Rohrl SM. Precision and accuracy measurement of radiostereometric analysis applied to movement of the sacroiliac joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Nov;470(11):3187-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2413-5. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- IMSRA
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Sacroiliac Instability
-
Xtant MedicalRTI SurgicalRecruitingJoint Diseases | Musculoskeletal Diseases | Spinal Stenosis | Fusion of Spine | Spine | Spinal Fusion | Spinal Disease | Spinal Instability | Sacroiliac; Fusion | Fusion of Joint | SacroiliacUnited States, Spain, Germany
-
SI-BONE, Inc.RecruitingSacroiliac Joint Pain | Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction | Sacroiliac Disorder | Sacroiliac; FusionUnited States
-
Logan College of ChiropracticUnknownSacroiliac FunctionUnited States
-
University of BergenOslo University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University of AlbertaWithdrawnSacroiliac Joint Somatic DysfunctionCanada
-
Ochsner Health SystemGlobus Medical IncWithdrawnSacroiliac Joint Somatic Dysfunction | Sacroiliac; Spondylitis
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
SI-BONE, Inc.Active, not recruitingSacroiliac DysfunctionUnited States
-
William Beaumont Army Medical CenterUnknownLateral Ankle InstabilityUnited States
-
Hvidovre University HospitalRecruitingShoulder Instability Subluxation BilateralDenmark