Goal-directed Therapy in Neurosurgery.

May 3, 2022 updated by: Ondrej Hrdy, Brno University Hospital

Effect of Goal-directed Fluid Management Guided by Non-invasive Device on Incidence of Postoperative Complications in Neurosurgery: Pilot Study

The purpose of the study is to assess feasibility of future large randomised controled study aimed on assessment of effect of goal-directed therapy on incidence of complications in neurosurgery compared to standard care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Patients undergoing neurosurgical operations are at risk of inadequate intravascular volume for several reasons. The appropriate fluid management in neurosurgery is a challenge. Goal-directed therapy has been shown to improve the outcome of patients undergoing major surgery. Current knowledge regarding effect of fluid management on patient-orientated outcomes in neurosurgery is limited.

This study is designed as a pilot study with two parallel groups. Patients scheduled to planned brain surgery at the University Hospital Brno will be screened whether they meet the inclusion criteria. After obtaining informed consent, the patient will be randomized to one of the study arms.

In one arm (STANDARD) standard monitoring of vital signs will be introduced. During the operation, perioperative fluid therapy and administration of vasoactive agents will depend entirely at the discretion of the attending anaesthetist. Postoperative therapy will be fully controlled and will depend on the decision of the attending physician. In the second arm (GDT), a non-invasive hemodynamic monitor STARLINK™SV will be introduced in addition to standard monitoring. In this arm, basal infusion with crystalloid balanced solution will be initiated. Additional boluses of fluids will be administered based on haemodynamic monitoring. The primary outcome of the study is a proportion of patients with serious adverse event (SAE). Incidence of SAEs will be compared between study groups. SAE will be defined as unsatisfactory brain tissue relaxation at the end of operation and any intervention for brain oedema postoperatively.

The secondary outcome is to compare proportion of patients with postoperative complications in both groups and length of ICU and hospital stay.

This study will enroll 34 patients in total, 17 in each group. After completion of enrolment of patients the statistical analysis will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brno, Czechia, 625 00
        • University Hospital Brno

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age at least 18 years
  • anticipated duration of surgery at least 2 hours
  • signed written consent form
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification < 4.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unavailability of hemodynamic monitor
  • emergency operation
  • ASA ≥4
  • sitting operating position and awake craniotomy
  • awake craniotomy
  • serious cardiorespiratory disorder
  • cardiac arrythmia
  • obesity with BMI above 35 kg/m2

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: STANDARD
In this arm standard monitoring of vital signs will be used during operation.
Administration of fluids and vasoactive drugs guided by standard vital signs monitoring
Experimental: GDT
A non-invasive hemodynamic monitor STARLINK™SV will be used in addition to standard monitoring.
Administration of fluids and vasoactive drugs guided by non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serious Adverse Events 1
Time Frame: During the Surgery
Assessment of number of patients with serious adverse event (SAE). SAE is defined as unsatisfactory brain tissue relaxation at the end of surgery assessed by neurosurgeon. Level 3 or 4 of brain tissue relaxation will be considered as unsatisfactory (level 1 - completely relaxed, level 2 - satisfactorily relaxed, level 3 - firm, level 4 - bulging).
During the Surgery
Serious Adverse Events 2
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Assessment of number of patients with serious adverse event (SAE). SAE is defined as any intervention indicated for treatment of brain edema 24 hours after surgery.
24 hours postoperatively
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of eligible patients who consent to participate in the study.
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Completeness of Case Report Forms
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Proportion of enrolled patients with completed Case Report Form.
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of patients with pre-defined postoperative complication.
through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roman Gal, M.D., Ph.D., Masaryk University Brno and University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CT0012021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery--Complications

Clinical Trials on STANDARD

Subscribe