- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04756362
IN-HOspital Program to systematizE Chest Pain Protocol (IN-HOPE) (In-Hope)
Potential Impact in Clinical Practice of Early Exclusion Protocols for Acute Myocardial Infarction With High Sensitivity Troponin T in Different Scenarios (IN-HOspital Program to SystematizE Chest Pain Protocol-IN HOPE)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Chest pain is the main clinical complaint in emergency room visits and represents the most common symptom of Acute Myocardial Infarction, which is the main cause of death in Brazil and worldwide. Although most patients with chest pain do not have a final diagnosis of AMI, they remain under observation until the diagnosis of AMI is excluded. The most current strategy recommended for rapid AMI exclusion uses high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T at time zero and one hour later. However, some points that have not yet been properly evaluated in previous studies can be evaluated in the current study:
- Evaluation of the early exclusion protocol (0 -1 hour) in a Brazilian population
- Evaluation of the early exclusion protocol (0 -1 hour) in isolation and associated with traditional risk scores (TIMI, GRACE, HEART and EDACS)
- Systematic evaluation of the early exclusion protocol (0 -1 hour) in patients without chest pain but with a pre-defined condition of suspected AMI
- Evaluation of the prognostic value of an isolated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T < 5 ng/L in a diverse population.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Samaritano Paulista
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years of age
- The patient agrees and signs an informed consent form
One of the following 2 criteria:
- Acute chest pain (last episode of pain beginning <6 hours after inclusion) or
- Syncope, dyspnea or epigastric pain without an obvious cause at the initial assessment (last episode of one of these symptoms beginning <6 hours after inclusion) associated with at least one of the following factors: Age ≥ 65 years, history of arterial disease, history of diabetes mellitus.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Cardiac arrest or hypoxemia or hemodynamic instability or cardioversion during the first hour of assessment
- Thrombolytic therapy, primary angioplasty or other medical condition that requires hospitalization identified within one hour after the evaluation
- Dialysis patients
- Patients with trauma
- Myocardial revascularization or acute myocardial infarction in the last month
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women
- Patient unable to be followed for 30 days
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Prospective cohort
A minimum of 294 patients will be included in the evaluation of 0 and 1 hour protocol (prospective evaluation).
|
|
Retrospective cohort
A minimum of 1,000 patients will be included in the evaluation of prognostic value of high sensitive cardiac troponin < 5 ng/L(retrospective evaluation).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy of early rule out for myocardial infarction diagnosis
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Accuracy of the 0 and 1 hour algorithm using troponin for diagnosis of myocardial infarction compared to the gold standard with measurements every 3 hours
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy of early rule out for myocardial infarction according to type of symptoms
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Accuracy of the 0 and 1 hour algorithm using troponin for diagnosis of myocardial infarction compared to the gold standard with measurements every 3 hours with or without chest pain
|
30 days
|
|
Accuracy of early rule out for myocardial infarction according to chest pain score (TIMI)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Accuracy of the 0 and 1 hour algorithm using troponin for diagnosis of myocardial infarction compared to the gold standard with measurements every 3 hours according to chest pain score (TIMI).
TIMI score minimum 0 and maximum 7 points (higher scores mean a worse outcome).
|
30 days
|
|
Accuracy of early rule out for myocardial infarction according to chest pain score (EDACS)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Accuracy of the 0 and 1 hour algorithm using troponin for diagnosis of myocardial infarction compared to the gold standard with measurements every 3 hours according to chest pain score (EDACS).
EDACS score minimum -6 and maximum +20 points (higher scores mean a worse outcome).
|
30 days
|
|
Accuracy of early rule out for myocardial infarction according to chest pain score (GRACE)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Accuracy of the 0 and 1 hour algorithm using troponin for diagnosis of myocardial infarction compared to the gold standard with measurements every 3 hours according to chest pain score (GRACE).
GRACE score minimum 1 and maximum 372 points (higher scores mean a worse outcome).
|
30 days
|
|
Accuracy of early rule out for myocardial infarction according to chest pain score (HEART)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Accuracy of the 0 and 1 hour algorithm using troponin for diagnosis of myocardial infarction compared to the gold standard with measurements every 3 hours according to chest pain score (HEART).
HEART score minimum 0 and maximum 10 points (higher scores mean a worse outcome).
|
30 days
|
|
Evaluation of the prognostic value (death and myocardial infarction within 30 days) of an isolated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T < 5 ng/L in a diverse population.
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Evaluation of the prognostic value (death and myocardial infarction within 30 days) of an isolated high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T < 5 ng/L in a diverse population (retrospective cohort).
|
30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 001/20
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chest Pain
-
Clinical Locomotion ScienceOdense University Hospital; University of Southern Denmark; The County of Funen... and other collaboratorsCompletedUndiagnosed Chest Pain | Musculoskeletal Chest Pain | Non-cardiac Chest PainDenmark
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...TerminatedFunctional Chest PainNetherlands
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaCompletedNon Cardiac Chest PainMalaysia
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterCompletedNoncardiac Chest Pain (NCCP)United States
-
Ataturk UniversityCompletedPain, Acute | Pain, ChestTurkey
-
Queen's UniversityCompletedChest Pain Atypical SyndromeCanada
-
Ataturk UniversityCompletedPain, Acute | Pain, ChestTurkey
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruitingNonspecific Cardiac Chest PainEgypt
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityWithdrawnPain, Postoperative | Pain, ChestUnited States
-
The Affiliated Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing...Yichang Humanwell Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., ChinaRecruiting