The Impact of Covid-19 on Skeletal Muscle

May 30, 2023 updated by: University of Nottingham

Investigating the Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Skeletal Muscle

With the recent worldwide outbreak of the COVID-19 infection and the huge impact it has had upon lives in the UK, it is key to increase knowledge on the impact of the virus on the body. Certain aspects of the virus' characteristics are also poorly understood: The reason behind the variation in response between individuals, and the long-term impacts of infection upon the body. It is already known from previous research that muscle-health plays an important role in health, with other illnesses known to have an impact upon muscle health. A large number of studies have investigated the relationship between muscle and health, with an increasing focus upon the impact upon the mitochondria within the muscle cells. Mitochondria are the energy-producing component of a cell and are vital not just for the muscle-cells but for the body as a whole.

The researchers hope that by investigating the impact of COVID-19 infection upon human skeletal muscle, the question of why individuals have different responses to the infection and the mechanism of the longer-term impact of infection can be answered. This added knowledge will then, hopefully, be able to guide therapy targets in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide, there have been over 50,000 deaths and over 1million infections in the UK alone. It has been widely reported that infection with COVID-19 leads to large variation between individuals, a large number appear asymptomatic or mild flu-like symptoms compared to a percentage requiring intensive care support and for some, the infection is ultimately fatal. The reason behind this variation is not yet fully understood.

With COVID-19 likely to have a lasting impact within the UK and on the NHS, any research that improves our knowledge upon the effect of the infection has the possibility to improve therapy targets and hopefully improve patient outcomes.

With how novel the COVID-19 pathogen is, little is currently known about the potential long-term impacts of infection upon individuals. There are currently many reports of longer-term syndromes following infection with COVID-19 including loss of smell and myalgia. The researchers hope that investigating the impact upon patients over the 12-months following their infection will gather information on the long-term impacts and potentially find evidence of the reason for these longer-term symptoms.

With skeletal muscle being one of the largest components of the human body, any impact upon its function is likely to have a significant impact upon an individual. With it being vital for not only locomotion but also in energy production for the body. The researchers hypothesize that changes within the skeletal muscle may account for some of the impacts of COVID-19 infection. The investigators hope that by investigating changes in muscle structure, muscle mitochondrial function, and neurological supply to the muscle they can identify a future therapy target to improve outcomes from COVID-19 infection.

To investigate this, this study plans to recruit participants with confirmed COVID-19 infection requiring varying levels of oxygen support (Oxygen therapy only n=12, Non-invasive ventilation n=12) and a control group of non-covid community-acquired pneumonia requiring oxygen therapy (n=12).

All groups will undergo the same investigations, and no interventions will form part of the study. Investigations will be carried out at 24-72hours of acute hospital admission, with follow-up assessments at 6-months and 12-months post-discharge.

The assessments performed will include: muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis muscle, an ultrasound scan of the vastus lateralis muscle, voluntary and stimulated iEMG of VL, and hand-grip strength analysis.

Study Type

Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Derbyshire
      • Derby, Derbyshire, United Kingdom, DE223NE
        • Royal Derby Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Population of individuals being treated for COVID-19 infection with a minimum of oxygen therapy.

Control population of individuals being treated for non-COVID-19 community acquired pneumonia requiring oxygen therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed COVID-19 infection as confirmed by PCR swab, or being treated for non-COVID-19 community acquired pneumonia
  • A minimum of oxygen treatment required for 24hours.
  • Capacity to give informed and written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A BMI <16.5 or >35 kg/m2
  • Active cardiovascular disease:

Significant arrhythmia

Recent acute coronary event

  • Cerebrovascular disease:

Recent stroke

  • Respiratory disease including:

Pulmonary hypertension

Significant COPD

Uncontrolled asthma

  • Clotting dysfunction or current use of anticoagulants (eg Warfarin/Clopidogrel/ Rivaroxaban)
  • Significant musculoskeletal or neurological disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Control Group

Non-Covid -19 associated community acquired pneumonia with oxygen therapy required.

n=12

No intervention will be used
Oxygen Therapy

Confirmed COVID-19 infection via PCR swab, with a new oxygen therapy requirement. NB the researchers will not be involved in the clinical decision of if the participant requires oxygen, this will be the clinical-teams decision.

n=12

No intervention will be used
Non-Invasive ventilation therapy

Confirmed COVID-19 infection via PCR Swab, with a clinical need for non-invasive ventilation.

NB the researchers will not be involved in the clinical decision if the participant requires non-invasive ventilation, this will be the clinical-teams decision.

n=12

No intervention will be used

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in mitochondrial function between COVID-19 infection and control group
Time Frame: This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up

Assessment of skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation rate between COVID-19 associated illness and Control group (non-covid community-acquired pneumonia).

This will be assessed by measuring oxygen consumption using a high-resolution respirometer and expressed as a ratio of maximal rate.

This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
The difference in mitochondrial function between levels of ventilation support required in COVID-19 patients
Time Frame: each of the 3 time points assessed: the acute admission, as well as in the recovery phases - 6 month and 12 month follow up
Assessment of skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation rate assessed using high-resolution respirometer between the 2 groups of ventilatory support in COVID-19 patients (Oxygen only support, non-invasive ventilation). Expressed as a ratio of maximal oxygen consumption.
each of the 3 time points assessed: the acute admission, as well as in the recovery phases - 6 month and 12 month follow up
The changes in mitochondrial function during the recovery period from COVID-19
Time Frame: Comparison over the 3 time periods: acute admission, 6month and 12 month follow up
Assessment of skeletal muscle mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation rate using high-resolution respirometer expressed as a percentage change over the time period in each group
Comparison over the 3 time periods: acute admission, 6month and 12 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in muscle macroscopic structure between the groups
Time Frame: This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up

Ultrasound will allow the research group to provide an estimate of vastus lateralis size (mm3).

This will be compared between the 3 groups.

This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
The difference in muscle macroscopic structure between the groups
Time Frame: This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Ultrasound will allow the research group to provide an estimate of fascicle length (mm) between the 3 groups.
This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
The difference in muscle macroscopic structure between the groups
Time Frame: This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Ultrasound will allow the research group to provide an estimate of fascicle angle (degrees) between the 3 groups.
This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Difference in the neurological supply of skeletal muscle
Time Frame: This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Measuring iEMG activity from voluntary and involuntary contractions will allow a detailed examination of the nerve-muscle relationship assessed by nerve firing rate (hz)
This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Difference in the neurological supply of skeletal muscle
Time Frame: This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Measuring iEMG activity from voluntary and involuntary contractions will allow a detailed examination of the nerve-muscle relationship encompassing the neuromuscular junction transmission stability (assessed using MUP (uv.ms)
This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Difference in the neurological supply of skeletal muscle
Time Frame: This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Measuring iEMG activity from voluntary and involuntary contractions will allow a detailed examination of the nerve-muscle relationship allowing us to assess nerve conduction time (ms)
This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
Difference in muscle function
Time Frame: This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up
This will be analysed according to handgrip strength performance (measured in kg)
This will be assessed in each of the 3 time points: the acute admission assessment, as well as in the recovery period of 6-month and 12-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Beth Phillips, BSc PhD, University of Nottingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on No intervetion will be used

Subscribe