Immunochromatography Versus Microscopy for Diagnosis of Entamoeba Histolytica/Dispar Infection.

October 9, 2021 updated by: Khoulood Zakaria Hashem, Sohag University

Immunochromatography Versus Microscopy for Diagnosis of Entamoeba Histolytica/Dispar Infection in Sohag.

Amoebiasis, an infection by the protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica is globally considered as the third leading parasitic cause of human mortality besides malaria and schistosomiasis. It is estimated that E. histolytica may infect half a billion people annually. Moreover, it was estimated that 100,000 patients per year died due to the clinical complications of the disease. Laboratory diagnosis of E. histolytica/dispar is usually achieved by microscopic detection of trophozoites or cysts in stool samples. Microscopy is time consuming and requires an experienced observer to identify the organism. Furthermore, it must be performed on three stool samples to increase sensitivity leading to decreased patient compliance and delay in the final diagnosis. Therefore, a few the commercially available copro-antigen assay have been developed for E. histolytica/dispar diagnosis including the enzyme immunoassay and non-enzymatic immunochromatographic (ICT) assays that do not depend on microscopy skills and increase laboratory efficiency by reducing time and cost.

The aim of the study is:

  1. to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available rapid immunochromatographic Copro-antigen assay (RIDA® QUICK Entamoeba) in comparison with conventional microscopic examination for the diagnosis of E. histolytica /dispar infection.
  2. to estimate the prevalence of E. histolytica /dispar infection in outpatients in Sohag.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

samples will be collected from outpatients complaining of dysentery or diarrhea with any age & sex groups from different locations (cities and village).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients complaining of dysentery or diarrhea with any age & sex groups.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients taking amoebicidal drugs.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
evaluate the efficacy of immunochromatographic Copro-antigen assay for diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica/ dispar.
Time Frame: 16 weeks following the startpoint of the study.
comparing the sensitivity and specifity with conventional microscopy for diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica/ dispar infection.
16 weeks following the startpoint of the study.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
detect the prevelance of Entamoeba histolytica/ dispar in Sohag.
Time Frame: 16 weeks following the startpoint of the study.
By examining stool samples from 100 patients, the number of cases with Entamoena histolytica/dispar infection is recorded.
16 weeks following the startpoint of the study.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 14, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Soh-Med-21-02-16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dysentery Amebic

3
Subscribe