HEAVEN Criteria: Prediction of Difficult Airway for In- Hospital Emergency Airway Management

September 12, 2024 updated by: Thomas Riva

HEAVEN Criteria: a Monocentric Prospective Observational Study to Validate the Prediction of Difficult Airway for In-Hospital Emergency Airway Management

The HEAVEN criteria were found valid to predict difficult airways during preclinical emergency intubations in a retrospective study. The acronym stands for Hypoxemia, Extremes of size, Anatomic abnormalities, Vomit/blood/fluid, Exsanguination/anaemia, and Neck mobility issues. This is a monocentric prospective observational study to assess the validity of the HEAVEN criteria in the in-hospital setting at a level I adult and pediatric emergency university-based hospital.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Emergency intubations are prone to present a difficult airway. A difficult airway can lead to prolonged intubation time and to hypoxemia in situations where oxygenation is not possible that can finally result in hypoxic cardiac arrest and irreversible brain damage caused by hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

Tools to predict difficult airways are rather poor concerning specificity and sensitivity. A score to predict difficult airway developed in the pre-clinical setting are the HEAVEN criteria. The acronym HEAVEN stands for: Hypoxemia, Extremes of size, Anatomic abnormalities, Vomit/blood/fluid, Exsanguination/anaemia, and Neck mobility issues and does not need patients' cooperation. It has been recently validated in the pre-clinical emergency setting and was found to be useful.

The study aim is to evaluate if the HEAVEN criteria are suitable to be used to predict difficult airway in in-hospital emergency intubation to finally increase patients' safety during rapid sequence induction (RSI).

This prospective observational single-centre study in emergency intubation will consecutively recruit all patients of all ages who need RSI due to their medical condition performed by the staff of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine at the Bern University Hospital. We will record data that are gathered during routine patient care and stored primarily in the departmental anaesthesia information systems.

The primary objective is to validate if the HEAVEN criteria, an existing prehospital difficult airway prediction tool, is able to predict airways difficulties during RSI in the clinical in-hospital setting. The secondary objective is, to assess the subcomponent of the HEAVEN criteria and if differences and adaptations are needed comparing it to the prehospital setting.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2800

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • University Hospital Bern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who need rapid sequence intubation due to their medical condition at the Bern University Hospital are screened if they fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All consecutive patients of all ages who need an in-hospital rapid sequence intubation (RSI) performed by the staff of the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Given general consent or delayed obtained general consent after the procedure
  • English, German or French speaking patients

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients without informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients that need emergency rapid sequence inductions

Patients of all ages who need emergency rapid sequence inductions due to their medical condition performed by the staff of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine at the Bern University Hospital.

We defined "emergency" as a non scheduled intervention with immediate (or maximum up to 6 hours after announcement) need of general anaesthesia (e.g. trauma patients with need for emergency surgery) and therefore appropriate fastening is not possible.

Rapid sequence induction starts with the administration of rapid acting intravenous narcotics, opioids and neuromuscular blockage and avoids whenever possible positive-pressure ventilation after induction of anesthesia.
Patients that need scheduled rapid sequence inductions

Patients of all ages who need scheduled rapid sequence inductions due to their medical condition performed by the staff of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine at the Bern University Hospital.

Patients of this cohort have a scheduled intervention and therefore can fasten meals for at least 6 hours before induction of general anaesthesia.

Rapid sequence induction starts with the administration of rapid acting intravenous narcotics, opioids and neuromuscular blockage and avoids whenever possible positive-pressure ventilation after induction of anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients with first-attempt success rate of RSI
Time Frame: 1 hour
Every attempt starts with the insertion of a laryngoscope blade over the lips and ends with a blocked tube in the trachea and measuring of carbon dioxide (CO2)
1 hour
Patients with difficulty of intubation
Time Frame: 1 hour
Rated on a scale by the airway manager: easy, difficult, not possible
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall success rate of rapid sequence induction (RSI)
Time Frame: 1 hour
All RSI during the study period are analyzed for success (If intubation is possible or not)
1 hour
Patients with first-attempt success without desaturation SpO2 <92% during RSI
Time Frame: 1 hour
Saturation will be measured and recorded during the whole intervention and analyzed for the time of the RSI.
1 hour
Total attempts of intubation in a patient
Time Frame: 1 hour
Every attempt starts with the insertion of a laryngoscope blade over the lips and ends with a blocked tube in the trachea and measuring of CO2
1 hour
Cormack & Lehane grade (C&L) or Percentage of Glottis Opening (POGO) in a patient
Time Frame: 1 hour
C&L for direct laryngoscopy or POGO for video laryngoscopy will be recorded for every intubation
1 hour
Lowest and highest recorded value of patients' heart rate (HR) during RSI
Time Frame: 1 hour
Heart rate will be measured and recorded during the whole intervention and analyzed for the time of the RSI.
1 hour
Lowest and highest recorded value of patients' blood-pressure (BP) during RSI
Time Frame: 1 hour
BP will be measured and recorded during the whole intervention and analyzed for the time of the RSI.
1 hour
Lowest and highest recorded value of patients' oxygen saturation (SpO2) during RSI
Time Frame: 1 hour
SpO2 will be measured and recorded during the whole intervention and analyzed for the time of the RSI.
1 hour
Patients with use of vasoconstrictors during RSI
Time Frame: 1 hour
Use of vasoconstrictors will be recorded during the whole intervention and analyzed for the time of the RSI.
1 hour
Patients with use of devices/ techniques for intubation
Time Frame: 1 hour

Use of:

  • supraglottic airway device (SAD)
  • intubation guides (Frova, S-Guide)
  • video laryngoscopy (VL) or direct laryngoscopy, shape and size of the blade, flexible scope
  • rigid stylets ("C-MAC VS", "Bonfils")
  • intubation over SAD
  • emergency front of neck access (eFONA)
1 hour
Patients with use and type of neuromuscular blockage agent
Time Frame: 1 hour
Yes / No, if Yes, specify: Succinylcholine, Rocuronium, Atracurium, other
1 hour
Patient's demographics
Time Frame: 1 hour
Patient's age, gender, weight and size
1 hour
Type of planned procedure
Time Frame: 1 day
type of surgery by discipline (e.g. ear, nose and throat (ENT), visceral, orthopedic, heart, urology, gynecology) and specification (e.g. appendectomy)
1 day
Place of intubation
Time Frame: 1 day
The place where the intubation is performed. Either operation room (OR) or outside OR
1 day
Time of intubation
Time Frame: 1 hour
the exact time (HH:MM:SS) in central european time of the induction of the RSI
1 hour
Level of airway manager
Time Frame: 1 hour
nurse, resident or attending anaesthesiologist
1 hour
Endotracheal tube (ETT)
Time Frame: 1 hour
Type and size of the used ETT(s) during the RSI attempt(s)
1 hour
Patients with airway-related injuries like blood, damage to tissue, lips or teeth caused directly during intubation
Time Frame: 1 hour
Will be directly recorded if occurred during the RSI by the airway manager or team
1 hour
Patients with airway-related complains like hoarseness or problems with swallowing until 24 hours after intubation reported subjectively by the patient
Time Frame: 1 day
All patients will be visited in the first 24 hours after anaesthesia if they report subjectively airway-related complains like hoarseness or problems with swallowing until 24 hours after intubation and evaluated by an anaesthesiologist or further referred to an ENT specialist
1 day
Patients with suspicion of aspiration during RSI
Time Frame: 1 day
Newly recorded suspicion of aspiration during intubation will be recorded by the airway team
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Robert Greif, MD, Prof., Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Rapid sequence induction

Subscribe