Randomized Clinical Trial of a Multi-Modal Palliative Care Intervention

April 10, 2024 updated by: Joanna Arch, University of Colorado, Boulder

Adults diagnosed with metastatic cancer commonly experience depression and anxiety symptoms, which can interfere with advance care planning. This randomized clinical trial evaluates a novel, piloted, primary palliative care intervention that addresses advance care planning and psychosocial needs of patients with metastatic cancer. The intervention focuses on patients with elevated anxiety and depression (anx/dep) symptoms-those with highest psychosocial needs who may be at greatest risk for advance care planning non-completion. The intervention is founded on an evidence-based intervention approach known as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) that reduces distress and promotes behavior change through theory-driven mechanisms. In the proposed randomized trial, M-ACT will be compared to a usual care control condition. The study will also assess the association between advance care planning and anx/dep symptoms, thereby informing the critical practice question of whether anx/dep symptoms should be addressed concurrently with advance care planning. The study will enroll patients with Stage IV solid tumor cancer (N=240) within Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, randomized 1:1 to M-ACT or usual care. The study aims to: 1) Evaluate the hypothesis that M-ACT will increase advance care planning completion (primary outcome) and sense of life meaning, and reduce anx/dep symptoms and fear of dying relative to usual care control. 2) Assess the association between anx/dep symptoms and advance care planning at baseline and over time, testing the hypothesis that decreases in anx/dep symptoms at post- intervention will be associated with increases in advance care planning at follow-up. 3) Assess M-ACT's hypothesized mechanisms to specify how the intervention works (exploratory aim). Given their advance care planning and psychosocial needs, and poor access to palliative care, rigorously investigating M-ACT has the potential to benefit community patients with metastatic cancer and to advance palliative care science by addressing gaps in novel approaches, foundational knowledge, and the scalable delivery of palliative care.

Note: Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the in-person group component of M-ACT has currently been shifted to an online group format.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will evaluate an innovative, multi-modal palliative care intervention that addresses the lack of advance care planning (ACP) and unmet psychosocial needs commonly experienced by patients with metastatic cancer. Up to half of adults with metastatic cancer report elevated anxiety or depression symptoms, which can cause withdrawal from daily activities and future planning and have been linked to non-adherent health behaviors in other disease populations. However, little is known about the extent to which anxiety or depression influence ACP completion in palliative care. In addition, metastatic cancer triggers patients' fear of dying and threatens their sense of meaning. The current approach aims to optimize two core palliative care outcomes - ACP and psychosocial well being - in outpatient oncology settings and to build the evidence base for primary palliative care interventions. This new multimodal intervention, which is based on extensive pilot data, uses a primary palliative care approach and focuses on patients with elevated anxiety or depression (anx/dep) symptoms.

The intervention is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), an evidence-based approach to reduce distress and promote behavior change through theorized mechanisms that include cultivating acceptance of internal experience and aligning behavior with personal values. A pilot study for adults with metastatic cancer and elevated anx/dep symptoms conducted by the current research team, leveraged ACT to design and refine the multi-modal ACT intervention (M-ACT) in response to patient and provider feedback. M-ACT helps metastatic cancer patients to live meaningfully and face the future no matter what their health status, supports their engagement in ACP and addresses their psychosocial needs.

To facilitate future scalability, M-ACT uses a novel multi-modal delivery structure comprising both in-person group sessions led by existing on-site clinical social workers and self-paced, personalized online sessions completed at home, which efficiently increase intervention dose without increasing patient travel or provider demands. The current randomized controlled trial will rigorously evaluate the ability of M-ACT to increase ACP (primary outcome) and improve psychosocial outcomes (secondary). This study also will evaluate the relationship between anx/dep symptoms and ACP to inform the critical clinical question of whether anx/dep symptoms should be addressed concurrently with ACP. Finally, the study will explore mechanisms that may explain how M-ACT influences ACP and the targeted secondary outcomes.

The study will enroll patients with stage IV solid tumor cancer (N = 240), randomized in a 1:1 ratio to M-ACT or usual care for a 4-week intervention period. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, mid-intervention (to assess mechanisms), 1-week post-intervention, and 2-month follow-up.

Note: Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the in-person group component of M-ACT has currently been shifted to an online group format.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least 18 years of age
  2. English-speaking (able to speak, read, and write well in English)
  3. Diagnosed with Stage IV metastatic cancer of any solid tumor type
  4. Capable at time of consent of understanding and voluntarily consenting themselves to the study, attending group sessions, and completing the online sessions at home, confirmed by an Eastern Cooperative Group Performance Status Scale of 0 to 2
  5. Endorse moderate to severe anxiety or depression symptoms on the Patient Health Questionnaire-4

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current high suicide risk
  2. Psychiatric hospitalization or suicide attempt in the past 5 years
  3. History of chronic, untreated trauma unrelated to their cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multi-Modal Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (M-ACT)
M-ACT consists of five 2-hour group sessions (plus booster) that alternate with self-paced online modules and check-ins that participants complete on their own, between the group sessions. The intervention addresses distress associated with coping with metastatic cancer and supports engagement in advance care planning. The intervention is based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, an intervention model that aims to help people cope with life challenges and difficult thoughts/feelings in a manner that helps them to live fuller and more meaningful lives.
An innovative muli-modal palliative care intervention that addresses the lack of advance care planning and unmet psychosocial needs commonly experienced by patients with metastatic cancer.
Other: Control: Usual Care
Patients in the control arm will have access to usual care (UC) at the collaborating clinics, consisting of access to a clinical social worker and nurse practitioners for advance care planning and supportive visits at patient request. After completion of study procedures, including FU, the UC participants will be offered M-ACT free of cost.
The control condition includes usual care (UC) at the collaborating clinics, consisting of access to a clinical social worker and nurse practitioners for advance care planning and supportive visits at patient request.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in advance care planning
Time Frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
The primary outcome is defined as change in the number of steps taken toward ACP completion from baseline through 2-month follow-up. ACP steps will be assessed with a checklist adapted from the M-ACT pilot study by consulting the Hospice & Palliative Nurses Association online ACP resources and the study team, and refined by soliciting pilot participants' feedback on item clarity. The checklist describes each ACP step and asks patients to indicate steps taken to date.
Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported depression symptom questionnaire. Higher scores = more depression symptoms
Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Time Frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported anxiety symptom questionnaire. Higher scores = more anxiety symptoms
Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
The Death Attitude Profile - Revised, Fear of Death and Death Avoidance Scales
Time Frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported fear of death and dying questionnaire. Higher scores = greater fear of death and dying
Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), Meaning/Peace Subscale
Time Frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported sense of life meaning and peace. Higher scores = greater sense of meaning/peace
Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention Acceptability: Session Feedback Questionnaire
Time Frame: At the end of each session during the 5-week intervention period, plus after the booster session 1 month later
Participant value of the session will be assessed through the Session Feedback. Higher scores = higher value and acceptability of the session
At the end of each session during the 5-week intervention period, plus after the booster session 1 month later
Intervention Acceptability: Group session attendance and online session completion
Time Frame: From the start to end of the 5-week intervention plus the booster session held 1 month later
Intervention engagement will be assessed via attendance in group sessions and completion of the online modules and check-ins
From the start to end of the 5-week intervention plus the booster session held 1 month later
Intervention Acceptability: Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8
Time Frame: Assessed two times: within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Participant satisfaction will be measured using the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (adapted to the current intervention) with higher scores indicating more satisfaction
Assessed two times: within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Process measure: Multidimensional Experiential Avoidance Scale: Denial and Distress Aversion scales
Time Frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported experiential avoidance with higher scores indicating greater avoidance.
Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Process Measure: Experiences Questionnaire-Decentering Scale
Time Frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported defusion/decentering with higher scores indicating greater defusion/decentering.
Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Process Measure: Valuing Questionnaire
Time Frame: Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)
Patient-reported values-aligned behavior with higher scores indicating more aligned behavior
Assessed four times with parallel timing in the control group: prior to the intervention (Pre), week 3 of the intervention (Mid), within one week after the end of the weekly intervention (Post), at 2-month follow-up (FU)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joanna J Arch, PHD, University of Colorado, Boulder

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-0787
  • R01NR018479 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Metastatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Multi-Modal Palliative Care Intervention

3
Subscribe