Effectiveness and Acceptability of a Digital Solution to Train Specific EEG Frequencies With Neurofeedback for Improving Sleep (CONNECTOSOM)

January 2, 2024 updated by: AdministrateurDRC
The management of insomnia includes, as a first step, a healthy lifestyle, including physical activity at appropriate times, nutritional monitoring, reduced consumption of stimulants, bedtime and wake-up times that do not vary between weekdays and weekends, banning screens at least two hours before bedtime, etc. If all these conditions are met and insomnia persists, additionnal therapies may be offered. URGOTECH has developed a connected headband allowing to practice neurofeedback in complete autonomy in subjects reporting dissatisfaction with the quality of their sleep.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Among the parameters of brain activity used in neurofeedback, the most frequently used EEG activity is training to strengthen sensorimotor rhythms (SMR). This training could make it possible to reduce cortical hyperstimulation associated with certain sleep disorders. Our hypothesis is that the application of such a neurofeedback technique in an ecological situation at home will improve the subjective quality of their sleep.

The subject must perform, at home, at least 3 sessions per week with the URGOnight solution for about 4 months. Since regularity is important in order to observe effects, subjects are followed up by smartphone application at least 3 times over the training period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33000
        • Pellegrin University Hospital
      • Grenoble, France, 38000
        • Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Lille University Hospital
      • Paris, France, 75004
        • Hôpital Hôtel-Dieu - APHP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Insomnia according to DSM V criteria (sleep latency greater than or equal to 30 minutes, night-time waking time greater than 30 minutes and early awakening for at least 1 month)
  • ISI score greater than or equal to 15
  • Head circumference: 52-62 cm
  • Subjects not suffering from a characterized depressive episode and/or severe anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with Depression score<11 and Anxiety score<11)
  • Having a smartphone (Android 5 or iOS 11), an internet connection and able to use it
  • Able to give free, informed and written consent
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of a social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Organic Sleep Disorders: Sleep Apnea Syndrome, Restless Legs, Narcolepsy, Hypersomnia, Kleine-Levin, Sleep Related Eating Syndrome and Nocturnal Bulimia
  • Acute or chronic pathologies incompatible with the study follow-up according to the investigator's assessment (severe psychiatric disorders by MMSE interview, acute pain and acute pain acutization)
  • Antidepressants and/or hypnotics whose dosage was changed within 3 months prior to inclusion
  • Epilepsy
  • Sleep-disturbing environment (noise, newborns, etc.)
  • Shift work
  • Time difference travel from at least 3 zones more than once a month during the study period
  • BMI>30
  • Drug use in the 3 months prior to inclusion (including caffeine addiction at investigator's discretion)
  • Weekly alcohol consumption of more than 21 glasses for a man and 14 for a woman (without exceeding 4 glasses per day and with at least one alcohol-free evening during the week)
  • Use of alcohol to sleep
  • Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women / Subject deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision / Persons under guardianship or curatorship or adults protected by law according to articles L1121-5 to L1121-8
  • Subjects not affiliated with social security
  • Subject with psychological and/or linguistic incapacity to understand and follow the constraints of the study
  • Participation in another interventional clinical study where the intervention may have an impact on the objective and primary endpoint during the 4 weeks prior to the start of the study.
  • A person who has participated in another research study with an exclusion period still in progress at the time of inclusion.
  • Subject who would receive more than 4500 euros in compensation for participation in other biomedical research in the 12 months prior to this study
  • Subject cannot be contacted in case of emergency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: URGOnight
Use of the URGOnight neurofeedback training headband and its associated application

URGOnight is a daytime brain training solution (CE marked) aim at improve the quality of sleep. The device consists of an electroencephalographic (EEG) measuring strip connected to a mobile application. The latter is available free of charge on Android and iOS in various mobile application stores (Google Play Store and App Store).

URGOnight is a wireless device, it connects via Bluetooth® Low Energy (BLE) to the URGOnight mobile application running on a smartphone. The EEG data is broadcast via a BLE protocol, and the standard Bluetooth® operating distance has a range of 10 meters.

To use the URGOnight solution, the user must authorize the application to access his phone's memory to store his usage data and must also authorize the geolocation of his phone to enable BLE connection. This data is not recorded but is necessary for the proper functioning of the solution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of the URGOnight device on the severity of insomnia
Time Frame: Change from Baseline ISI score at 4 months of treatment
Assessed by the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) score
Change from Baseline ISI score at 4 months of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to therapy
Time Frame: During the 4 months of treatment
Average frequency of use greater than or equal to 12 sessions per month and the number of training interruptions of more than 7 days less than 2, combined to report adherence to therapy
During the 4 months of treatment
Acceptability assessed through the motivation of the subject
Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 100)
Motivation to do the exercises evaluated by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visit 3 (Day 100)
Ease of use perceived by the user
Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 100)
Evaluation by a satisfaction questionnaire: comfort, aesthetics, practicality, ...
Visit 3 (Day 100)
Learning to control the neurofeedback task
Time Frame: Up to 4 months of treatment
Measurement of the amplitude in µV² of SMR activity in baseline and during exercises
Up to 4 months of treatment
Performance during neurofeedback exercises
Time Frame: Up to 4 months of treatment
Progression of URGOnight neurofeedback training scores calculated by the application
Up to 4 months of treatment
Effect of the URGOnight device on subjective sleep efficiency (WASO)
Time Frame: V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114)
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) determined by sleep diary
V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114)
Effect of the URGOnight device on subjective sleep efficiency (SOL)
Time Frame: V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114)
Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) determined by sleep diary
V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114)
Effect of the URGOnight device on subjective sleep efficiency (TST)
Time Frame: V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114)
Total Sleep Time (TST) determined by sleep diary
V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114)
Effect of the URGOnight device on subjective sleep efficiency (SE)
Time Frame: V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114)
Sleep efficiency (SE) determined by sleep diary
V0 (Day 0), V2 (Day 65) and V4 (Day 114)
Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (WASO)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) determined by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (SOL)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Sleep Onset Latency (SOL) determined by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (TST)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Total Sleep Time (TST) determined by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (SE)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Sleep efficiency (SE) determined by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on objective sleep efficiency (Sleep fragmentation index)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Sleep fragmentation index determined by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Increase in sleep satisfaction
Time Frame: Up to 4 months of treatment
Sleep questionnaire in the application (overall score)
Up to 4 months of treatment
Progression of the sleep hygiene
Time Frame: Up to 4 months of treatment
Sleep hygiene questionnaire in the application (overall score)
Up to 4 months of treatment
Effect of the URGOnight device on quality of life (Daytime sleepiness)
Time Frame: V0 (Day 0) and V5 (Day 116)
Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire
V0 (Day 0) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on quality of life (Overall perceived improvement)
Time Frame: Visit 5 (Day 116)
Patient global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire
Visit 5 (Day 116)
Maintaining of sleep improvement
Time Frame: V6 (6-month follow-up visit) and V7 (9-month follow-up visit)
Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) questionnaire
V6 (6-month follow-up visit) and V7 (9-month follow-up visit)
Effect of the URGOnight device on sleep and wakefulness physiology (resting EEG)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Resting electroencephalographic (EEG) test (10-20 min)
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on sleep physiology (density of sleep zones)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Density of sleep zones by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on sleep physiology (amplitude of sleep zones)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Amplitude of sleep zones by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on sleep physiology (time spent in each sleep stages)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Percentage of time spent in each sleep stage determined by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the URGOnight device on wakefulness physiology (time spent in each sleep stages)
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Percentage of time spent in each sleep stage determined by polysomnography
V1 (Day 2) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the device on memory
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2), V2 (Day 65) and V5 (Day 116)
McNair Self-Questionnaire
V1 (Day 2), V2 (Day 65) and V5 (Day 116)
Effect of the device on anxiety
Time Frame: V1 (Day 2), V2 (Day 65) and V5 (Day 116)
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Y-A Form (STAI-YA)
V1 (Day 2), V2 (Day 65) and V5 (Day 116)
Device safety
Time Frame: Through study completion (an average of 10 months)
Collection of Adverse Events
Through study completion (an average of 10 months)
Strategies used to get the exercises done
Time Frame: Up to 4 months of treatment
Collection of the strategy employed (in the application)
Up to 4 months of treatment
Sub-group analysis of all judging criteria based on chronotype
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Day 2)
HORNE and OBSERG Circadian Typology Questionnaire
Visit 1 (Day 2)
Sub-group analysis of all judging criteria based on level of control over technology
Time Frame: Visit 1 (Day 2)
KUT (One-Dimensional Target Neutral) Locus of Control Questionnaire
Visit 1 (Day 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 38RC19.202
  • 2020-A02600-39 (Other Identifier: ID/RCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Disorder

Clinical Trials on URGOnight

Subscribe