- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04783285
Effect of Individual Cognitive Stimulation at Home in Adults With Psychotic Disorders
Effect of Individual Cognitive Stimulation at Home in Adults With Psychotic Disorders: Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Epidemiological studies indicate that Portugal has one of the highest prevalence rates of mental disorders in Europe. In 2016, one in five Portuguese suffered from a psychiatric illness and the network of Integrated Continuous Care in mental health is small, which is a major constraint to rehabilitation and support responses for people with mental health problems.
It is important to include psychologists and neuropsychologists in multidisciplinary teams, in actions related to mental health promotion and mental illness prevention programs, so that they can provide more comprehensive interventions for other effects of chronic mental health conditions, such as cognitive decline.
There is evidence linking psychotic disorders to impairments in functioning in most cognitive domains, including memory, executive functions, and attention, and that cognitive ageing in some areas may be accelerated in individuals with psychotic disorders. Thus, it is important to focus interventions on cognitive functioning in patients with psychosis, even after acute psychotic symptoms have improved. Executive functions appear to be of particular importance in the context of mental health problems, as they appear to be particularly integral for psychosocial functioning and the completion of instrumental activities of daily living. There is evidence that CS interventions in individual format are associated with greater effectiveness.
Many studies have supported the effectiveness and accessibility of home-based interventions in people with chronic mental illness. Yet, there are few published studies on continuous intervention in people with chronic mental illness and even more limited knowledge of how cognitive stimulation can help chronic mental health patients, including those with psychosis, to function.
One Portuguese study about the effect of an individual CS program in a home setting on cognitive and mood functioning in adults with psychotic disorders was tested, showed encouraging results and presented in detail an intervention protocol. However, it also presents some important limitations (e.g., convenience sample, lack of follow-up evaluation).
This study aims to overcome those limitations, through a randomised controlled trial, and, in addition to testing the effect of the CS program on global cognition, it also aims to assess its effect on emotional state, daily functioning, and quality of life.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Aveiro
-
Albergaria-a-Velha, Aveiro, Portugal, 3850-705
- Cediara - Social Solidarity Association of Ribeira de Fráguas
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults under 65 years.
- Diagnosed with of schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders according to the criteria of DSM-5 (APA, 2013), determined by a professional clinician.
- Willing to participate in all intervention and assessment sessions.
- Provided informed consent.
- Native speakers of Portuguese.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presentation of a condition requiring immediate intervention (e.g., suicidal thoughts).
- Severe sensory and physical limitations that prevent participation in the sessions.
- Severe disconnection with the environment and very limited attentional level.
- Inability to communicate adequately.
- Psychoactive substance use.
- Currently participating in another study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention Group
Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to the intervention group receiving CS or to a control group receiving treatment as usual.
Participants in the intervention group will participate in two CS sessions per week for 16 weeks besides their treatment as usual.
The sessions will be based on the existing protocol.
|
The intervention group will receive 32 individual CS sessions per participant.
Each session will last approximately 45 minutes and will have the following structure: session introduction (5 minutes); reality orientation (10 minutes); stimulation of cognitive domain (25 minutes); session closure (5 minutes).
The sessions will be led by a previously trained therapist.
The intervention program will include several activities based on the principles of CS and adjusted for participants with psychotic disorders.
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants assigned to the control group will maintain their usual treatment: social interaction activities, stimulation of personal skills, and any prescribed psychotic-specific medication.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cognitive functioning evaluated through Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]
Time Frame: baseline
|
Cognitive functioning is assessed using the MoCA which is a brief cognitive screening.
Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
|
baseline
|
Change in cognitive functioning evaluated through MoCA
Time Frame: 8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Cognitive functioning is assessed using the MoCA which is a brief cognitive screening.
Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
|
8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in cognitive functioning evaluated through MoCA
Time Frame: 16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Cognitive functioning is assessed using the MoCA which is a brief cognitive screening.
Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
|
16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in cognitive functioning evaluated through MoCA
Time Frame: 8 weeks after end of intervention
|
Cognitive functioning is assessed using the MoCA which is a brief cognitive screening.
Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.
|
8 weeks after end of intervention
|
Executive functions evaluated through Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The FAB is used to assess executive function in several subtests: conceptualization, mental flexibility, motor programming, sensitivity to interference, inhibitory control, and environmental autonomy.
Scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating better executive functioning.
|
baseline
|
Change in executive functions evaluated through FAB
Time Frame: 8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
The FAB is used to assess executive function in several subtests: conceptualization, mental flexibility, motor programming, sensitivity to interference, inhibitory control, and environmental autonomy.
Scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating better executive functioning.
|
8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in executive functions evaluated through FAB
Time Frame: 16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
The FAB is used to assess executive function in several subtests: conceptualization, mental flexibility, motor programming, sensitivity to interference, inhibitory control, and environmental autonomy.
Scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating better executive functioning.
|
16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in executive functions evaluated through FAB
Time Frame: 8 weeks after end of intervention
|
The FAB is used to assess executive function in several subtests: conceptualization, mental flexibility, motor programming, sensitivity to interference, inhibitory control, and environmental autonomy.
Scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating better executive functioning.
|
8 weeks after end of intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living evaluated through Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale
Time Frame: baseline
|
Lawton IADL Scale assesses level of independence of the elderly in relation to instrumental activities of daily living.
A score is assigned according to the subject's ability to perform a given task.
The score ranges between 8 and 30 points.
The highest score corresponds to a higher degree of dependence.
|
baseline
|
Change in self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living evaluated through Lawton IADL Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Lawton IADL Scale assesses level of independence of the elderly in relation to instrumental activities of daily living.
A score is assigned according to the subject's ability to perform a given task.
The score ranges between 8 and 30 points.
The highest score corresponds to a higher degree of dependence.
|
8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living evaluated through Lawton IADL Scale
Time Frame: 16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Lawton IADL Scale assesses level of independence of the elderly in relation to instrumental activities of daily living.
A score is assigned according to the subject's ability to perform a given task.
The score ranges between 8 and 30 points.
The highest score corresponds to a higher degree of dependence.
|
16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living evaluated through Lawton IADL Scale
Time Frame: 8 weeks after end of intervention
|
Lawton IADL Scale assesses level of independence of the elderly in relation to instrumental activities of daily living.
A score is assigned according to the subject's ability to perform a given task.
The score ranges between 8 and 30 points.
The highest score corresponds to a higher degree of dependence.
|
8 weeks after end of intervention
|
Depressive symptomatology assessed through the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: baseline
|
This instrument evaluated depressive symptoms using 20 answers.
Scores range between 0 and 60 points.
Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
|
baseline
|
Change in depressive symptomatology assessed through the CES-D
Time Frame: 8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
This instrument evaluated depressive symptoms using 20 answers.
Scores range between 0 and 60 points.
Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
|
8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in depressive symptomatology assessed through the CES-D
Time Frame: 16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
This instrument evaluated depressive symptoms using 20 answers.
Scores range between 0 and 60 points.
Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
|
16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in depressive symptomatology assessed through the CES-D
Time Frame: 8 weeks after end of intervention
|
This instrument evaluated depressive symptoms using 20 answers.
Scores range between 0 and 60 points.
Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.
|
8 weeks after end of intervention
|
Quality of life (QoL) evaluated through World Health Organization Quality of Life-Bref (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The WHOQOL-BREF is used to assess QoL.
Consisting of 26 items, it assesses several domains: physical health, mental health, social relationships and environment.
The first 2 items are intended to assess the individual's perception of his/her general QoL and general health.
The global score range between 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better QoL perceived by the subject.
|
baseline
|
Change in QoL evaluated through WHOQOL-BREF
Time Frame: 8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
The WHOQOL-BREF is used to assess QoL.
Consisting of 26 items, it assesses several domains: physical health, mental health, social relationships and environment.
The first 2 items are intended to assess the individual's perception of his/her general QoL and general health.
The global score range between 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better QoL perceived by the subject.
|
8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in QoL evaluated through WHOQOL-BREF
Time Frame: 16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
The WHOQOL-BREF is used to assess QoL.
Consisting of 26 items, it assesses several domains: physical health, mental health, social relationships and environment.
The first 2 items are intended to assess the individual's perception of his/her general QoL and general health.
The global score range between 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better QoL perceived by the subject.
|
16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in QoL evaluated through WHOQOL-BREF
Time Frame: 8 weeks after end of intervention
|
The WHOQOL-BREF is used to assess QoL.
Consisting of 26 items, it assesses several domains: physical health, mental health, social relationships and environment.
The first 2 items are intended to assess the individual's perception of his/her general QoL and general health.
The global score range between 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better QoL perceived by the subject.
|
8 weeks after end of intervention
|
Quality of life (QoL) evaluated through MOS Short Form Health Survey 36 Item v2 (SF-36v2)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The SF-36v2 is used to assess QoL.
Consisting of 36 items, it assesses eight dimensions of health (dimensions of health (physical, performance limitations due to physical or emotional problems, intensity and discomfort due to pain, general health, vitality, social function and mental health).
The global score range between 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better the health-related QoL.
|
baseline
|
Change in QoL evaluated through SF-36v2
Time Frame: 8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
The SF-36v2 is used to assess QoL.
Consisting of 36 items, it assesses eight dimensions of health (dimensions of health (physical, performance limitations due to physical or emotional problems, intensity and discomfort due to pain, general health, vitality, social function and mental health).
The global score range between 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better the health-related QoL.
|
8 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in QoL evaluated through SF-36v2
Time Frame: 16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
The SF-36v2 is used to assess QoL.
Consisting of 36 items, it assesses eight dimensions of health (dimensions of health (physical, performance limitations due to physical or emotional problems, intensity and discomfort due to pain, general health, vitality, social function and mental health).
The global score range between 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better the health-related QoL.
|
16 weeks after the beginning of the intervention
|
Change in QoL evaluated through SF-36v2
Time Frame: 8 weeks after end of intervention
|
The SF-36v2 is used to assess QoL.
Consisting of 36 items, it assesses eight dimensions of health (dimensions of health (physical, performance limitations due to physical or emotional problems, intensity and discomfort due to pain, general health, vitality, social function and mental health).
The global score range between 0 to 100.
Higher scores indicate better the health-related QoL.
|
8 weeks after end of intervention
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Sociodemographic information gathered through the sociodemographic questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline
|
Participants' answers in the sociodemographic questionnaire designed specifically for this study.
It gathers information about gender, age, marital status, educational level, clinical diagnosis and will be administered to all participants.
|
baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Susana I Justo Henriques, Ph.D., Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing (UICISA: E), Nursing School of Coimbra
- Principal Investigator: Ana E Marques Castro, M.Sc., Cediara - Associação de Solidariedade Social de Ribeira de Fráguas
- Principal Investigator: Enrique Pérez Sáez, Ph.D., National Reference Centre for Alzheimer's and Dementia Care, Imserso, Spain
- Principal Investigator: Janessa O Carvalho, Ph.D., Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, USA
- Principal Investigator: Ana P Sargaço Mendes, MD, Centro Hospitalar do Baixo Vouga, Aveiro, Portugal
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20210218
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Psychotic Disorders
-
Medical College of WisconsinCompletedSchizophrenia | Affective Disorders | Psychotic Disorder | Psychotic Mood Disorder
-
Søren Dinesen ØstergaardCompletedAffective Disorders, PsychoticDenmark
-
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario...CompletedSchizophrenia and Disorders With Psychotic Feature | Psychotic EpisodeSpain
-
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario...Carlos III Health Institute; European Regional Development FundCompletedSchizophrenia and Disorders With Psychotic Features | Psychotic EpisodeSpain
-
Centre hospitalier de Ville-Evrard, FranceRecruiting
-
University of MinnesotaUniversity of California, San FranciscoCompletedPsychotic Disorders | Schizophrenia | Schizoaffective Disorder | Cognitive Impairment | Psychosis | Treatment | Psychotic Depression | Psychotic Episode | Active Control | Psychotic Mood DisordersUnited States
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentNot yet recruitingMI-CBTech: A Mobile Intervention for Community Integration in Homeless-Experienced Veterans With SMIHomelessness | Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders | Psychotic Mood Disorders | Psychotic Affective Disorders | Ill-Housed PersonsUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoActive, not recruitingSchizophrenia | Schizoaffective Disorder | Mood Disorder, PsychoticUnited States
-
University Hospital, CaenRecruiting
-
Boston Medical CenterNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterCompletedPsychotic Disorders | Psychosis | Psychotic EpisodeUnited States
Clinical Trials on Individual cognitive stimulation therapy (iCST)
-
CEDIARA - Assoc. Solidariedade Social de Ribeira...CompletedNeurocognitive Disorders | Cognitive Impairment | Cognitive Dysfunction | Dementia | Cognitive Decline | Cognition Disorders in Old AgePortugal
-
Escola Superior de Enfermagem de CoimbraGrouping of Health Centers of Greater Porto I - Santo Tirso/Trofa; Group of...UnknownNeurocognitive Disorders | DementiaPortugal
-
Escola Superior de Enfermagem de CoimbraCompleted
-
Duke UniversityThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; VA Boston Healthcare... and other collaboratorsCompletedPosttraumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
Regionsenter for barn og unges psykiske helseThe Research Council of NorwayCompletedGeneralized Anxiety Disorder | Social Phobia | Separation Anxiety DisorderNorway
-
Stanford UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedSocial PhobiaUnited States
-
Florida International UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedAnxiety DisordersUnited States
-
University of Maryland, Baltimore CountyNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
University College, LondonThe University of Hong KongActive, not recruitingDementia | Dementia, Vascular | Dementia, Mixed | Dementia With Lewy Bodies | Dementia Alzheimers | Dementia of Alzheimer Type | Dementia, Multi-Infarct | Dementia, Mild | Dementia Moderate | Dementia Frontal | Dementia FrontotemporalUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad de CórdobaAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónActive, not recruitingDepression | Anxiety Disorders | Somatoform Disorders | Emotional DisorderSpain