- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04783441
Use of CGM in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) to Improve Glycemic Control in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Diabetes is one of the leading causes of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). Kidney transplantation is the best form of renal replacement therapy to date but requires that recipients of transplant organs maintain a complicated medication regimen in order to prevent graft loss. Their medications include lifelong immunosuppression, anti-microbials and other maintenance medications (i.e., anti-hypertensives, heart-protective regimens, bowel care, vitamins and pain medications).
For many transplant patients, glycemic control in the immediate post-operative period can be an additional challenge. Glycemic control may be hindered by recent surgery, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, altered nutritional intake and reduced mobility.
Diabetes professional organizations such as the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) recommend continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for anyone on intensive insulin therapy. The biggest benefit of CGM is not just the actual glucose value, but also its direction and rate of change. CGM data can also be downloaded and reflect patterns of glycemic control throughout the day and night, including not only the average blood glucose but also time-in-range (TIR) and degrees of glycemic variability. This can help identify unnotified nightly hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia and help titrate medications to achieve better glycemic control. Self-Management of blood glucose (SMBG) is a key component in effective glycemic management, but it places a large burden on the patient. Prior to CGM, SMBG was the only option to measure daily blood glucose fluctuations, but it is an imperfect tool. For patients on insulin, a blood glucose is checked at minimum 4 times per day, prior to meals and at bedtime. Additionally, the utility of SMBG can be endangered by patient decision making, the ability to check blood glucose, adherence to testing regimen, error due to poor testing technique, inadequate blood supply, contamination on fingers, or inaccuracy of some systems.
Numerous studies have shown the clinical benefit of CGM in the type-1 diabetes (T1D) and type-2 diabetes (T2D) populations (ref: Beck, Olafsdottir). The DIAMOND group (Beck) showed that CGM improved HBA1C and reduced hyperglycemia (BG>180). Patients wearing the CGM had high satisfaction scores and low perceived burden. CGM is still a new tool outside of the Type 1 Diabetes population but may have significant benefits for any patient on insulin. In Feb 2019 an international guideline on TIR (defined as blood glucose of 70-180 mg/dL) was published and TIR may become a new standard for assessing glycemic control.
The investigators research focuses on TIR and the benefits of CGM in the kidney transplant population. This can be essential for timely adjustments of insulin dosages when dealing with glycemic derangements and steroid induced hyperglycemia. CGM can provide an immense opportunity for a continuous 24/7 view of glucose values, glycemic variability, direction of change and unrecognized blood glucose levels during nighttime, and influence of food and activity on blood glucose values. In addition to the metrics described; the glucose management indicator (GMI) or also named estimated A1C (eA1C) is a measure converting the mean glucose from CGM using a formula derived from glucose readings from a population of individuals, into an estimate of a simultaneously measured laboratory A1C, this value may serve as an additional tool in assessing glycemic control. In conclusion: the use of a CGM can aid the provider and care team in better titration of insulin and medication regimen adjustment. This research hopes to give insight in a very complex population that has not had access to CGM before.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Dahlia Zuidema, PharmD
- Phone Number: 916-734-4009
- Email: dmzuidema@ucdavis.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Clinical Research Coordinators
- Phone Number: 916-734-4009
- Email: HS-TransplantCenterResearch@ucdavis.edu
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
- Recruiting
- UC Davis Health
-
Contact:
- Dahlia Zuidema, PharmD
- Phone Number: 916-734-4009
- Email: dmzuidema@ucdavis.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or above
- Received a kidney transplant within the past year with functioning kidney (eGFR > 30 mL/min
- Person with Type 2 Diabetes and on insulin
- Access to home wi-fi connection
Exclusion Criteria:
- Person with Type 1 Diabetes
- Patients taking hydroxyurea
- Patient unable to wear the Dexcom G6 device at all times for any reason
- Must be able to test blood glucose with meter 4x a day when on blinded CGM.
- Presence of clinically significant visual or cognitive impairment
- Illiterate
- Prisoners
- Women who are pregnant, who plan to become pregnant during the course of the study, or who are breastfeeding
- Presence of clinically unstable cardiovascular disease
- Active malignancy treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)
Those in the intervention arm will wear a continuous glucose monitoring device.
They only need to perform blood glucose fingersticks if the CGM transmission is lost for a prolonged period of time or in cases of hypo- or hyperglycemia when symptoms don't align with blood glucose readings.
|
access to continuous glucose monitoring in the Dexcom G6 arm 24/7
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Self monitoring of blood glucose (fingersticks)
The control arm will remain on standard-of-care SMBG while the intervention arm will use their CGM.
The control arm utilizing SMBG will be required to have at minimum 4 glucose checks per day.
|
retrospective access to continuous glucose profile after 10 days of wear
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time in Range (70-180 mg/dl)
Time Frame: 70 days
|
1) Time in Range: Number of minutes per day or percentage of time that glucose levels are in low (BG<70), target (BG 70-180), high (BG >180) or very high (BG>250) ranges.
|
70 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Glycemic variability
Time Frame: 70 days
|
assessed by the Coefficient of Variation (Glucose standard deviation divided by mean glucose).
% CV is a standardized measure that assesses the magnitude of glucose variability
|
70 days
|
|
CGM satisfaction questionnaire (10 questions)
Time Frame: up to 70 days
|
score on CGM questionnaire (1 = lowest and 5 = highest)
|
up to 70 days
|
|
Adherence to Diabetic Diet
Time Frame: up to 70 days
|
Use of ASA24 online 24 hr dietary recall at 3 times throughout the study
|
up to 70 days
|
|
Incidence of all-cause emergency room utilization and rehospitalizations
Time Frame: 70 days
|
during the study period (70 days)
|
70 days
|
|
Incidence of post-transplant infections during study period
Time Frame: 70 days
|
during the study period (70 days)
|
70 days
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
safety endpoint Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: 70 days
|
Hypoglycemia risk will be assessed as percentage of time below range (BG<70 mg/dl) and very low (BG <54 mg/dl).
|
70 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Ling Chen, MD, UCDavis Transplant Nephrology
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, Bosi E, Buckingham BA, Cefalu WT, Close KL, Cobelli C, Dassau E, DeVries JH, Donaghue KC, Dovc K, Doyle FJ 3rd, Garg S, Grunberger G, Heller S, Heinemann L, Hirsch IB, Hovorka R, Jia W, Kordonouri O, Kovatchev B, Kowalski A, Laffel L, Levine B, Mayorov A, Mathieu C, Murphy HR, Nimri R, Norgaard K, Parkin CG, Renard E, Rodbard D, Saboo B, Schatz D, Stoner K, Urakami T, Weinzimer SA, Phillip M. Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603. doi: 10.2337/dci19-0028. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
- Saisho Y. Use of Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire in Diabetes Care: Importance of Patient-Reported Outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 9;15(5):947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050947.
- Edelman SV, Argento NB, Pettus J, Hirsch IB. Clinical Implications of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring. Diabetes Care. 2018 Nov;41(11):2265-2274. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1150.
- Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Bergenstal R, Haller S, Kollman C, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Toschi E, Wolpert H, Price D; DIAMOND Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Using Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.19975.
- Garber AJ, Handelsman Y, Grunberger G, Einhorn D, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, Blonde L, Bush MA, DeFronzo RA, Garber JR, Garvey WT, Hirsch IB, Jellinger PS, McGill JB, Mechanick JI, Perreault L, Rosenblit PD, Samson S, Umpierrez GE. CONSENSUS STATEMENT BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS AND AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE TYPE 2 DIABETES MANAGEMENT ALGORITHM - 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Endocr Pract. 2020 Jan;26(1):107-139. doi: 10.4158/CS-2019-0472. No abstract available.
- Beck RW, Riddlesworth TD, Ruedy K, Ahmann A, Haller S, Kruger D, McGill JB, Polonsky W, Price D, Aronoff S, Aronson R, Toschi E, Kollman C, Bergenstal R; DIAMOND Study Group. Continuous Glucose Monitoring Versus Usual Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: A Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):365-374. doi: 10.7326/M16-2855. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
- Olafsdottir AF, Polonsky W, Bolinder J, Hirsch IB, Dahlqvist S, Wedel H, Nystrom T, Wijkman M, Schwarcz E, Hellman J, Heise T, Lind M. A Randomized Clinical Trial of the Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Nocturnal Hypoglycemia, Daytime Hypoglycemia, Glycemic Variability, and Hypoglycemia Confidence in Persons with Type 1 Diabetes Treated with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections (GOLD-3). Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Apr;20(4):274-284. doi: 10.1089/dia.2017.0363. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
- Longo R, Sperling S. Personal Versus Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring: When to Use Which on Whom. Diabetes Spectr. 2019 Aug;32(3):183-193. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0093.
- American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S98-S110. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S009.
- American Diabetes Association. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S77-S88. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S007.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1554226
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingType 2 Diabetes | Nutrition | Diabetes Type 2 | T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) | Diabetes Mellitis | T2DM | Diabetes EducationUnited States
-
ENBIOSIS BIOTECHNOLOGIESAydin Adnan Menderes University; Izmir University of Economics; Buca Seyfi Demirsoy... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingType 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion...Active, not recruiting
-
Endogenex, Inc.Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 2 Diabetes | Type2diabetes
-
University of SalamancaUniversity of Salamanca; Instituto Piaget; Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde...Enrolling by invitationType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Aging | Hyperglycemia Due to Type 2 Diabetes MellitusPortugal
-
Endogenex, Inc.Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | Type2Diabetes
-
University of Colorado, DenverMassachusetts General Hospital; Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of... and other collaboratorsRecruitingDiabetes Mellitus | Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type I | Diabetes Mellitus Type II | Diabetes Mellitus, Insulin-Dependent | Diabetes, Autoimmune | Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) | Diabetes Type 2 on Insulin | Diabetes, Type IIUnited States
-
Kaiser PermanenteThe Permanente Medical GroupEnrolling by invitationType 2 Diabetes | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) | Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)United States
-
SanofiCompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusHungary, Russian Federation, Germany, Poland, Japan, United States, Finland
-
Steno Diabetes Center CopenhagenRecruitingDiabetes | Cognitive Impairment | Type 2 Diabetes | Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 | Cognitive Decline | Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)Denmark
Clinical Trials on Dexcom G6
-
University of East AngliaCompletedDiabetes | HypoglycaemiaUnited Kingdom
-
Imperial College LondonCompletedType1diabetesUnited Kingdom
-
Kathleen DunganDexCom, Inc.Active, not recruiting
-
Medical University of GdanskNot yet recruitingHyperglycemia | Infections | Hypoglycemia | Surgical Site Infection | PeritonitisPoland
-
Ohio State UniversityRecruitingDiabetes, GestationalUnited States
-
Seoul National University HospitalRecruiting
-
Nordsjaellands HospitalCompletedDiabetes | Covid-19 | InfectionDenmark
-
Ohio State UniversityCompletedHyperglycemiaUnited States
-
DexCom, Inc.Recruiting
-
Blanchard Valley Health SystemEnrolling by invitation