A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals' Influenza Vaccine GSK3206641A Administered in Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age and 65 Years of Age and Older

September 11, 2023 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

A Phase I/II Observer-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multi-center Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of Different Formulations of Monovalent Influenza A/Hong Kong/125/2017-like (H7N9) Virus Vaccine With AS03 Adjuvant System, Given as a Two-dose Series to Adults 18 to 64 Years of Age and 65 Years of Age and Older

Study to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of H7N9 antigen in combination with full or half doses of AS03 adjuvant system in healthy adults.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

833

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Stockbridge, Georgia, United States, 30281
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Idaho
      • Meridian, Idaho, United States, 83642
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Cary, North Carolina, United States, 27518
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28401
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44122
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • South Carolina
      • Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77081
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Utah
      • West Jordan, Utah, United States, 84088
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy participants as established by medical history and clinical examination before entering into the study.
  • A male or female ≥ 18 years of age at the time of first vaccination.
  • Participants, who, in the opinion of the investigator, can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol (e.g. completion of the diary cards and COVID-19 assessment card, return for follow-up visits, or return the diary cards and COVID-19 assessment card in a timely manner using the pre stamped envelope received at the site).
  • Written or witnessed/thumb printed informed consent obtained from the participant prior to performance of any study specific procedure.
  • Female participants of non-childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study. Non childbearing potential is defined as pre-menarche, current bilateral tubal ligation or occlusion hysterectomy, bilateral ovariectomy or post-menopause.
  • Female participants of childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study, if the participant:

    • has practiced adequate contraception for 1 month prior to vaccination, and
    • has a negative pregnancy test on the day of vaccination, and
    • has agreed to continue adequate contraception during the entire treatment period and for 2 months after completion of the vaccination series.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current diagnosis or history of autoimmune disorder(s).
  • History of any reaction or hypersensitivity likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine.
  • Hypersensitivity to latex.
  • Acute or chronic clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality that appears uncontrolled, as determined by history or physical examination.
  • Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition, based on medical history and physical examination (no laboratory testing required).
  • Recurrent history or uncontrolled neurological disorders or seizures.
  • History of Guillain-Barré syndrome.
  • Diagnosed with narcolepsy; or history of narcolepsy in a participant's parent, sibling or child.
  • Diagnosed with cancer, or treatment for cancer within 3 years.
  • Persons with a history of cancer who are disease-free without treatment for 3 years or more are eligible.
  • Persons with a history of histologically-confirmed basal cell carcinoma of the skin successfully treated with local excision only are accepted and are eligible, but other histologic types of skin cancer are exclusionary.
  • Women who are disease-free 3 years or more after treatment for breast cancer and receiving long-term prophylaxis (for example, with tamoxifen) are eligible.
  • Documented human immunodeficiency virus-positive participant.
  • Any clinically significant* hematological laboratory abnormality.

    *The investigator should use his/her clinical judgement to decide which abnormalities are clinically significant.

  • Bedridden participants.
  • Any other clinical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might pose additional risk to the participant due to participation in the study.
  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug, vaccine or medical device) other than the study vaccine/product during the period beginning 30 days before the first dose of study vaccine/product (Day -29 to Day 1), or planned use during the study period.
  • Administration of long-acting immune-modifying drugs at any time during the study period (e.g. infliximab).
  • Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products or plasma derivatives during the period starting 3 months before the first dose of study vaccine/product or planned administration during the study period.
  • Chronic administration (defined as more than 14 days in total) of immunosuppressants or other immune-modifying drugs during the period starting 3 months prior to the first vaccine/product dose. For corticosteroids, this will mean prednisone equivalent ≥ 20 mg/day. Inhaled and topical steroids are allowed.
  • Concurrently participating in another clinical study, at any time during the study period, in which the participant has been or will be exposed to an investigational or a non-investigational vaccine/product (drug or medical device).
  • Pregnant or lactating female.
  • Female planning to become pregnant or planning to discontinue contraceptive precautions within 2 months after completion of the vaccination series.
  • History of or current chronic alcohol consumption and/or drug abuse.
  • Any other clinical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, might pose additional risk to the participant due to participation in the study.
  • Any study personnel or immediate dependents, family, or household member.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 1_B Group
Healthy male and female participants who received two doses of FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 1 vaccine and AS03B adjuvant. Participants received the first dose at Day 1 and the second dose at Day 22.
Participants received two doses of the FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 1 vaccine by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Participants received two doses of the AS03B adjuvant by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Active Comparator: FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 1_A Group
Healthy male and female participants who received two doses of FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 1 vaccine and AS03A adjuvant. Participants received the first dose at Day 1 and the second dose at Day 22.
Participants received two doses of the FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 1 vaccine by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Participants received two doses of the AS03A adjuvant by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Active Comparator: FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 2_B Group
Healthy male and female participants who received two doses of FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 2 vaccine and AS03B adjuvant. Participants received the first dose at Day 1 and the second dose at Day 22.
Participants received two doses of the AS03B adjuvant by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Participants received two doses of the FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 2 vaccine by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Active Comparator: FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 2_A Group
Healthy male and female participants who received two doses of FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 2 vaccine and AS03A adjuvant. Participants received the first dose at Day 1 and the second dose at Day 22.
Participants received two doses of the AS03A adjuvant by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Participants received two doses of the FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 2 vaccine by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Active Comparator: FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 3_B Group
Healthy male and female participants who received two doses of FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 3 vaccine and AS03B adjuvant. Participants received the first dose at Day 1 and the second dose at Day 22.
Participants received two doses of the AS03B adjuvant by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Participants received two doses of the FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 3 vaccine by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Active Comparator: FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 3_A Group
Healthy male and female participants who received two doses of FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 3 vaccine and AS03A adjuvant. Participants received the first dose at Day 1 and the second dose at Day 22.
Participants received two doses of the AS03A adjuvant by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Participants received two doses of the FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 3 vaccine by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Group
Healthy male and female participants who received two doses of placebo, the first dose at Day 1 and the second dose at Day 22.
Participants received two doses of Placebo by intramuscular injection in the non-dominant arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Seroprotected Participants for Anti-hemagglutination Inhibition (HI) Antibodies Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9
Time Frame: At Day 43
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) criteria for seroprotection rate (SPR) for 18 to 64 years of age is shown if the Lower Limit (LL) of the 99.17% confidence interval (CI) for the SPR meets or exceeds 70%, and for greater than or equal to (≥) 65 years of age if the LL of the 99.17% CI for the SPR meets or exceeds 60%. SPR is defined as the percentage of participants with an HI antibody titer ≥40 1/dilution (DIL). The percentage of participants was calculated along with Clopper-Pearson exact two-sided 99.17% CIs.
At Day 43
Percentage of Seroconverted Participants for Anti-HI Antibodies Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9
Time Frame: At Day 43

CBER criteria for seroconversion rate (SCR) for 18 to 64 years of age is shown if LL of the 99.17% CI for the SCR meets or exceeds 40%, and for ≥65 years of age, if the LL of the 99.17% CI for the SCR meets or exceeds 30%. Seroconversion is defined as a post-vaccination antibody titer ≥40 1/DIL in the serum of participants seronegative before vaccination (i.e. titer < assay cut-off at Day 1). For seropositive participants (i.e. titer ≥ assay cut-off at Day 1), seroconversion requires a 4-fold rise in post-vaccination HI antibody titer (but at least a titer of 40 1/DIL). The percentage of participants was calculated with Clopper-Pearson exact two-sided 99.17% CIs.

Note: The cut-off value for antibody titer was defined by the laboratory before the analysis.

At Day 43
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Administration Site Events
Time Frame: Within the 7-day follow-up period after Dose 1
Solicited administered site events assessed were pain, redness and swelling. Any Pain = occurrence of symptom regardless of intensity grade. Any Redness or any Swelling symptom = any symptom having a surface diameter greater than (>) 20 millimeters (mm).
Within the 7-day follow-up period after Dose 1
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Administration Site Events
Time Frame: Within the 7-day follow-up period after Dose 2
Solicited administered site events assessed were pain, redness and swelling. Any Pain = occurrence of symptom regardless of intensity grade. Any Redness or any Swelling symptom = any symptom having a surface diameter >20 mm.
Within the 7-day follow-up period after Dose 2
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Systemic Events
Time Frame: Within the 7-day follow-up period after Dose 1
Solicited systemic events assessed were fatigue, fever, headache, muscle ache all over body, joint pain, shivering, sweating and gastrointestinal symptoms (Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain). Any = occurrence of symptom regardless of intensity grade. Fever was defined as temperature ≥38 degrees Celsius (°C) for oral route (preferred location for measuring temperature).
Within the 7-day follow-up period after Dose 1
Number of Participants With Any Solicited Systemic Events
Time Frame: Within the 7-day follow-up period after Dose 2
Solicited systemic events assessed were fatigue, fever, headache, muscle ache all over body, joint pain, shivering, sweating and gastrointestinal symptoms (Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain). Any = occurrence of symptom regardless of intensity grade. Fever was defined as temperature ≥38°C for oral route (preferred location for measuring temperature).
Within the 7-day follow-up period after Dose 2
Number of Participants With Any and Related Unsolicited Adverse Events
Time Frame: Within the 21-day follow-up period after Dose 1
An unsolicited adverse event (AE) is an AE that was not solicited using a Participant Diary and that was spontaneously communicated by a participant who had signed the informed consent. Unsolicited AEs include serious and non-serious AEs. Potential unsolicited AEs may have been medically attended (i.e. symptoms or illnesses requiring a hospitalization, or emergency room visit, or visit to/by a health care provider). Unsolicited AEs that were not medically attended nor perceived as a concern by participant were collected during interview with the participants and by review of available medical records at the following visit. An unsolicited adverse event is any event reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.
Within the 21-day follow-up period after Dose 1
Number of Participants With Any and Related Unsolicited Adverse Events
Time Frame: Within the 21-day follow-up period after Dose 2
An unsolicited AE is an AE that was not solicited using a Participant Diary and that was spontaneously communicated by a participant who has signed the informed consent. Unsolicited AEs include serious and non-serious AEs. Potential unsolicited AEs may have been medically attended (i.e. symptoms or illnesses requiring a hospitalization, or emergency room visit, or visit to/by a health care provider). Unsolicited AEs that were not medically attended nor perceived as a concern by participant are collected during interview with the participants and by review of available medical records at the next visit. An unsolicited adverse event is any event reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms.
Within the 21-day follow-up period after Dose 2
Number of Participants With Any and Related Medically Attended Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: Within the 21-day follow-up period after Dose 1
MAEs were defined as adverse events with medically-attended visits that are not routine visits for physical examination or vaccination, such as visits for hospitalization, an emergency room visit, or an otherwise unscheduled visit to or from medical personnel (medical doctor) for any reason.
Within the 21-day follow-up period after Dose 1
Number of Participants With Any and Related MAEs
Time Frame: Within the 21-day follow-up period after Dose 2
MAEs were defined as adverse events with medically-attended visits that are not routine visits for physical examination or vaccination, such as visits for hospitalization, an emergency room visit, or an otherwise unscheduled visit to or from medical personnel (medical doctor) for any reason.
Within the 21-day follow-up period after Dose 2
Number of Participants With Any and Related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Day 43
A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant. Abnormal pregnancy outcomes were also considered (e.g. spontaneous abortion, fatal death, stillbirth, congenital anomalies, ectopic pregnancy) or other situations where medical or scientific judgement was exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate.
From Day 1 up to Day 43
Number of Participants With Any and Related Potential Immune Mediated Diseases (pIMDs)
Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Day 43
pIMDs are a subset of adverse events of special interest that included autoimmune diseases and other inflammatory and/or neurologic disorders of interest which may or may not have had an autoimmune etiology.
From Day 1 up to Day 43
Number of Participants With Any pIMDs
Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Month 13
pIMDs are a subset of adverse events of special interest that included autoimmune diseases and other inflammatory and/or neurologic disorders of interest which may or may not have had an autoimmune etiology.
From Day 1 up to Month 13
Number of Participants With Any SAEs
Time Frame: From Day 1 up to Month 13
A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study participant. Abnormal pregnancy outcomes were also considered (e.g. spontaneous abortion, fatal death, stillbirth, congenital anomalies, ectopic pregnancy) or other situations where medical or scientific judgement was exercised in deciding whether reporting was appropriate.
From Day 1 up to Month 13

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HI Antibody Titers Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9
Time Frame: At Day 1, Day 22 and Day 43

HI antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs). The GMTs calculations were performed by taking the anti-log of the mean of the titer transformations. Values for titers below the assay cutoff will be assigned half the assay cut-off value for the purpose of GMT computation.

Note: The cut-off value for HI titer was defined by the laboratory before the analysis.

At Day 1, Day 22 and Day 43
Percentage of Seropositive Participants for HI Antibodies Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9
Time Frame: At Day 1, Day 22 and Day 43

A seropositive participant is a participant whose antibody titer was greater than or equal to the assay cut-off value.

Note: The cut-off value for antibody titer was defined by the laboratory before the analysis.

At Day 1, Day 22 and Day 43
Percentage of Seroconverted Participants for HI Antibodies Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9
Time Frame: At Day 22

Seroconversion rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a post-vaccination antibody titer ≥40 1/DIL in the serum of participants seronegative before vaccination (i.e. titer < assay cut-off at Day 1). For seropositive participants (i.e. titer ≥ assay cut-off at Day 1), seroconversion required a 4-fold rise in post-vaccination HI antibody titer (but at least a titer of 40 1/DIL).

Note: The cut-off value for antibody titer was defined by the laboratory before the analysis.

At Day 22
Percentage of Seroprotected Participants for HI Antibodies Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9
Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 22

SPR is defined as the percentage of participants with HI antibody titer ≥40 1/DIL.

Note: The cut-off value for antibody titer was defined by the laboratory before the analysis.

At Day 1 and Day 22
Mean Geometric Increase (MGI) of HI Antibody Titers Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9
Time Frame: At Day 22 (post-Dose 1/pre-vaccination) and Day 43 (post-Dose 2/pre-vaccination)
MGI was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs post-vaccination compared to pre-vaccination (Day 1): post-vaccination GMT over pre-vaccination GMT.
At Day 22 (post-Dose 1/pre-vaccination) and Day 43 (post-Dose 2/pre-vaccination)
Anti-microneutralization (MN) Antibody Titers Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9 for a Subset of Participants
Time Frame: At Day 1, Day 22 and Day 43
Anti-MN antibody titers were expressed as GMTs. The GMTs calculations were performed by taking the antilog of the mean of the log titer transformations. Values for the neutralisation titers below the assay cut-off were assigned half the assay cut-off value for the purpose of GMT computation. MN analyses were performed on the MN subset that included approximately 420 participants (60 per group). The first 30 participants per treatment group were selected in the ≥65 age group and then the first 15 participants in 18 to 49 years and 50 to 64 years age groups. If there were not 15 participants for the 18 to 49 or 50 to 64 years age groups, they were selected whichever had the smaller number fully and then had a total of 30 for the total among these 2 age groups per treatment group. All samples were collected first, then selected for the subset.
At Day 1, Day 22 and Day 43
Percentage of Seropositive Participants for Vaccine-homologous H7N9 MN Antibody Titers for a Subset of Participants
Time Frame: At Day 1, Day 22 and Day 43

A seropositive participant is a participant whose antibody titer was greater than or equal to the assay cut-off value.

Note: The cut-off value for antibody titer was defined by the laboratory before the analysis. MN analyses were performed on the MN subset.

At Day 1, Day 22 and Day 43
Vaccine Response Rate (VRR) of Anti-MN Antibodies Against Vaccine-homologous H7N9 for a Subset of Participants
Time Frame: At Day 22 and Day 43
VRR is expressed as the percentage of participants with a vaccine response defined as at least a 4-fold increase in antibody titer as compared to the antibody titer at Day 1 (pre-vaccination). Antibody titers below the cut-off of the assay were given an arbitrary value of half the cut-off for the purpose of vaccine response calculation. For VRR, the percentage of participants was calculated with Clopper-Pearson exact two-sided 95% CIs. MN analyses were performed on the MN subset.
At Day 22 and Day 43

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: GSK Clinical Trials, GlaxoSmithKline

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 9, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD will be made available within 6 months of publishing the results of the primary endpoints, key secondary endpoints and safety data of the study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Influenza, Human

Clinical Trials on FLU-Q-PAN H7N9 Formulation 1

3
Subscribe