NuGa (Nutrition for Gastric Cancer Patients)

October 19, 2021 updated by: Han-Kwang Yang, Seoul National University Hospital

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Efficacy of Digital Health Technology for Postoperative Care With Gastrectomy-Treated Patients in Gastric Cancer

The objective of this pilot study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Rhexium Onco Nutrition, HDT-202 for post-operative care in patients who have undergone gastrectomy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

  1. A total of 4 visits will be performed.
  2. At the screening visit,subject's written informed consent, assessing the inclusion/exclusion criteria and assigning enrollment numbers to eligible subjects, demographic information taking, medical history/medication history taking, vital signs measuring, physical examination, height and body weight measuring, instructing how to install/use the investigational device, and administering quality of life questionnaires.
  3. During the treatment period, a total of 3 visits will be performed. To evaluate feasibility and efficacy, the following procedures will be carried out: vital signs measuring, physical examination, nutrition assessment/consultation, evaluation of feasibility for 'subjects', evaluation of feasibility for 'investigators', and adverse events (AEs)/concomitant medications checking and collecting.
  4. During the treatment period, telephone monitoring is conducted depending on the compliance of subjects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 110-744
        • Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient who voluntarily signs the informed consent form for this study
  2. Age of ≥19 years old
  3. Patient who has undergone therapeutic gastrectomy after a diagnosis of gastric cancer
  4. Able to eat food orally after gastrectomy
  5. Patient who possesses an Android OS based mobile device and is capable of using the investigational device.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Other cancer or metastasis documented within 5 years prior to screening
  2. Ongoing or planned enteral tube feeding or total parenteral nutrition
  3. Other clinically significant medical or psychiatric findings based on which the individual is considered by the investigator to be ineligible
  4. Individual who possesses a mobile device on which the application is unable to be installed and/or run normally for technical reasons
  5. Individual who, in the opinion of the investigator, has difficulty understanding how to use the investigational device or is unlikely to comply with other study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rhexium Onco Nutrition(HDT-202)
"subject mobile application" and "Investigator web portal" with no invasive action on the human body
The research devices in this study are classified into "subject mobile application" and "investigator web portal" with no invasive action on the human body
Other Names:
  • HDT-202

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
Time Frame: Week 2 (Visit 2)
higher scores mean a better outcome
Week 2 (Visit 2)
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
Time Frame: Week 6 (Visit 3),
higher scores mean a better outcome
Week 6 (Visit 3),
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (application)' questionnaire for subjects
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
higher scores mean a better outcome
Week 10 (Visit 4)
Score of each domain of the 'feasibility assessment of the investigational device (website)' questionnaire for investigators
Time Frame: Week 6 (Visit 3)
higher scores mean a better outcome
Week 6 (Visit 3)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'EORTC QLQ-C30' score
Time Frame: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Refer to Title
baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'EORTC QLQ-STO22' score
Time Frame: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Refer to Title
baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Change from baseline (Visit 1) in 'KOQUSS Index' score
Time Frame: baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Refer to Title
baseline (Visit 1), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Correlation between change from Day 1 in body weight at Week 10 (Visit 4) and calory goal achievement rate
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Refer to Title
Week 10 (Visit 4)
Correlation between change from Day 1 in body weight at Week 10 (Visit 4) and protein intake goal achievement rate
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Refer to Title
Week 10 (Visit 4)
Frequency of each symptom between visits after using the investigational device (application)
Time Frame: Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Refer to Title
Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by age
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by gender
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by surgery
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by stage of disease
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by body mass index [BMI] before discharge from hospital
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2, compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by status of postoperative anticancer therapy
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Week 10 (Visit 4)
The investigational device(application) usage compliance by underlying disease
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
compliance(%) will be measured to day of usage/total period*100
Week 10 (Visit 4)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of each symptom by baseline characteristics (age, gender, surgery, stage of disease, BMI before discharge from hospital, status of postoperative anticancer therapy, underlying disease)
Time Frame: Week 10 (Visit 4)
Refer to Title
Week 10 (Visit 4)
Frequency of Adverse Events
Time Frame: Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 10 (Visit 4)
Incident rate of Adverse Events will be reported
Week 2 (Visit 2), Week 6 (Visit 3), Week 10 (Visit 4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Han-Kwang Yang, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Rhexium Onco Nutrition

Subscribe