- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04801004
A Real-world Study to Evaluate the Primary Patency and Freedom From TLR of Endovascular Treatment in TOSAKA III In-stent Restenosis of Lower Extremity Femoropopliteal Artery. (FP-Restore)
October 26, 2022 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
This study is a prospective, multi-center, real world, observational study, which aims at evaluating the safety, efficacy and economic cost of endovascular treatments for endovascular therapies in tosaka III (totally occluded) in-stent restenosis.It is estimated that 300 subjects diagnosed with tosaka III in-stent restenosis and receive endovascular treatments will be enrolled in nine centers from April 2021 to December 2022 nation-widely.
All the subjects will be under follow-up for 24 months.
There is no restriction on the endovascular techniques.
The primary outcomes include clinical-driven freedom from TLR at 24 months.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
In-stent restenosis was a series of complications of treatment in peripheral artery disease, which lead the fluid of lower extremity re-limited even chronic limb ischemia and amputation.
Its typical symptoms were recurrent claudication, rest pain and ischemic.
Tosaka III in-stent restenosis, which also called in-stent occlusion was one of the most serious of this kind of complications.
Its symptoms usually more severe and irreversible, and its treatments were complicated and challenging.
The efficacy of single balloon angioplasty is limited.
New devices including drug-coated balloon, intravascular Lithotripsy, directional atherectomy, laser debulking devices and stent-grafts offer another chance and better prognosis.
The data of these new devices, however, are mainly from low-quality evidence.
Therefore, we start this prospective, multicenter, real-world, observational study, providing new data on the safety, efficacy and health economics evaluation of endovascular treatments for Tosaka III in-stent restenosis.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Anticipated)
300
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Zhenyu Shi, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: +86021-64041990
- Email: shizhenyumax@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Shanghai, China
- Recruiting
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
The patients with Tosaka III in-stent restenosis lower extremity femoropopliteal artery.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Tosaka III In-stent restenosis after stent implantation in PAD patients (Including acute and subacute thrombotic lesions).
- Rutherford grade 2-5.
- Stents should be located in the femoropopliteal artery.
- The stenosis of iliac artery on the affected side is less than 30% or the residual stenosis after treatment is less than 30%.
- Informed consent has been signed
Exclusion Criteria:
- Tosaka I or II in-stent restenosis.
- Stents are located in iliac artery or artery below the knee, or the preoperative CTA showed type 3 or 4 stent fracture.
- Rutherford Grade 6.
- Thromboangiitis obliterans (TAO)-based, arteritis-based or connective tissue disorder-based FP-ISR.
- Intraoperative conversion to hybrid or open surgery.
- Patients refusing to sign informed consent forms.
- Life expectancy of patients is less than 12 months.
- The pregnant or nursing patients.
- The patients with severe ischemia of lower extremity who would receive major amputation in plan.
- Patients in whom antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated.
- Myocardial infarction or stroke within 3 months prior to enrolment.
- Patient with known allergy to contrast agents or medications used to perform endovascular intervention.
- Patients participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint.
- Patients who refuse to cooperate with long-term follow-up or who have difficulty communicating.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Freedom from clinically-driven TLR
Time Frame: 24 months
|
CD-TLR was defined as any reintervention within the target lesion(s) because of recurrent symptoms.
Freedom form CD-TLR were defined as the rates of the number of patients who did not receive reintervention verse the number of patients during the follow-up period.
|
24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Primary patency
Time Frame: 1month, 6 months,12 months, 18 months ,24 months
|
The primary patency rate was defined as the percentage of stent patency examined by DUS or CTA examination of lower limb arteries during follow-up.
|
1month, 6 months,12 months, 18 months ,24 months
|
Technical success rate
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Successfully revascularize the target vessel.
The residual stenosis is <30% and there is no acute thrombosis occurred in the target vessel within 30 days post-operation.
The Technical success rate was defined as the rate of the number of patients who receive the treatment as intended verse the number of the patients enrolled.
|
30 days
|
Incidence of major adverse events.
Time Frame: 1month, 3 months,6 months, 12 months ,24 months
|
Major adverse events include anyone of the following: all-cause mortality, Myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, and major amputation of a vascular etiology, and arterial thrombosis related to endovascular manipulation.
|
1month, 3 months,6 months, 12 months ,24 months
|
Freedom from TLR
Time Frame: 1month, 6 months,12 months, 18 months
|
TLR was defined as a reintervention performed for >50% diameter stenosis or in the target lesion after documentation of recurrent clinical symptoms following the index procedure or bailout stenting during the index procedure.
Freedom form TLR were defined as the rates of the number of patients who did not receive reintervention verse the number of patients during the follow-up period.
|
1month, 6 months,12 months, 18 months
|
Vascular quality of life questionnaire(VascuQol)
Time Frame: 3 months,6 months, 12 months ,24 months
|
The VascuQol was designed as a questionnaire containing five domains: pain (4 items), symptoms (4 items), activities (8 items), social (2 items), and emotional (7 items) to evaluate Health related quality of life (HRQL).
Every item has seven response options, with scores ranging from 1 to 7. A total score is the sum of all 25 item scores divided by 25.And both the total score as well as the domain scores range from 1 (worst HRQL) to 7 (best HRQL).The lower the value, the poorer the quality of life.
|
3 months,6 months, 12 months ,24 months
|
Health economics evaluation
Time Frame: 24months
|
All the cost related to the target vessel and spent in the inpatient ward will be recorded and analyzed.
|
24months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Li X, Zhou M, Ding Y, Wang Y, Cai L, Shi Z. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of debulking devices for in-stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal artery. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):356-366.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.058. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
- Tepe G, Schroeder H, Albrecht T, Reimer P, Diehm N, Baeriswyl JL, Brechtel K, Speck U, Zeller T. Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon vs Uncoated Balloon Angioplasty for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries: The COPA CABANA Trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):276-286. doi: 10.1177/1526602820907917. Epub 2020 Feb 25. Erratum In: J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Apr;27(2):350.
- Tosaka A, Soga Y, Iida O, Ishihara T, Hirano K, Suzuki K, Yokoi H, Nanto S, Nobuyoshi M. Classification and clinical impact of restenosis after femoropopliteal stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 3;59(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.036.
- Armstrong EJ, Thiruvoipati T, Tanganyika K, Singh GD, Laird JR. Laser Atherectomy for Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis. J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Aug;22(4):506-13. doi: 10.1177/1526602815592133. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
- Dippel EJ, Makam P, Kovach R, George JC, Patlola R, Metzger DC, Mena-Hurtado C, Beasley R, Soukas P, Colon-Hernandez PJ, Stark MA, Walker C; EXCITE ISR Investigators. Randomized controlled study of excimer laser atherectomy for treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: initial results from the EXCITE ISR trial (EXCImer Laser Randomized Controlled Study for Treatment of FemoropopliTEal In-Stent Restenosis). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jan;8(1 Pt A):92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
- Kokkinidis DG, Behan S, Jawaid O, Hossain P, Giannopoulos S, Singh GD, Laird JR, Valle JA, Waldo SW, Armstrong EJ. Laser atherectomy and drug-coated balloons for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis: 2-Year outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 15;95(3):439-446. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28636. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
- Kinstner CM, Lammer J, Willfort-Ehringer A, Matzek W, Gschwandtner M, Javor D, Funovics M, Schoder M, Koppensteiner R, Loewe C, Ristl R, Wolf F. Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty in In-Stent Restenosis of the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Artery: 1-Year Results of the PACUBA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jul 11;9(13):1386-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.04.012.
- Bosiers M, Deloose K, Callaert J, Verbist J, Hendriks J, Lauwers P, Schroe H, Lansink W, Scheinert D, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Beschorner U, Noory E, Torsello G, Austermann M, Wauters J. Stent-grafts are the best way to treat complex in-stent restenosis lesions in the superficial femoral artery: 24-month results from a multicenter randomized trial. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2020 Oct;61(5):617-625. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.20.11382-X.
- Shammas NW, Petruzzi N, Henao S, Armstrong EJ, Shimshak T, Banerjee S, Latif F, Eaves B, Brothers T, Golzar J, Shammas GA, Jones-Miller S, Christensen L, Shammas WJ. JetStream Atherectomy for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis of the Femoropopliteal Segment: One-Year Results of the JET-ISR Study. J Endovasc Ther. 2021 Feb;28(1):107-116. doi: 10.1177/1526602820951916. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
- Torsello G, Stavroulakis K, Brodmann M, Micari A, Tepe G, Veroux P, Benko A, Choi D, Vermassen FEG, Jaff MR, Guo J, Dobranszki R, Zeller T; IN.PACT Global Investigators. Three-Year Sustained Clinical Efficacy of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in a Real-World Femoropopliteal Cohort. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Oct;27(5):693-705. doi: 10.1177/1526602820931477. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 31, 2022
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 31, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 14, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
March 16, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 28, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 26, 2022
Last Verified
October 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- The FP-artery Restore study
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease
-
University of NebraskaNot yet recruitingPeripheral Arterial Disease | Peripheral Vascular Diseases | Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
CID S.p.A.Meditrial Europe Ltd.Not yet recruitingPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseItaly
-
Marissa JarosinskiRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery Disease | Clopidogrel, Poor Metabolism of | Artery DiseaseUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityTerminatedPAD - Peripheral Arterial Disease | PVD- Peripheral Vascular DiseaseUnited States
-
Vascuros Medical Pte LtdNovella ClinicalUnknownPeripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease | Peripheral Vascular Disease | Peripheral Artery DiseaseSingapore, Belgium, Germany
-
Western Vascular Institute, IrelandRecruitingPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseIreland
-
Jena University HospitalAngioDroid s.r.l., Bologna (Italy)CompletedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseGermany
-
Seoul National University HospitalAstellas Pharma Korea, Inc.CompletedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Heidelberg UniversityTerminatedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseGermany
-
Johann Wolfgang Goethe University HospitalSuspendedPeripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseGermany