Pedagogues Promoting Positive Parenting in a Home-visiting Program in At-risk Families: A RCT of VIPP-SD

May 21, 2026 updated by: Mette Væver, University of Copenhagen

An Ounce of Prevention is Worth a Pound of Cure: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Pedagogues Promoting Positive Parenting in a Home-visiting Program in At-risk Families

Supportive parenting is a strong predictor of positive outcomes for children, and harsh parenting is a risk factor for child development, especially for the child developing externalizing problems (overactive, oppositional, and aggressive behavior). Externalizing problems in preschoolers are predictive of a variety of problems in later childhood. Thus, parents are key targets for change in preventive programs with children at risk for developing externalizing problems. More than 95% of 2-6 year old Danish children spend an average of 7.5 hours, 5 days a week in a daycare setting, thus pedagogues are key frontline staff in the promotion of parental abilities and early childhood mental health. However, a recent Danish study shows that pedagogues experience a need for systematic skills and methods for intervening in families with a child at risk. Attachment-based programs enhancing parental sensitivity and parental sensitive discipline show promising results. This efficacy study examines the Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP-SD)delivered by 22 VIPP-SD trained pedagogues at home-visits to 120 families with a child (1-6 years) identified to be at risk. Pedagogues are supervised by four VIPP municipality psychologists, thus promoting the cross-disciplinary collaboration. The results will point to future identification of families that may (and may not) profit from a pedagogue delivered VIPP-SD intervention, as well as to revise the intervention in order to maximizing its effect, i.e. point to changes to tailor intervention to the particular needs of different families in a Danish context.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 1353
        • Center for Early Interventions and Family Studies, Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child 2-6 year old
  • Parent must be more than 18 years old
  • Parent must speak and understand Danish
  • Family must live in the municipalities of Frederiksberg or Roskilde - and having no intentions of moving out of the municipality before after the intervention has ended
  • Parent can attend other treatment initiatives
  • Child must attend a daycare center in one of the two municipalities
  • Child must be at risk of developing externalizing behavior, i.e. showing signs of overactive, oppositional, and aggressive behavior.

Exclusion criteria

  • Sexual or physical abuse by parent
  • Parental drug or alcohol abuse
  • Child diagnosis of autism
  • Child is not considered at risk of developing externalizing behavior problems, but may have other problems, such as delayed language or motordevelopment etc

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VIPP-SD (Video-feedback Intervention to Promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline).
The VIPP-SD includes seven sessions of 1½-2 hours each with an 2-4 weeks interval VIPP-SD is delivered by a VIPP-SD trained pedagogue and takes place in the family home and the targeted parent and child are videotaped during daily interactions. The intervener studies the video and prepares feedback. During the sessions, the intervener and parent review the video together and the intervener provides their feedback according to the VIPP-SD protocol.
Parenting program
Active Comparator: Care as ususl
The existing standard practices for parents of 2-6 year old children identified to be at risk for developing externalizing problems in the participating municipalities will be the active control condition. These vary in content and duration in the municipalities. Likewise, CAU may change during the project period. The exact content and duration of CAU interventions as well as participants' adherence to treatment will be described as precisely as possible.
Parenting program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parental attitudes toward sensitivity and sensitive discipline (ATSSD)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Questionnaire regarding parents' attitudes towards parenting (Bakermans-Kranenburg & Van IJzendoorn, 2003)
Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parenting Daily Hassles (PDH)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Parenting Daily Hassles scale where parents are asked to rate 20 minor parenting stresses that often occur in families with small children (Crnic & Greenberg, 1990).
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Parenting Stress
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
via self-report using Parenting Stress IndexTM, Fourth Edition Short Form (PSI-4-SF;Abidin, 1995)
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Parental Mentalizing
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
self-report using the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ; Luyten, Mayes, Nijssens, & Fonagy, 2017).
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Family functioning
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
self-report using the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD), the six item version (de Haan et al., 2015)
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Parental symptoms of anxiety
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Anxiety symptoms will be assessed with GAD-7, which is a 7-item screening questionnaire for generalized anxiety disorder (Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams & Löwe, 2006).
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Parental behavioral sensitivity and sensitive discipline
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Parental sensitivity will be coded from video recordings of parent-child free play. Coding will be conducted using Coding Interactive Behavior (CIB) (Feldman, 1998).

Parental sensitive discipline will be coded from video recordings of a "don't touch task" and a "clean-up task". Coding procedure will be based on guidelines from Kuczynski et al., 1987 and Van der Mark et al., 2002.

Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Child behavior problems
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
This is measured using the Strengths and Difficulties questionnaire (SDQ), which is completed by both parents and pedagogues (Goodman, 1997; Danish version by Niclasen et al., 2012).
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Child socio-emotional development
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Child socio-emotional development is assessed via parental report using the Ages & Stages Questionnaires®: Social-Emotional, Second Edition (ASQ®:SE-2) (Squires, Bricker, & Twombly, 2015).
Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Parental symptoms of depression
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 6 months
Depression symptoms will be assessed with PHQ-9, which is a 9-item questionnaire to monitor the severity of depression symptoms (Kroenke, Sptizer & Williams, 2001).
Through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mette Væver, Phd, University of Copenhagen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 16, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Behavior Problems in Early Childhood

Clinical Trials on VIPP-SD

Subscribe