Study of Effectiveness and Safety of SD-101 in Participants With Epidermolysis Bullosa

January 7, 2020 updated by: Scioderm, Inc.

A Phase 2b, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of SD-101 Cream in Subjects With Epidermolysis Bullosa

The purpose of this study was to assess whether the topical use of SD-101 cream (3% or 6%) was effective in treating wounds in participants with Simplex, Recessive Dystrophic, or Junctional non-Herlitz Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a Phase 2b, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of SD-101 dermal cream (3% or 6%) on skin lesions in participants with Simplex, Recessive Dystrophic, or Junctional non-Herlitz EB.

SD-101 cream [containing 3% or 6% or vehicle (0%)] was applied topically, once a day to the entire body for a period of 90 days. Eligible participants had a target wound assessed at baseline. Selected target wound had to be at least a certain age and within a prespecified size range at study entry. Photographic confirmation of the target wound location was collected at baseline, and the picture saved from the first visit was used to confirm location of the target wound at subsequent visits. The participant returned to the study site at Week 2, Month 1, Month 4, and Month 5 (at 14, 30, 60, and 90 days, respectively) to have the target wound previously identified at baseline re-assessed for the level of healing. In addition, changes in itching, pain, body surface area coverage of blisters and lesions, and scaring of the healed target wound were also assessed at each visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27516
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78218
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed Consent form signed by the participant or the participant's legal representative; if the participant is under the age of majority but capable of providing assent, signed assent from the participant.
  • Participant (or caretaker) was willing to comply with all protocol requirements.
  • Diagnosis of Simplex, Recessive Dystrophic, or Junctional non-Herlitz EB.
  • Participants 6 months of age and older.
  • Participants had 1 target wound within a prespecified size range at study entry.
  • Target wound was at least 21 days or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who did not meet all the entry criteria outlined in inclusion criteria.
  • Selected target wound had clinical evidence of local infection.
  • Use of any investigational drug within 30 days before enrollment.
  • Use of immunotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy within 60 days before enrollment.
  • Use of systemic or topical steroidal therapy within 30 days before enrollment (inhaled steroids and ophthalmic drops containing steroids were allowed).
  • Use of systemic antibiotics within 7 days before enrollment.
  • Current or former malignancy.
  • Arterial or venous disorder resulting in ulcerated wounds.
  • Diabetes mellitus.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding during the study (a urine pregnancy test was performed at screening for female participants of childbearing potential).
  • Females of childbearing potential who were not abstinent and not practicing a medically acceptable method of contraception.
  • Known history of cardiac, hepatic, or renal disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SD-101 Dermal Cream (6%)
SD-101 dermal cream (6%) applied topically once daily over the entire body for 90 days.
SD-101 is a white, crystalline powder that is formulated within an odorless, soft, white cream base. SD-101-6.0 cream contains allantoin, a diureide glyoxylic acid, at a concentration of 6% and other excipients.
Other Names:
  • SD-101
  • Zorblisa
  • SD-101-6.0
Experimental: SD-101 Dermal Cream (3%)
SD-101 dermal cream (3%) applied topically once daily over the entire body for 90 days.
SD-101 is a white, crystalline powder that is formulated within an odorless, soft, white cream base. SD-101-3.0 cream contains allantoin, a diureide glyoxylic acid, at a concentration of 3% and other excipients.
Other Names:
  • SD-101
  • SD-101-3.0
  • Zorblisa
Placebo Comparator: Vehicle (0%)
Vehicle dermal cream (SD-101 0%) applied topically once daily over the entire body for 90 days.
A white, crystalline powder that is formulated within an odorless, soft, white cream base. It contains no allantoin, only excipients.
Other Names:
  • Placebo Comparator
  • SD-101-0.0

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants With Documented Complete Closure Of The Target Wound Within 1 Month After Initiation Of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to 1 Month
The ARANZ SilhouetteStar™, a wound imaging, measurement, and documentation system providing accurate wound assessment, was used to measure the target wound at all visits. Information captured included photographic images, quantitative measures, and other target wound assessment data input to the device by the clinician, all obtained with no contact to the participant's skin. Information about the target wound's measurement history was available on this system so that the serial progression of the target wound status could also be calculated and presented.
Baseline to 1 Month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Participants With Documented Complete Closure Of The Target Wound Within 2 And 3 Months After Initiation Of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 2 and Month 3
The ARANZ SilhouetteStar™, a wound imaging, measurement, and documentation system providing accurate wound assessment, was used to measure the target wound at all visits. Information captured included photographic images, quantitative measures, and other target wound assessment data input to the device by the clinician, all obtained with no contact to the participant's skin. Information about the target wound's measurement history was available on this system so that the serial progression of the target wound status could also be calculated and presented.
Baseline to Month 2 and Month 3
Percentage Change From Baseline In Lesional Skin Based On Body Surface Area Index (BSAI) Measurements At Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3
The BSAI is a global measure of disease "spread" with weighting factors. Lesional skin consisted of area(s) that could contain any of the following: blisters, bullae, erosions, ulcerations, scabbing and eschars, as well as areas that are weeping, sloughing, oozing, crusted and denuded. The percentage, ranging from 0% to 100%, of affected body surface area was recorded for each defined body region (head/neck, upper limbs, trunk [includes groin], and lower limbs), multiplied by the weighting factor, and then summed for all body regions to calculate the BSAI. The BSAI affected with blisters and wounds was calculated at baseline and Month 3 to assess the total affected area. Percentage change from baseline was calculated as follows: Percentage change from baseline = 100*(Post-baseline value minus Baseline value) divided by Baseline value. Mean percentage change from baseline in BSAI is reported. Only participants with data available for analysis at the specified time point are presented.
Baseline, Month 3
Participants Experiencing A Change From Baseline In Itching At Day 7
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7
The Itch Man Pruritus Assessment Tool was used to measure the intensity of itching. Itching was assessed and reported at Baseline and Day 7. For participants 6 months to 5 years of age, itching was assessed using the caretaker's response, while in participants 6 years and older, itching was self-reported.
Baseline, Day 7
Change From Baseline In Pain At Day 7
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 7
Pain was assessed at Baseline and Day 7. The presence and intensity of pain was assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Pain Scale for participants 6 months to 3 years of age. For participants aged 4 years and older, the Wong Faces Pain Scale was used. Scores were attributed for each of the 5 categories in the FLACC scale from 0 to 2, which resulted in a total score between 0 and 10. The Wong Faces Pain scale used 1 item to rate pain on a 0 to 10 scale. Higher score values indicated more pain.
Baseline, Day 7
Participants With Scarring At Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, And Month 3
Time Frame: Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3
In the event of a healed wound, where complete closure was confirmed, the extent of scarring was assessed as "Present" or "Absent" at all post-baseline visits (Week 2 and Months 1, 2, and 3).
Week 2, Month 1, Month 2, and Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epidermolysis Bullosa

Clinical Trials on SD-101 Dermal Cream (6%)

Subscribe