QUantitative Flow Ratio Or Angiography for the assessMent of nOn-culprit Lesions (QUOMODO)

October 6, 2024 updated by: Tommaso Gori, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz

The aim of this study is to study whether the use of complex 3-dimensional assessment of the severity of a stenosis improves angina and in general cardiovascular outcomes in patients who have residual intermediate coronary artery stenosis following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Goals of the study are:

  • To investigate whether decision-making based on quantitative flow reserve (QFR) is associated with a decrease in angina 3 months after an ACS
  • To investigate whether use of QFR is associated with an improved prognosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is a single-center, randomized superiority trial to compare two strategies for the assessment of the hemodynamic relevance of coronary lesions.

The primary analysis will be on the per-protocol principle (i.e. including all patients who are not protocol violators). A separate analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis (i.e. all randomized patients randomized to a treatment arm).

Primary endpoint 1. Angina questionnaire

Secondary endpoints:

Number and % of patients undergoing PCI

Seattle Angina Questionnaire

  • SAQ Physical limitation scale
  • SAQ angina stability scale
  • SAQ angina frequency scale
  • SAQ quality of life
  • SAQ Treatment Satisfaction Disease perception scale Follow-up (3 and 12 months) - Patient-oriented composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization) and its components.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rheinland-Pfalz
      • Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany, 55131
        • Center of Cardiology, Cardiology I, university hospital Mainz

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Successfully treated acute coronary syndrome
  • At least one additional intermediate stenosis (>30% and <90%).
  • Patient ≥18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stenoses or patients a priori not amenable to treatment with PCI (at the discretion of two interventional cardiologists - e.g. patients with limited life expectancy, stenosis in very small vessels, very diffuse disease with complex/very calcified stenosis requiring surgery etc).
  • Persistent symptoms or evidence of ischemia requiring intervention of the non-culprit lesion.
  • Any contraindication to PCI according to guidelines
  • An ACS in the period following the index ACS and randomization
  • TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) flow grade < 3 in the culprit vessel
  • Presence of thrombus in the non-culprit lesion
  • Participation in another randomized interventional study interfering with the present protocol
  • Patient unable to give informed consent
  • Women of child-bearing potential or lactating
  • Previous coronary artery bypass surgery CABG
  • Recent (within 30 days) unsuccessful PCI
  • Decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF) or hospitalization due to CHF during the last 3 months
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  • Severe valvular heart disease
  • FFR (or RFR, iFR etc) assessment of non-culprit lesions at the time of the index procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Angiography
The indication to further coronary intervention will be based on angiographic diameter stenosis.
The indication to coronary stent intervention will be based on angiography
Experimental: Quantitative flow ratio (QFR)
The indication to further coronary intervention will be based on QFR.
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a computer method that estimates the hemodynamic relevance of a coronary stenosis based on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D QCA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-oriented combined endpoint (clinical endpoint)
Time Frame: 12 months
composite of patient-oriented events and significant angina (all-cause death, non fatal myocardial infarction including type 1, 2, 4, unplanned hospitalization for angina or heart failure, unplanned revascularization, SAQ<90)
12 months
Functional endpoint
Time Frame: Upon randomization and following QFR assessment
Proportion of patients assigned to medical treatment in the two groups (QFR vs. Reference)
Upon randomization and following QFR assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-oriented composite endpoint
Time Frame: 3 months
Patient-oriented composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization).
3 months
Patient-oriented composite endpoint
Time Frame: 12 months
Patient-oriented composite endpoint (death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization).
12 months
Seattle angina questionaire summary score
Time Frame: 12 months
Angina severity as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ, score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life))
12 months
Seattle angina questionaire summary score
Time Frame: 3 months
Angina severity as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ, score of 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better function (eg, less physical limitation, less angina, and better quality of life))
3 months
Unplanned admission
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of unplanned hospital admission for angina
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Assessment of angiographic severity of the stenosis

Subscribe