The Use of Biorepair Peribioma Toothpaste and Mousse for Home Oral Care in Patients Undergoing Periodontal Therapy

December 23, 2021 updated by: Andrea Scribante, University of Pavia

A Comparison Between Biorepair Peribioma Toothpaste and Mousse Versus Chlorhexidine 0,2% Toothpaste (Curasept Trattamento Rigenerante) for Domiciliary Oral Care in Periodontal Patients.

This is a split-mouth randomized clinical trial in which a new domiciliary oral care protocol with Biorepair Peribioma Toothpaste and Mousse is evaluated in periodontal patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a split-mouth randomized clinical trial that aims to suggest an innovative protocol for domiciliary oral care of periodontal patients. In details, home use of Biorepair Peribioma Toothpaste and Mousse is proposed as a support of professional hygiene sessions.

Patients that respond to the eligibility criteria and that sign the informed consent are recruited for periodontal therapy.The first professional hygiene session is performed at the baseline (T0); the following ones will be performed after 3 (T1) and 6 months (T2) from the baseline. In each session, periodontal indices of inflammation are detected; then, subgingival removal of plaque and tartar is performed, followed by glycine air-flow application in periodontal pockets. A microbiological test is perfomed in order to detect red and orange complex bacteria. At this time, patients are randomly allocated into two groups:

  • Trial Group: domiciliary oral hygiene with Biorepair Peribioma Toothpaste and Mousse twice a day until T2 session.
  • Control Group: home oral hygiene with Curasept Toothpaste (0,2% Chlorhexidine) twice a day until T2 session.

At the end of T1 and T2 professional session, a satisfaction survey about Peribioma Toothpaste and Mousse will ben given to the patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Lombardy
      • Pavia, Lombardy, Italy, 27100
        • Unit of Dental Hygiene - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatrics - University of Pavia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of periodontal disease according to the recent 2017 classification (2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions): severity grade II-III and complexity grade I-II.
  • Presence of bilateral periodontal probes, for at least one tooth per side up to 20 elements with pathologic probes).
  • Patients' good compliance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cardiac pacemaker
  • Patients suffering from neurological disorders
  • Patients suffering from psychological disorders
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Trial Group - Biorepair Peribioma Toothpaste + Mousse
Domiciliary oral hygiene with Biorepair Peribioma Toothpaste in association with Peribioma Mousse twice a day until T2 session.
Patients will use Biorepair Peribioma Toothpaste and Mousse for domiciliary oral hygiene twice a day until T2 session.
Active Comparator: Control Group - Curasept Toothpaste (chlorhexidine 0,2%)
Domiciliary oral care with Curasept Toothpaste (chlorhexidine 0,2%) twice a day until T2 session.
Patients will use Curasept Toothpaste (chlorhexidine 0,2%) for domiciliary oral hygiene twice a day until T2 session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in BOP - Bleeding on Probing (percentage)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.

Site-specific assessment of the presence or absence of gum bleeding after the insertion of the periodontal probe for the detection of PPD, detected on 6 sites.

Percentage of sites with bleeding on probing determines the BOP%.

3 and 6 months.
Change in BS - Bleeding Score
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.

Scoring criteria:

  • 0 = no bleeding;
  • 1 = punctiform bleeding in the site of probing;
  • 2 = slightly extended bleeding in the site of probing;
  • 3 = bleeding in more than a half of gingival margin;
  • 4 = gingival border fully covered by blood.
3 and 6 months.
Change in SBI - Sulculus Bleeding Index (Muhulemann and Son, 1781)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.

Scoring criteria:

  • 0 = healthy looking papillary and marginal gingiva, no bleeding on probing;
  • 1 = healthy looking gingiva, with bleeding on probing;
  • 2 = bleeding on probing, change in color, no edema;
  • 3 = bleeding on probing, change in color, slight edema;
  • 4 = bleeding on probing, change in color, obvious edema;
  • 5 = spontaneous bleeding, change in color, marked edema.
3 and 6 months.
Change in GI - Gingival Index (Loe and Silness, 1963)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.

Scoring criteria:

  • 0 = normal gingiva.
  • 1 = mild inflammation, edema and swelling; no bleeding.
  • 2 = moderate inflammation with edema, swelling and bleeding on probing.
  • 3 = severe inflammation with marked edema, redness tissues, ulceration and spontaneous bleeding.
3 and 6 months.
Change in PPD - Probing Pocket Depth
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.
Evaluation (in mm) of the depth of the gingival sulcus, through a millimeter periodontal probe; it is detected from the gingival margin to the bottom of the gingival sulcus or periodontal pocket, evaluated at 6 sites.
3 and 6 months.
Change in CAL - Clinical Attachment Loss
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.
Measurement (in mm) of the position of the gingival margin in relation to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ).
3 and 6 months.
Change in Percentage of pathological sites
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.
Evaluation of the presence of pathological probes expressed as a percentage.
3 and 6 months.
Change in R - Gingival recession
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.
Distance (in mm) between the gingival margin and the amelo-cemental junction.
3 and 6 months.
Change in PI - Plaque Index (Silness and Löe, 1964)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.

Scoring criteria:

  • 0 = no plaque;
  • 1 = thin plaque layer at the gingival margin, only detectable by scraping with a probe;
  • 2 = moderate layer of plaque along the gingival margin; interdental spaces free, but plaque is visible to the naked eye;
  • 3 = abundant plaque along the gingival margin; interdental spaces filled with plaque.
3 and 6 months.
Change in Evaluation of the total height of the adherent gingiva
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.
Evaluation (in mm) of the total height of adherent gingiva.
3 and 6 months.
Change in API - Approximal Plaque Index (Lange, 1986)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months.
Following application of disclosing, a simple yes/no decision is made concerning whether the interproximal surfaces are covered by plaque (+) or not (-). The proportion of plaque-covered interproximal spaces is expressed as a percentage. Usually, in a given quadrant the interproximal spaces are scored from only one aspect (i.e. from the facial - Q2 and Q4 - or from the oral aspect - Q1 and Q3).
3 and 6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 29, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Data will be available upon motivated request to Principal Investigator.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontal Diseases

3
Subscribe