Assessing Adherence to Digital Health Technologies Among Hispanic/Latino Adults With or At Risk of Type 2 Diabetes:

October 25, 2022 updated by: Sansum Diabetes Research Institute

Assessing Adherence to Digital Health Technologies Among Hispanic/Latino Adults With or At Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Feasibility Study

In an effort to personalize medical care, novel approaches have been used to categorize sub-populations of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). These are based on biological and genetic variables, allowing identification of clusters with significantly different clinical characteristics and risks of complications that may be more amenable to targeted and precise therapeutic interventions. Increasingly, wearable and other digital health technologies have the potential to capture additional and objective information to support personalized medicine but at present underserved populations have largely been excluded from clinical trials incorporating digital health.

With this study, the Investigators aim to build on prior work using specially trained community health workers ("Community Scientists") to support engagement with an underserved population and to encourage adherence to using wearables and other digital health technologies. In the US, this is especially imperative for the Hispanic/Latino population, which is at high risk for T2D and associated complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

As treatment choices for type 2 diabetes (T2D) evolve from a one-size-fits-all approach into a patient-centered precision medicine model, there is a need for a deeper understanding of the clinically meaningful differences between individuals to inform therapy choice.

Recently there have been new approaches to creating sub-groups of populations with T2D based on biological, psychosocial, and genetic variables which have identified clusters of patients with significantly different clinical characteristics and risk of associated complications. By incorporating personal, wearable digital health technologies, it will become possible to further refine such stratification through the inclusion of additional variables and advances in big data analytics and machine learning. The vision is that identifying sub-groups at high risk of complications early in the course of T2D will help clinicians to offer more effective personalized therapies.

In the US, the prevalence of both diagnosed and undiagnosed T2D is nearly twice as high among Mexican-origin Hispanic/Latino adults compared to non-Hispanic whites. Rates of diabetes-related complications are also higher among Hispanic/Latino adults. T2D is also associated with a high burden of depression. There are independent barriers to the treatment of depression in the Hispanic/Latino population, and a population with comorbid depression and T2D could represent a distinct endophenotype requiring modified treatment plans that address common pathophysiological pathways linking both diseases. Of particular interest is the common presence of anxiety symptoms that can worsen depression prognosis and muddle the diagnostic picture. For this purpose, and to elucidate better endophenotypes in our study, attention will be paid to anxious distress, a specifier of major depressive disorder that could potentially be very pertinent to this population, and bring about somatic complaints, insomnia, and irritability.

Although wearable technologies for self-monitoring such as continuous glucose monitors (CGM) are used in diabetes care, the overwhelming experience has been in type 1 diabetes and insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. There is much less use in individuals with non-insulin treated T2D or those at risk of diabetes. Across all forms of diabetes, minority use of CGM has been consistently and markedly less than in the general population with diabetes.

Diet plays a crucial role in the management of T2D. To design personalized dietary recommendations, it is vital to understand an individual's food behaviors. Mobile health platforms present the opportunity to collect detailed information regarding daily food choices. In this study, data collected through daily food logging and ecological momentary assessment (EMA) on hunger, satisfaction, and satiety will be used to quantify and understand the individual's dietary behaviors and glycemic outcomes.

To summarize the rationale behind this study, developments in precision medicine have allowed for the categorization of individuals with T2D into sub-groups that may be amenable to different therapeutic strategies. However, there is also a need to better understand the impact of behavioral and psychological factors on the risk of progression of T2D and responses to existing and new therapies, especially in the context of development of depressive symptomatology. These may be especially relevant for US minorities, such as Hispanic/Latino adults who have an excess burden of T2D and the associated complications compared to non-Hispanic whites. Digital health has the potential to be of enormous value provided it is acceptable and will be used by underserved communities.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Santa Barbara, California, United States, 93105
        • Sansum Diabetes Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Hispanic/Latino adults with or at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes and who currently use a compatible smartphone will be enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1.
  2. Self-reported Hispanic/Latino heritage.
  3. Self-reported diagnosis of type 2 diabetes OR self-reported as at risk for developing type 2 diabetes OR healthy individuals who are not at-risk or have diabetes (healthy controls).
  4. Based on staff's judgment, the subject must have a good understanding, ability, and willingness to adhere to the protocol and to participate in the video-recording part of the study.
  5. Exclusive and continuous use, for the 2 week participation period, of a study-compatible smartphone.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently taking insulin as treatment for diabetes.
  2. Pregnant.
  3. Any active clinically significant disease or disorder, which in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the participation in the trial.
  4. Mental incapacity, psychiatric disorder, unwillingness or language barriers precluding comprehension of study activities and informed consent.
  5. Current participation in other trials involving medications or devices.
  6. Meets criteria for substance use disorders as defined by DSM-5 (e.g., abuse of alcohol, narcotics, or illicit drugs).
  7. Self-reported diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia or antisocial personality disorder.
  8. At high risk for suicide based on staff judgement.
  9. Neuromuscular disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to wearing continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices to measure glucose levels.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of time and percent of days CGM is active during the study period.
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence to wearing ActiGraph to measure physical activity and sleep.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of time and percent of days ActiGraph is active during the study period.
2 weeks
Adherence to wearing Fitbit to measure physical activity and sleep.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of time and percent of days Fitbit is active during the study period.
2 weeks
Adherence to using the HealthSense app to capture food intake data.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of days HealthSense app is active during the study period.
2 weeks
Adherence to using the MyFitnessPal app to capture food intake data.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of days MyFitnessPal app is active during the study period.
2 weeks
Feasibility of measuring glycemic impact of meal quantity and composition using CGMs.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of participants from whom data are captured on glucose levels AND food intake.
2 weeks
Feasibility of measuring the behavioral impact of meal quantity and composition using food logs and ecological momentary assessment of hunger, satisfaction and satiety.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of participants from whom data are captured on food intake AND hunger, satisfaction and satiety.
2 weeks
Feasibility of assessing depression and anxiety symptoms objectively based on video-recording of the participants.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of participants from whom data are captured via video-recording on psychological status (depression and anxiety).
2 weeks
Feasibility of assessing the prevalence of depression and anxiety with a focus on culturally-specific presentations of distress.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of participants from whom data are captured on psychological status (depression and anxiety) AND ethnicity.
2 weeks
Feasibility of assessing the comorbidity of depressive/anxiety symptoms and type 2 diabetes and the impact of depression and anxiety on diet-medication adherence and lifestyle choices.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Unit of measure: Percent of participants from whom data are captured on depressive/anxiety symptoms AND diabetes status AND diet-medication adherence AND lifestyle choices.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Kerr, MD, Sansum Diabetes Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 9, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Subscribe