Wear-Time Trial for Self-Fitting Hearing Aid

April 18, 2022 updated by: GN Hearing A/S

Protocol for Self-Fitting Hearing Aid Wear-Time Trial for Listeners With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss

This document describes a clinical validation study for a double-blind repeated-measures comparative study of the Great Nordic (GN) self-fitting method to a validated audiology-best-practices method when fitting the GN Self-fitting Hearing Aid, a device intended for persons aged 18-75 years old who have mild-to-moderate hearing loss. A crossover wear-time field trial will be conducted. The focus of the study is on the validity of the self-fitting process used to select appropriate frequency-gain characteristics for the GN Self-fitting Hearing Aid, and the safety and effectiveness of the device.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Palos Hills, Illinois, United States, 60465
        • Sertoma Speech and Hearing Center
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37235
        • Vanderbilt University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Mild-to-moderate bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (thresholds from 250 - 8000 Hz less than 60 decibels Hearing Level (dB HL) and from 2000 - 8000 Hz, at least one threshold greater than 20 dB HL)
  • Mix of male and female subjects (aiming for a representative balance)
  • Mix of prior hearing-aid use (aiming for 70-80% persons with no prior hearing aid use)
  • 18-75 years old (aiming for primarily 50-70 years old, with avg. age ~65 years)
  • Apple iPhone (iOS 14 compatible or greater, as required for the SELF-FIT app)
  • Able to read and comprehend English
  • Patient willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hearing outside of limits noted above
  • Self-reported ear-related pathology (including chronic severe dizziness or chronic severe tinnitus)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Pro-Fit followed by Self Fit
Hearing aids fit by a professional hearing care provider using best practices followed by patient ...
Earbud style hearing aids fit to both ears
EXPERIMENTAL: Self-Fit followed by ProFit
Hearing aids fit by patient followed by ...
Earbud style hearing aids fit to both ears

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aided Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)
Time Frame: 10-14 days
The APHAB is a 24-item self-assessment of the amount of trouble the respondent has with communication in everyday situations. Sample question: "When I'm at the dinner table with several people, and I am trying to have a conversation with one person, understanding speech is difficult." For each of the 24 items, person asked to select one of the following percentages to indicate how frequently this occurs: Always (99%); Almost Always (87%); Generally (75%); Half-the-time (50%); Occasionally (25%); Seldom (12%); or Never (1%). Mean scale scores are expressed as a percentage or proportion representing the average frequency of difficulty experienced. An APHAB global score based on the 18 items from the three speech-communication subscales was used in the statistical analyses. APHAB scores were obtained unaided (Visit 1) and following use of the hearing aids for 10-14 days for each fit (Visits 2 & 3; aided). The primary outcome is the mean difference in aided scores, Self-Fit minus Pro-Fit.
10-14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quick Speech in Noise Test (QuickSIN)
Time Frame: Measurement after 10-14-day wear time for each fit.
The QuickSIN test consists of lists of six sentences played from a loudspeaker at a constant level approximating typical conversation. The level of the co-located four-talker babble (background noise) increased across the six sentences for signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) ranging from +25 to 0 decibels (dB) SNR (in steps of 5 dB). The participant was asked to repeat each sentence. The examiner scored predetermined key words in each sentence. The resulting score was interpreted as an SNR loss in dB where a value near 0 dB indicates normal hearing and larger values indicate more difficulty listening in noise. The QuickSIN SNR values for the Pro-Fit condition were subtracted from those for the Self-Fit condition to generate a difference value in dB between the two fitting methods. The secondary outcome measure evaluated here was the mean difference in QuickSIN SNR values in dB between Pro-Fit and Self-Fit for all 37 participants; 19 Pro-Fit first and 18 Self-Fit first.
Measurement after 10-14-day wear time for each fit.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Todd Ricketts, Ph.D., Vanderbilt University
  • Principal Investigator: Sumitrajit Dhar, Ph.D., Northwestern University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 18, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Clinical Trials on Hearing aids

3
Subscribe