Safety and Clinical Performance Study of the ARTUS® Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) (DRY)

September 14, 2022 updated by: Myopowers Medical Technologies France SAS

Safety and Clinical Performance Study of the ARTUS® Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) Due to Intrinsic Sphincter Deficiency

This clinical investigation is designed as an interventional, prospective, non-randomized, open-label, single arm, multicentric and international study for obtaining CE marking.

The study will be the first performed with the ARTUS® medical device aiming to assess safety and performance and will be composed of three phases:

  • pilot phase (with safety analysis on the 10 first included subjects in 3 investigational sites),
  • pivotal phase (in up to 16 investigational sites with a follow-up until the 12-month post-device activation visit, including an interim analysis at 3-month post-device activation visit on performance and safety),
  • long-term phase (with a long-term follow-up until 10 years post implantation in up to 16 investigational sites).

The objectives is to assess safety and clinical performance of the ARTUS® for the treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence at short and long-term.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Prague, Czechia
        • Thomayer Hospital
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
    • Badalona
      • Barcelona, Badalona, Spain, 08916

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male subject between 18 and 80 years (inclusive) of age at the time of consent signature
  2. Subject with persistent urinary incontinence, defined as >12 months
  3. Subject with severe Stress Urinary Incontinence, defined as a mean value of 3 consecutive 24-hour Pad Weight Test > 75 grams
  4. Subject willing and able to provide written informed consent
  5. Subject willing and able to comply with all clinical study requirements, including the ability to independently operate the device remote control
  6. Subject willing and able to comply with follow-up visits
  7. Subject having understood and accepted to be unable to proceed to an MRI examination after the surgical procedure due to the non-MRI compatibility of the device
  8. Subject having signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject with documented neurological bladder or history of neurological disease liable to interfere with urinary symptoms
  2. Subject with history of Artificial Urinary Sphincter or male sling implantation
  3. Subject with history of pelvic radiotherapy
  4. Subject with history of Artificial Urinary Sphincter-related urethral erosion
  5. Subject with history of urethral fistula
  6. Subject with history of bladder tumour
  7. Subject with severe urethral stenosis
  8. Subject with urge incontinence due to hyperactive bladder not adequately controlled by drug therapy
  9. Subject with severe congenital or acquired haemorrhagic disease, haemophilia, or another coagulopathy
  10. Subject under anti-coagulation or anti-platelet medication that cannot be discontinued at least 5 days prior to surgery and restarted at least 5 days after surgery
  11. Subject with currently active infection, including urinary tract infection
  12. Subject with severe renal failure or obstructive pathologies of the upper urinary tract with severe renal failure
  13. Subject with a current vesicourethral reflux
  14. Subject with congenital or acquired immunodeficiency, including those who are immunocompromised or immunosuppressed
  15. Subject with bladder or urethral foreign body or calculus
  16. Subject with allergy to any components of the device
  17. Subject deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision or under legal guardianship
  18. Subject having a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40
  19. Subject with post void residual volume greater than 200 mL, within the past 6 months
  20. Subject with uncontrolled diabetes, defined as HbA1c > 9.0%, within the past 6 months
  21. Subject with history of recurrent bladder stones or history of failed bladder stone treatment within the past 12 months
  22. Subject currently enrolled or plans to participate in another investigational study of a drug, biologic, or medical device from the point of enrolment through the 12 months post device activation period
  23. Subject who underwent any surgical procedure in the last 3 months, or with planned surgical procedure within the next 3 months
  24. Subject who is unwilling or deemed by the Investigator to be unwilling to comply with the Clinical Investigation Plan, or subject with a history of non-compliance
  25. Subject unable to understand and sign the ICF in absence of legal representative
  26. Subject with a lack of capacity to consent
  27. Subject unable to read and write
  28. Subject in emergency situation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: ARTUS®
The subjects will be implanted with the experimental medical device ARTUS® Artificial Urinary Sphincter (AUS) during the surgical procedure and will be trained to the use of the Remote Control to control themselves the micturition.

Device preparation (recharge, settings, pairing) Patient preparation Calibration procedure (to verify the device is in full working prior to implantation)

Implantation procedure which includes:

  • Perineal approach and bulbar urethral dissection
  • Inguinal approach
  • Cuff implantation around the urethra
  • Transmission cable passing
  • Surgery test procedure
  • Implantation of the Control Unit
  • Closure of the inguinal incision
  • Closure of the perineal incision
  • "Implant disabled mode" activation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the 24-hour Pad Weight Test
Time Frame: 3 months post-device activation
Proportion of subjects with at least 50% reduction in 24-hour Pad Weight Test at 3 months post-device activation compared to baseline.
3 months post-device activation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse events (including adverse device effect) occurred from the implantation to the 10-year follow-up period
Time Frame: Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op

All adverse events (including adverse device effect) occurred from the implantation to the 10-year follow-up period, with their occurrence, severity and nature.

All adverse events will be analysed and classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification grading system

Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Revision rate
Time Frame: Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Proportion of subjects who have been concerned with a revision between the implantation and each visit (or scheduled visit date), until the 10-year follow-up period
Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Explantation rate
Time Frame: Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Proportion of subjects who have been concerned with an explantation of the medical device between the implantation and each visit (or scheduled visit date), until the 10-year follow-up period
Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Renal function
Time Frame: Baseline, Implantation, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Assessed using the serum creatinine
Baseline, Implantation, discharge, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Pain assessed by numeric rating scale
Time Frame: Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Pain assessed using a 10-point numeric rating scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable
Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Voided urine assessed with uroflowmetry
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Voided urine assessed with uroflowmetry per unit of time (mL/s)
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Voided volume assessed with uroflowmetry
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Voided volume assessed with uroflowmetry in mL and maximum flow rate (Qmax)
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Maximum flow rate assessed with uroflowmetry
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Maximum flow rate assessed with uroflowmetry (Qmax)
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Bladder drainage
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Assessed using post-void residual volume
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Usability assessed by a 5-point scale
Time Frame: Implantation
Usability assessed by a 5-point scale from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree)
Implantation
Device deficiencies occurred from the implantation to the 10-year follow-up period
Time Frame: Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Device deficiencies occurred from the implantation to the 10-year follow-up period with their occurrence and nature.
Implantation, 6 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months post-op, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months post-device activation, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Change in the 24-hour Pad Weight Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation
24-hour Pad Weight Test
Baseline, 3, 6 and 12-month post-device activation
Reduction in the 24-hour Pad Weight Test
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 and 12-month post-device activation
Proportion of subjects with at least 50% reduction in 24-hour Pad Weight Test
Baseline, 6 and 12-month post-device activation
Pad Usage
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit,2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Number of pads/day
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit,2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Urinary symptoms assessed with ICIQ-MLUTS subscales
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op

Urinary symptoms assessed with ICIQ-MLUTS subscales :

  • Voiding symptoms subscales from 0 (no symptom) to 20
  • Incontincence symptoms subscales from 0 (no symptom) to 24
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Urinary incontinence Quality of Life assessed with ICIQ-LUTSQoL questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Urinary incontinence Quality of Life assessed with ICIQ-LUTSQoL questionnaire score from 19 to 76 with greater values indicating increased impact on quality of life
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
General Quality of Life assessed with EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op

The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS).

The descriptive system comprises five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) of 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.

The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement.

Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Sexual Quality of Life assessed with the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire (MHSQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op

The MSHQ is a 25-item self-administered questionnaire. It encompasses 3 scales: Erection scale (3 items), Ejaculation scale (7 items), Satisfaction scale (6 items), and 9 additional items addressing sexual activity, time since last sexual encounter, level and changes in sexual activity, and bother associated with sexual dysfunction. Response options consist of dichotomous (Yes/No) scales, as well as 5 and 6- point likert scales.

Scores by dimension:

  • Erection scale: 0-15 (higher score =higher sexual functioning)
  • Ejaculation scale: 1-35 (higher score =higher sexual functioning)
  • Satisfaction scale: 6-30 (higher score =higher level of satisfaction)
Baseline, 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Subject usability assessed by a 5-point scale
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Subject usability questionnaire completed by the subject from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree)
3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Subject satisfaction assessed by the PGI-I
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Subject satisfaction assessed by the PGI-I questionnaire which includes a unique 7-point scale to describe how the post-operative condition is now, compared with how it was before the surgery and where 1 = Very much better and 7 = very much worse
3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Subject satisfaction assessed by 5-point scale
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Subject satisfaction assessed by the question "Are you satisfied with the use of ARTUS" with the 5-point scale answers where 1 = strongly agree and 5 = Strongly disagree
3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Subject recommendation assessed by 5-point scale
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Subject recommendation assessed by the question "Would you recommend ARTUS to a friend" with the 5-point scale answers where 1 = strongly agree and 5 = Strongly disagree
3, 6, and 12-month post-device activation visit, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years, 6 years, 7 years, 8 years, 9 years, 10 years post-op
Investigator usability assessed by a 5-point scale
Time Frame: Device activation visit (6 weeks post-operative visit), 3 months post-device activation
Investigator usability questionnaire completed by the investigator from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree)
Device activation visit (6 weeks post-operative visit), 3 months post-device activation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Roman Zachoval, Pr, Thomayerova nemocnice
  • Study Director: Marion Melot, Myopowers Medical Technologies France SAS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Artificial Urinary Sphincter implantation

3
Subscribe