Efficacy of FES Cycling After a Severe Form of COVID-19 (FESrehabCoV)

December 13, 2025 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Efficacy of Physical Therapy Using Cycling With vs With no Functional Electrical Stimulation in Patient With Severe Form of COVID-19: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affect at late march 2021 more than 127 millions of persons worldwide (including more than 4.5 millions in France, according to John Hopkins University https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html, consulted 2021/3/25). Among these persons, 17% of the confirmed cases the COVID-19 develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (Chen et al., 2020), requiring an hospitalization in intensive care unit with mechanical ventilation for prolonged periods (in median up to 21 days whereas 3.3 is the usual mean length of stay). This prolonged period of inactivity causes dramatical muscles and cardio-respiratory losses. These patients experience a dramatical decrease in the physical ability which is reinforce by the protective isolation measures and containment to prevent the further spread of the virus.

Rehabilitation of patients with a severe form of the COVID-19 faced new challenges due to the novelty of the disease and protective isolation measures to prevent the further spread of the virus. Rehabilitation target a recovery of the cardio-respiratory, muscle deficits and improvement in activity. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is one innovative technique, among other. FES have been shown as effective to improve the respiratory function in patients with a severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Acheche et al., 2020; Maddocks et al., 2016), reduce the muscle loss due to zero gravity in space for astronauts (Maffiuletti et al., 2019), or increase strength in persons with incomplete spinal cord injury (de Freitas et al., 2018). FES has been recently delivered during cycling to restore pedaling movements with an adequate rhythm of muscle contraction. To date, FES cycling has been successfully administered in patients with spinal cord injury, and has been shown to be more effective in patient with severe COPD for improving the exercising intensity; reducing fatigue and improving quality of life in persons with multiple sclerosis (Backus et al., 2020).

In a pilot study, we shown that 4 week of physical therapy incluing FES cycling resulted in a fasten recovery of active postures as compared to physical therapy including cycling alone. (Mateo et al., under revision). Therefore, we hypothesize that a 4-week period of rehabilitation based on physical therapy with FES cycling would result in a significantly increase of activity profile (decrease in inactive posture duration) in patient with a severe form of COVID-19 (i.e., with an ARDS requiring mechanical ventilation).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Saint-Genis-Laval, France, 69230
        • Hôpital Henry Gabrielle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Being hospitalized for rehabilitation because of a severe form of the COVID-19 that required an admission in intensive care unit for acute distress respiratory syndrome treated by mechanical ventilation.
  • Being beneficiary of the French social security.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person requiring supplementation in oxygen > 4 L/min because above this threshold, the oxygen flow is considered to be associated with an increased risk of aerosolization and further virus spread in patient being contagious;
  • Oxygen desaturation during exercise (i.e., SpO2 < 90%) and requiring supplementation in oxygen > 4 L/min.
  • Person showing a lower motor neuron disease as defined by the medical research council score < 48/60 including hyporeflexia (quadricipital and triceps tendons) and decrease in lower limb sensation.
  • Persons showing denervated muscle (including quadriceps, hamstring, gluteus and triceps) confirmed by electromyography because the electrical stimulations delivered by the stimulator (i.e., symmetric and rectangular biphasic currents) are not appropriate to restore a pedaling movement;
  • Person with osteo-articular disease at lower limbs including reduction in range of motion at the hip, knee and ankle preventing cycling pedaling in a sitting position;
  • Persons with associated neurologic or psychiatric disease;
  • Person with a medical contraindication to intensive rehabilitation;
  • Person suffering from suspected or diagnosed epilepsy;
  • Person with an implanted device;
  • Person included in another ongoing research or during an exclusion period of another research;
  • Adults protected by law (guardianship or curatorship);
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cycling rehabilitation with functional electrical stimulation
Immediately after the discharge of the intensive care unit, patient with a severe form of the COVID-19 will be admitted in the rehabilitation hospital. Rehabilitation will consist in physical therapy twice a day, 30 minutes, 5 days a week. One session will be dedicated to a standardized cycling training (TECHNOGYM RECLINE EXCITE 700). All participants will follow the same 4-week rehabilitation protocol representing a total of 1200 minutes. Participants randomized in the experimental group will received functional electrical stimulation administered to surface electrodes attached to lower limb muscles (quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteus maximus and triceps). Electrical stimulation will be delivered appropriately to the muscle during cycling regarding the angle of the pedal by a stimulator (Motimove-8 de 3Fit Fabricando Faber).
Active Comparator: Cycling rehabilitation
Immediately after the discharge of the intensive care unit, patient with a severe form of the COVID-19 will be admitted in the rehabilitation hospital. Rehabilitation will consist in physical therapy twice a day, 30 minutes, 5 days a week. One session will be dedicated to a standardized cycling training (TECHNOGYM RECLINE EXCITE 700). All participants will follow the same 4-week rehabilitation protocol representing a total of 1200 minutes. Participants randomized in the control group will received no additional functional electrical stimulation during cycling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in daily duration in sedentary posture between week 1 of rehabilitation (start) and week 4 of rehabilitation (end).
Time Frame: 48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) during week 1 of rehabilitation (start) and week 4 of rehabilitation (end).
The duration in sedentary posture will be measured by an accelerometer (Actigraph, wGT3X, Pensacola, USA) worn at the belt on the right hip as recommended (Garnotel et al., 2018). The accelerometer is worn continously for 48 hours (i.e., from 00 to 24 hours). The Actilife ® software (current version 6) will be used to analyzed the data recorded by the accelerometer.
48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) during week 1 of rehabilitation (start) and week 4 of rehabilitation (end).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily duration in sedentary posture
Time Frame: 48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
The duration in sedentary posture will be measured by an accelerometer (Actigraph, wGT3X, Pensacola, USA) worn at the belt on the right hip as recommended (Garnotel et al., 2018). The accelerometer is worn continously for 48 hours (i.e., from 00 to 24 hours). The Actilife ® software (current version 6) will be used to analyzed the data recorded by the accelerometer.
48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Daily duration in standing posture.
Time Frame: 48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
The duration in standing posture will be measured by an accelerometer (Actigraph, wGT3X, Pensacola, USA) worn at the belt on the right hip as recommended (Garnotel et al., 2018). The accelerometer is worn continously for 48 hours (i.e., from 00 to 24 hours). The Actilife ® software (current version 6) will be used to analyzed the data recorded by the accelerometer.
48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Daily duration in walking/running activities.
Time Frame: 48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
The duration in walking/running activities will be measured by an accelerometer (Actigraph, wGT3X, Pensacola, USA) worn at the belt on the right hip as recommended (Garnotel et al., 2018). The accelerometer is worn continously for 48 hours (i.e., from 00 to 24 hours). The Actilife ® software (current version 6) will be used to analyzed the data recorded by the accelerometer.
48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Daily duration in light intensity levels.
Time Frame: 48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
The duration in light intensity levels will be measured by an accelerometer (Actigraph, wGT3X, Pensacola, USA) worn at the belt on the right hip as recommended (Garnotel et al., 2018). The accelerometer is worn continously for 48 hours (i.e., from 00 to 24 hours). The Actilife ® software (current version 6) will be used to analyzed the data recorded by the accelerometer accordingly based on the activity counts determined by Freedson et al., (1998).
48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Daily duration in moderate intensity levels.
Time Frame: 48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
The duration in moderate intensity levels will be measured by an accelerometer (Actigraph, wGT3X, Pensacola, USA) worn at the belt on the right hip as recommended (Garnotel et al., 2018). The accelerometer is worn continously for 48 hours (i.e., from 00 to 24 hours). The Actilife ® software (current version 6) will be used to analyzed the data recorded by the accelerometer accordingly based on the activity counts determined by Freedson et al., (1998).
48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Daily duration in hard/very hard intensity levels.
Time Frame: 48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
This duration in hard/very hard intensity levels will be measured by an accelerometer (Actigraph, wGT3X, Pensacola, USA) worn at the belt on the right hip as recommended (Garnotel et al., 2018). The accelerometer is worn continously for 48 hours (i.e., from 00 to 24 hours). The Actilife ® software (current version 6) will be used to analyzed the data recorded by the accelerometer accordingly based on the activity counts determined by Freedson et al., (1998).
48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Number of steps per day.
Time Frame: 48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Number of steps per day will be measured by an accelerometer (Actigraph, wGT3X, Pensacola, USA) worn at the belt on the right hip as recommended (Garnotel et al., 2018). The accelerometer is worn continously for 48 hours (i.e., from 00 to 24 hours). The Actilife ® software (current version 6) will be used to analyzed the data recorded by the accelerometer.
48 hours (from 00 to 24 hours) at week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Time to complete the 10 meters walking test.
Time Frame: Test performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Timing the duration to complete the 10 meters distance, as fast as possible but with no running.
Test performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Distance in meters achieved during the 6 minutes walking test.
Time Frame: Test performed only at 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Test performed only at 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Manual muscle test of the medical research council.
Time Frame: Test performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Manual muscle test that assesses 3 muscle groups of the upper and lower limb (shoulder abductor, elbow flexor, wrist extensor, hip flexor, knee extensor and ankle dorsiflexor) with scores from 0 to 5. This test has been validated for patient with acquired paresis in intensive care unit (De Jonghe, 2002) and for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (Ciesla et al., 2011). The score range from 0 to 60 (i.e., complete paresis to normal strength).
Test performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1).
Time Frame: Measure performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
This will be measured using a portable spirometer.
Measure performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Forced expiratory volume (FEV).
Time Frame: Measure performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
This will be measured using a portable spirometer.
Measure performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Skeletal muscle mass.
Time Frame: Measure performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
This will be measured using portable bioimpedancemetry with the Biody Xpert device. Data recorded will be analyzed using the Biodymanager software
Measure performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Undernutrition blood marker.
Time Frame: Blood test performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Dosage of prealbumine and albumin will be specifically searched
Blood test performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
Muscle tonus (stiffness coefficient).
Time Frame: Measure performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).
This will be measured using portable tonus device measurement Myotonpro® on quadriceps, hamstring and triceps muscles, at both lower limbs. A probe will stimulate and record the stiffness coefficient of the targeted muscles.
Measure performed at the beginning of week 1 (start), week 2, week 3, week 4 (end) of rehabilitation and 3 months after rehabilitation discharge (i.e., week 16, follow-up).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sébastien MATEO, PT, PhD, Service Kinésithérapie

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 2, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Physical therapy that include a standardized cycling training with functional electrical stimulation

Subscribe